Structural basis for site-specific ribose methylation by box C/D RNA protein complexes

Nature

Volumn 469, Issue 7331, 2011, Pages 559-564

  Lin, Jinzhong ^a   Lai, Shaomei ^a   Jia, Ru ^a   Xu, Anbi ^a   Zhang, Liman ^a,b   Lu, Jing ^a,b   Ye, Keqiong ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBRILLARIN; L7AE PROTEIN; NOP5 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; RIBOSE; RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; METHYLATION; PROTEIN; RNA; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; METHYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION;

CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; METHYLATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RIBOSE; RNA, ARCHAEAL; SULFOLOBUS SOLFATARICUS;

ARCHAEA;

EID: 79251574683     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature09688     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Venema, J. & Tollervey, D. Ribosome synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 261-311 (1999)
2. Kiss, T. Small nucleolar RNA-guided post-transcriptional modification of cellular RNAs. EMBO J. 20, 3617-3622 (2001)
3. Reichow, S. L., Hamma, T., Ferre-D'Amare, A. R. & Varani, G. The structure and function of small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 1452-1464 (2007)
4. Henras, A. K. et al. The post-transcriptional steps of eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2334-2359 (2008)
5. Cavaille, J., Nicoloso, M. & Bachellerie, J. P. Targeted ribose methylation of RNA in vivo directed by tailored antisense RNA guides. Nature 383, 732-735 (1996)
6. Kiss-Laszlo, Z., Henry, Y., Bachellerie, J. P., Caizergues-Ferrer, M. & Kiss, T. Sitespecific ribose methylation of preribosomal RNA: a novel function for small nucleolar RNAs. Cell 85, 1077-1088 (1996)
7. Tycowski, K. T., Smith, C. M., Shu, M. D. & Steitz, J. A. A small nucleolar RNA requirement for site-specific ribose methylation of rRNA in Xenopus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14480-14485 (1996)
8. Omer, A. D. et al. Homologs of small nucleolar RNAs in Archaea. Science 288, 517-522 (2000)
9. Wang, H., Boisvert, D., Kim, K. K., Kim, R.& Kim, S. H. Crystal structure of a fibrillarin homologue from Methanococcus jannaschii, A hyperthermophile, At L.6 A resolution. EMBO J. 19, 317-323 (2000)
10. Vidovic, I., Nottrott, S., Hartmuth, K., Luhrmann, R. & Ficner, R. Crystal structure of the spliceosomal 15.5kD protein bound to a U4 snRNA fragment. Mol. Cell 6, 1331-1342 (2000)
11. Watkins,N. J.et al.AcommoncoreRNPstructuresharedbetweenthesmallnucleoar box C/D RNPs and the spliceosomal U4 snRNP. Cell 103, 457-466 (2000)
12. Cahill, N. M. et al. Site-specific cross-linking analyses reveal an asymmetric protein distribution for a box C/D snoRNP. EMBO J. 21, 3816-3828 (2002)
13. Omer, A. D., Ziesche, S., Ebhardt, H. & Dennis, P. P. In vitro reconstitutionandactivity of a C/D box methylation guide ribonucleoprotein complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5289-5294 (2002)
14. Aittaleb, M. et al. Structure and function of archaeal box C/D sRNP core proteins. Nature Struct. Biol. 10, 256-263 (2003)
15. Rashid, R. et al. Functional requirement for symmetric assembly of archaeal box C/D small ribonucleoprotein particles. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 295-306 (2003)
16. Tran, E. J., Zhang, X. & Maxwell, E. S. Efficient RNA 29-O-methylation requires juxtaposed and symmetrically assembled archaeal box C/D and C9/D9 RNPs. EMBO J. 22, 3930-3940 (2003)
17. Moore, T., Zhang, Y., Fenley, M. O. & Li, H. Molecular basis of box C/D RNA-protein interactions; Cocrystal structure of archaealL7Aeanda box C/DRNA. Structure12, 807-818 (2004)
18. Tran, E., Zhang, X., Lackey, L. & Maxwell, E. S. Conserved spacing between the box C/D and C9/D9 RNPs of the archaeal box C/D sRNP complex is required for efficient 29-O-methylation of target RNAs. RNA 11, 285-293 (2005)
19. Hardin, J. W. & Batey, R. T. Thebipartite architecture of the sRNAin an archaeal box C/D complex is a primary determinant of specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 5039-5051 (2006)
20. Omer, A. D., Zago, M., Chang, A. & Dennis, P. P. Probing the structure and functionof an archaeal C/D-box methylation guide sRNA. RNA 12, 1708-1720 (2006)
21. Zhang, X. et al. The coiled-coil domain of theNop56/58 core protein is dispensable for sRNP assembly but is critical for archaeal box C/D sRNP-guided nucleotide methylation. RNA 12, 1092-1103 (2006)
22. Oruganti, S. et al. Alternative conformations of the archaeal Nop56/58-fibrillarin complex imply flexibility in box C/D RNPs. J. Mol. Biol. 371, 1141-1150 (2007)
23. Ye, K. et al. Structural organization ofbox C/DRNA- guidedRNAmethyltransferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13808-13813 (2009)
24. Bleichert, F. et al. A dimeric structure for archaeal box C/D small ribonucleoproteins. Science 325, 1384-1387 (2009)
25. Xue, S. et al. Structural basis for substrate placement by an archaeal box C/D ribonucleoprotein particle. Mol. Cell 39, 939-949 (2010)
26. Klein, D. J., Schmeing, T. M., Moore, P. B. & Steitz, T. A. The kink-turn: a new RNA secondary structure motif. EMBO J. 20, 4214-4221 (2001)
27. Watkins, N. J., Dickmanns, A. & Luhrmann, R. Conserved stem II of the box C/D motif is essential for nucleolar localization and is required, Along with the 15.5K protein, For the hierarchical assembly of the box C/D snoRNP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 8342-8352 (2002)
28. Chen, C. L., Perasso, R., Qu, L. H. & Amar, L. Exploration of pairing constraints identifies a 9 base-pair core within box C/D snoRNA-rRNA duplexes. J. Mol. Biol. 369, 771-783 (2007)
29. Appel, C. D. & Maxwell, E. S. Structural features of the guide:target RNA duplex required for archaeal box C/DsRNA-guided nucleotide29-O-methylation. RNA 13, 899-911 (2007)
30. DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL User's Manual (Delano Scientific, 2002)
31. Price, S. R., Ito, N., Oubridge, C., Avis, J. M.& Nagai, K. Crystallization ofRNA-protein complexes. I. Methods for the large-scale preparation of RNA suitable for crystallographic studies. J. Mol. Biol. 249, 398-408 (1995)
32. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997)
33. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658-674 (2007)
34. Vagin, A. A. & Teplyakov, A. MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 1022-1025 (1997)
35. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126-2132 (2004)
36. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213-221 (2010)
37. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., Lebedev, A., Wilson, K. S. & Dodson, E. J. Efficient anisotropic refinement ofmacromolecular structures using FFT. Acta Crystallogr. D 55, 247-255 (1999).