High substrate uptake rates empower Vibrio natriegens as production host for industrial biotechnology

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 83, Issue 22, 2017, Pages

  Hoffart, Eugenia ^a   Grenz, Sebastian ^a   Lange, Julian ^a   Nitschel, Robert ^a   Müller, Felix ^a   Schwentner, Andreas ^a   Feith, André ^a   Lenfers Lücker, Mira ^a   Takors, Ralf ^a   Blombach, Bastian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alanine production; Glucose consumption rate; Growth rate; Industrial biotechnology; Productivity; Vibrio natriegens

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CULTIVATION; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; GROWTH RATE; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCTIVITY;

BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCESS; GLUCOSE CONSUMPTION RATE; INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL FERMENTATION; MICROBIAL PRODUCTION; NON-PATHOGENIC BACTERIUM; VIBRIO NATRIEGENS; VOLUMETRIC PRODUCTIVITY;

SUBSTRATES;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BACTERIUM; BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; GROWTH RATE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); VIBRIO NATRIEGENS;

EID: 85032684969     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01614-17     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Stephanopoulos G. 2007. Challenges in engineering microbes for biofuels production. Science 315:801-804. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139612
2. Parekh S, Vinci VA, Strobel RJ. 2000. Improvement of microbial strains and fermentation processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:287-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000403
3. Lee SY, Kim HU. 2015. Systems strategies for developing industrial microbial strains. Nat Biotechnol 33:1061-1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nbt.3365
4. Rogers JK, Taylor ND, Church GM. 2016. Biosensor-based engineering of biosynthetic pathways. Curr Opin Biotechnol 42:84-91. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.005
5. Nielsen J, Keasling JD. 2016. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell 164: 1185-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.004
6. Jakočiuńas T, Jensen MK, Keasling JD. 2016. CRISPR/Cas9 advances engineering of microbial cell factories. Metab Eng 34:44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.003
7. King ZA, Lloyd CJ, Feist AM, Palsson BO. 2015. Next-generation genomescale models for metabolic engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 35:23-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.016
8. Smanski MJ, Zhou H, Claesen J, Shen B, Fischbach MA, Voigt CA. 2016. Synthetic biology to access and expand nature's chemical diversity. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:135-149. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2015.24
9. Becker J, Wittmann C. 2015. Advanced biotechnology: metabolically engineered cells for the bio-based production of chemicals and fuels, materials, and health-care products. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54: 3328-3350. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409033
10. Becker J, Zelder O, Häfner S, Schröder H, Wittmann C. 2011. From zero to hero-design-based systems metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for L-lysine production. Metab Eng 13:159-168. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.01.003
11. Smith GM, Lee SA, Reilly KC, Eiteman MA, Altman E. 2006. Fed-batch two-phase production of alanine by a metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett 28:1695-1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9142-3
12. Sauer U, Hatzimanikatis V, Hohmann HP, Manneberg M, van Loon AP, Bailey JE. 1996. Physiology and metabolic fluxes of wild-type and riboflavinproducing Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3687-3696
13. Varma A, Palsson BO. 1994. Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3724-3731
14. Michel A, Koch-Koerfges A, Krumbach K, Brocker M, Bott M. 2015. Anaerobic growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum via mixed-acid fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:7496-7508. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02413-15
15. Nishimura T, Vertès AA, Shinoda Y, Inui M, Yukawa H. 2007. Anaerobic growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum using nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:889-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-0879-y
16. 2 on anaerobic succinate production by Corynebacterium glutamicum: carbon flux analysis by 13C-NMR. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3015-3024. https://doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.04189-13
17. Gombert AK, dos Santos MM, Christensen B, Nielsen J. 2001. Network identification and flux quantification in the central metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different conditions of glucose repression. J Bacteriol 183:1441-1451. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.4.1441-1451.2001
18. Nissen TL, Schulze U, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 1997. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 143:203-218. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-1-203
19. Payne WJ, Eagon RG, Williams AK. 1961. Some observations on the physiology of Pseudomonas natriegens nov. spec. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 27:121-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538432
