Pre-40S ribosome biogenesis factor Tsr1 is an inactive structural mimic of translational GTPases

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  McCaughan, Urszula M ^a   Jayachandran, Uma ^a   Shchepachev, Vadim ^a   Chen, Zhuo Angel ^a   Rappsilber, Juri ^a,b   Tollervey, David ^a   Cook, Atlanta G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE RIO1; ELONGATION FACTOR TU; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; INITIATION FACTOR 5; INITIATION FACTOR 5B; MESSENGER RNA; RIBOSOME PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SELB PROTEIN; SELENOCYSTEINE; TSR1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-5B; INITIATION FACTOR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; RIO1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ACIDIFICATION; BIOGENIC MATERIAL; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CYTOPLASM; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; MATURATION; MIMICRY; PREDICTION; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CELL BUDDING; CELL MATURATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CYTOPLASM; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; NONHUMAN; ORGANELLE BIOGENESIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RIBOSOME; RIBOSOME SUBUNIT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SURFACE PROPERTY; 40S RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT; 60S RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT; ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BETA SHEET; CHEMISTRY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CLONING, MOLECULAR; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTORS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION, ALPHA-HELICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION, BETA-STRAND; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, LARGE, EUKARYOTIC; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, SMALL, EUKARYOTIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 84973353673     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11789     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Henras, A. K., Plisson-Chastang, C., O'Donohue, M. F., Chakraborty, A. & Gleizes, P. E. An overview of pre-ribosomal RNA processing in eukaryotes. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 6, 225-242 (2015).
2. Karbstein, K. Quality control mechanisms during ribosome maturation. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 242-250 (2013).
3. Kressler, D., Hurt, E. & Bassler, J. Driving ribosome assembly. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1803, 673-683 (2010).
4. Woolford, Jr J. L. & Baserga, S. J. Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195, 643-681 (2013).
5. Udem, S. A. & Warner, J. R. The cytoplasmic maturation of a ribosomal precursor ribonucleic acid in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 248, 1412-1416 (1973).
6. Schafer, T. et al. Hrr25-dependent phosphorylation state regulates organization of the pre-40S subunit. Nature 441, 651-655 (2006).
7. Schafer, T., Strauss, D., Petfalski, E., Tollervey, D. & Hurt, E. The path from nucleolar 90S to cytoplasmic 40S pre-ribosomes. EMBO J. 22, 1370-1380 (2003).
8. Zemp, I. & Kutay, U. Nuclear export and cytoplasmic maturation of ribosomal subunits. FEBS Lett. 581, 2783-2793 (2007).
9. Hector, R. D. et al. Snapshots of pre-rRNA structural flexibility reveal eukaryotic 40S assembly dynamics at nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 12138-12154 (2014).
10. Turowski, T. W. et al. Rio1 mediates ATP-dependent final maturation of 40S ribosomal subunits. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 12189-12199 (2014).
11. Zemp, I. et al. Distinct cytoplasmic maturation steps of 40S ribosomal subunit precursors require hRio2. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1167-1180 (2009).
12. Lebaron, S. et al. Proofreading of pre-40S ribosome maturation by a translation initiation factor and 60S subunits. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 744-753 (2012).
13. Strunk, B. S., Novak, M. N., Young, C. L. & Karbstein, K. A translation-like cycle is a quality control checkpoint for maturing 40S ribosome subunits. Cell 150, 111-121 (2012).
14. Gelperin, D., Horton, L., Beckman, J., Hensold, J. & Lemmon, S. K. Bms1p, a novel GTP-binding protein, and the related Tsr1p are required for distinct steps of 40S ribosome biogenesis in yeast. RNA 7, 1268-1283 (2001).
15. Strunk, B. S. et al. Ribosome assembly factors prevent premature translation initiation by 40S assembly intermediates. Science 333, 1449-1453 (2011).
16. Holm, L. & Rosenstrom, P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545-W549 (2010).
17. Wittinghofer, A. & Vetter, I. R. Structure-function relationships of the G domain, a canonical switch motif. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 943-971 (2011).
18. Berchtold, H. et al. Crystal structure of active elongation factor Tu reveals major domain rearrangements. Nature 365, 126-132 (1993).
19. Leibundgut, M., Frick, C., Thanbichler, M., Bock, A. & Ban, N. Selenocysteine tRNA-specific elongation factor SelB is a structural chimaera of elongation and initiation factors. EMBO J. 24, 11-22 (2005).
20. Itoh, Y., Sekine, S. & Yokoyama, S. Crystal structure of the full-length bacterial selenocysteine-specific elongation factor SelB. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 9028-9038 (2015).
21. Rother, M., Wilting, R., Commans, S. & Bock, A. Identification and characterisation of the selenocysteine-specific translation factor SelB from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii. J. Mol. Biol. 299, 351-358 (2000).
22. Kuhle, B. & Ficner, R. eIF5B employs a novel domain release mechanism to catalyze ribosomal subunit joining. EMBO J. 33, 1177-1191 (2014).
23. Zheng, A. et al. X-ray structures of eIF5B and the eIF5B-eIF1A complex: the conformational flexibility of eIF5B is restricted on the ribosome by interaction with eIF1A. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 70, 3090-3098 (2014).
24. Fernandez, I. S. et al. Molecular architecture of a eukaryotic translational initiation complex. Science 342, 1240585 (2013).
25. Yamamoto, H. et al. Structure of the mammalian 80S initiation complex with initiation factor 5B on HCV-IRES RNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 721-727 (2014).
26. Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J. & McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037-10041 (2001).
27. Landau, M. et al. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W299-W302 (2005).
28. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
29. Granneman, S., Petfalski, E., Swiatkowska, A. & Tollervey, D. Cracking pre-40S ribosomal subunit structure by systematic analyses of RNA-protein cross-linking. EMBO J. 29, 2026-2036 (2010).
30. Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 133-144 (2010).
31. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 72-82 (2006).
32. Foadi, J. et al. Clustering procedures for the optimal selection of data sets from multiple crystals in macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1617-1632 (2013).
33. Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112-122 (2008).
34. Pape, T. & Schneider, T. R. HKL2MAP: a graphical user interface for macromolecular phasing with SHELX programs. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 37, 843-844 (2004).
35. Vonrhein, C., Blanc, E., Roversi, P. & Bricogne, G. Automated structure solution with autoSHARP. Methods Mol. Biol. 364, 215-230 (2007).
36. Terwilliger, T. C. Rapid automatic NCS identification using heavy-atom substructures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 2213-2215 (2002).
37. Terwilliger, T. C. et al. Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 64, 61-69 (2008).
38. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
39. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W. & Kjeldgaard, M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron-density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 110-119 (1991).
40. Bricogne, G. et al. BUSTER version 2.10.2 (Global Phasing Ltd., Cambridge, UK, 2016).
41. Read, R. J. & McCoy, A. J. Using SAD data in Phaser. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 338-344 (2011).
42. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12-21 (2010).
43. Janke, C. et al. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21, 947-962 (2004).