20. Eagon RG. 1962. Pseudomonas natriegens, a marine bacterium with a generation time of less than 10 minutes. J Bacteriol 83:736-737
21. Weinstock MT, Hesek ED, Wilson CM, Gibson DG. 2016. Vibrio natriegens as a fast-growing host for molecular biology. Nat Methods 13:849-851. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3970
22. Dalia TN, Hayes CA, Stolyar S, Marx CJ, McKinlay JB, Dalia AB. 2017. Multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT) for synthetic biology in Vibrio natriegens. ACS Synth Biol https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00116
23. Eikmanns BJ, Metzger M, Reinscheid D, Kircher M, Sahm H. 1991. Amplification of three threonine biosynthesis genes in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its influence on carbon flux in different strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34:617-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167910
24. Maida I, Bosi E, Perrin E, Papaleo MC, Orlandini V, Fondi M, Fani R, Wiegel J, Bianconi G, Canganella F. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the fastgrowing bacterium Vibrio natriegens strain DSMZ 759. Genome Announc 1:e00648-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00648-13
25. Wang Z, Lin B, Hervey WJ, IV, Vora GJ. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the fast-growing marine bacterium Vibrio natriegens strain ATCC 14048. Genome Announc 1:e00589-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00589-13
26. Milton DL, O'Toole R, Hörstedt P, Wolf-Watz H. 1996. Flagellin A is essential for the virulence of Vibrio anguillarum. J Bacteriol 178: 1310-1319. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.5.1310-1319.1996
27. Chisti Y. 1992. Build better industrial bioreactors. Chem Eng Progress 88:55-58
28. Andersen KB, von Meyenburg K. 1980. Are growth rates of Escherichia coli in batch cultures limited by respiration? J Bacteriol 144:114-123
29. Tännler S, Decasper S, Sauer U. 2008. Maintenance metabolism and carbon fluxes in Bacillus species. Microb Cell Fact 7:19. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1475-2859-7-19
30. 3-levels on metabolism and regulation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol 168:331-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.005
31. Beck C, von Meyenburg HK. 1968. Enzyme pattern and aerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under various degrees of glucose limitation. J Bacteriol 96:479-486
32. Wendisch VF, Brito LF, Gil Lopez M, Hennig G, Pfeifenschneider J, Sgobba E, Veldmann KH. 2016. The flexible feedstock concept in industrial biotechnology: metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and yeast strains for access to alternative carbon sources. J Biotechnol 234:139-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.022
33. Eagon RG, Wang CH. 1962. Dissimilation of glucose and gluconic acid by Pseudomonas natriegens. J Bacteriol 83:879-886
34. Rühl J, Schmid A, Blank LM. 2009. Selected Pseudomonas putida strains able to grow in the presence of high butanol concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4653-4656. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00225-09
35. van Duuren JB, Puchalka J, Mars AE, Bücker R, Eggink G, Wittmann C, Dos Santos VA. 2013. Reconciling in vivo and in silico key biological parameters of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 during growth on glucose under carbon-limited condition. BMC Biotechnol 13:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-93
36. Jang YS, Kim B, Shin JH, Choi YJ, Choi S, Song CW, Lee J, Park HG, Lee SY. 2012. Bio-based production of C2-C6 platform chemicals. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:2437-2459. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24599
37. Lange J, Takors R, Blombach B. 2016. Zero-growth bioprocesses-a challenge for microbial production strains and bioprocess engineering. Eng Life Sci 17:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201600108
38. Sauer M, Porro D, Mattanovich D, Branduardi P. 2008. Microbial production of organic acids: expanding the markets. Trends Biotechnol 26: 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.006
39. Wieschalka S, Blombach B, Bott M, Eikmanns BJ. 2013. Bio-based production of organic acids with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol 6:87-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12013
40. Cho C, Choi SY, Luo ZW, Lee SY. 2015. Recent advances in microbial production of fuels and chemicals using tools and strategies of systems metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Adv 33:1455-1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.11.006
41. Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenisis in Gram negative bacteria. Nat Biotechnol 1:787-796. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nbt1183-784
42. Sambrook J, Russell DW, Irwin N, Janssen UA. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
43. Lamprecht W, Heinz F. 1983. D-Glucose, p 163-172. In Bergmeyer HU (ed), Methods of enzymatic analysis, 3rd ed, vol 6. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany
44. Teleki A, Sánchez-Kopper A, Takors R. 2015. Alkaline conditions in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography for intracellular metabolite quantification using tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 475: 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.01.002
45. Buchholz J, Graf M, Blombach B, Takors R. 2014. Improving the carbon balance of fermentations by total carbon analyses. Biochem Eng J 90:162-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2014.06.007