Individual latent error detection: Simply stop, look and listen

Safety Science

Volumn 101, Issue , 2018, Pages 305-312

  Saward, Justin R E ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

LATENT ERRORS; LEVEL OF SAFETIES; NORMAL OPERATIONS; ORGANISATIONAL; PERFORMANCE VARIABILITY; SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; SAFETY STRATEGY; SYSTEM FAILURES;

ERROR DETECTION;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AVIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUAL LATENT ERROR DETECTION; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 85030330228     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amalberti, R., Navigating Safety: Necessary Compromises and Trade-offs – Theory and Practice. 2013, Springer, Netherlands.
2. Amalberti, R., Wioland, L., 1997. “Human error in aviation.” Paper presented at the International Aviation Safety Conference. Rotterdam Airport, The Netherlands, 27–29 August 1997. In: Soekkha, H. (Ed.), Aviation Safety. VSP, Utrech, pp. 91–108.
3. Bartlett, F.C., Remembering: A Study of Experimental and Social Psychology. 1932, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Blavier, A., Rouy, E., Nyssen, A.S., De Keyser, V., Prospective issues for error detection. Ergonomics 48:7 (2005), 758–781.
5. Chatzimichailidou, M.M., Stanton, N.A., Dokas, I.M., The concept of risk situation awareness provision: towards a new approach for assessing the DSA about the threats and vulnerabilities of complex socio-technical systems. Saf. Sci. 79 (2015), 126–138.
6. Cohen, G., Eysenck, M.W., LeVoi, M.E., Memory. 1986, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
7. Cornelissen, M., Salmon, P.M., Jenkins, D.P., Lenné, M.G., A structured approach to the strategies analysis phase of cognitive work analysis. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 14:6 (2013), 546–564.
8. Dekker, S., The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error. 3rd ed, 2014, Ashgate, Aldershot.
9. Fawcett, T., An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27 (2006), 861–874.
10. Fitts, P.M., Posner, M.I., Human Performance. 1967, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
11. Hobbs, A., Williamson, A., Unsafe acts and unsafe outcomes in aircraft maintenance. Ergonomics 45:12 (2002), 866–882.
12. Hollnagel, E., Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management. 2014, Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
13. Kontogiannis, T., A systems perspective of managing error recovery and tactical re-planning of operating teams in safety critical domains. J. Safety Res. 42:2 (2011), 73–85.
14. Kleiner, B.M., Hettinger, L.J., DeJoy, D.M., Huang, Y.-H., Love, P.E.D., Sociotechnical attributes of safe and unsafe work systems. Ergonomics 58:4 (2015), 635–649.
15. Kvavilashvili, L., Mandler, G., Out of one's mind: a study of involuntary semantic memories. Cogn. Psychol. 48 (2004), 47–94.
16. Latorella, K.A., Prabhu, P.V., A review of human error in aviation maintenance and inspection. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 26:2 (2000), 133–161.
17. Leveson, N., A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42 (2004), 237–270.
18. Liang, G., Lin, J., Hwang, S., Wang, E., Patterson, P., Preventing human errors in aviation maintenance using an on-line maintenance assistance platform. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40 (2010), 356–367.
19. Mandler, G., Cognitive Psychology: An Essay in Cognitive Science. 1985, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Matthews, B.W., Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) – Protein Struct. 405:2 (1975), 442–451.
21. Mazzoni, G., Vannucci, M., Batool, I., Manipulating cues in involuntary autobiographical memory: verbal cues are more effective than pictorial cues. Memory Cognition 42 (2014), 1076–1085.
22. Morel, G., Amalberti, R., Chauvin, C., Articulating the differences between safety and resilience: the decision-making process of professional sea-fishing skippers. Hum. Factors 50:1 (2008), 1–16.
23. Naderpour, M., Lu, J., Zhang, G., A situation risk awareness approach for process systems safety. Saf. Sci. 64 (2014), 173–189.
24. Niesser, U., Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. 1976, Freeman, San Francisco.
25. Niskanen, T., Louhelainen, K., Hirvonen, M.L., A systems thinking approach of occupational safety and health applied in the micro-, meso- and macro-levels: a Finnish survey. Saf. Sci. 82 (2016), 212–227.
26. Norman, D., Categorization of action slips. Psychol. Rev. 88 (1981), 1–15.
27. Plant, K.L., Stanton, N.A., What is on your mind? Using the perceptual cycle model and critical decision method to understand the decision-making process in the cockpit. Ergonomics 56:8 (2013), 1232–1250.
28. Rashid, H.S.J., Place, C.S., Braithwaite, G.R., Helicopter maintenance error analysis: beyond the third order of the HFACS-ME. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40:6 (2010), 636–647.
29. Rasmussen, A.S., Berntsen, D., The unpredictable past: spontaneous autobiographical memories outnumber autobiographical memories retrieved strategically. Conscious. Cogn. 20 (2011), 1842–1846.
30. Reason, J., Human Error. 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Reason, J., The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries. 2008, Ashgate, Aldershot.
32. Reason, J., Hobbs, A., Managing Maintenance Error: A Practical Guide. 2003, Ashgate, Aldershot.
33. Saward, J.R.E., Stanton, N.A., Individual latent error detection and recovery in naval aircraft maintenance: introducing a proposal linking schema theory with a multi-process approach to human error research. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 16:3 (2015), 255–272.
34. Saward, J.R.E., Stanton, N.A., Latent error detection: a golden two hours for detection. Appl. Ergon. 59 (2017), 104–113.
35. Stanton, N.A., Baber, C., A systems approach to human error identification. Saf. Sci. 22:1–3 (1996), 215–228.
36. Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., Beyond human error taxonomies in assessment of risk in sociotechnical systems: a new paradigm with the EAST ‘broken-links’ approach. Ergonomics, 2017, 10.1080/00140139.2016.1232841.
37. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf. Sci. 47 (2009), 227–237.
38. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D., Genotype and phenotype schemata and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 10:1 (2009), 43–68.
39. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Harris, D., Marshall, A., Demagalski, J., Young, M.S., Waldmann, T., Dekker, S., Predicting pilot error: testing a new methodology and a multi-methods and analysts approach. Appl. Ergon. 40 (2009), 464–471.
40. Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S., What price ergonomics?. Nature 399 (1999), 197–198.
41. Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Jenkins, D.P., A review of sociotechnical systems theory: a classic concept for new command and control paradigms. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 9:6 (2008), 479–499.
42. Wiegmann, D.A., Shappell, S.A., Human error perspectives in aviation. Int. J. Aviation Psychol. 11:4 (2001), 341–357.
43. Wiegmann, D.A., Shappell, S.A., A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. 2003, Ashgate, Aldershot.
44. Wilkinson, W.E., Cauble, L.A., Patel, V.L., Error detection and recovery in dialysis nursing. J. Patient Safety 7:4 (2011), 213–223.
45. Woods, D.D., Dekker, S., Cook, R., Johannesen, L., Sarter, N., Behind Human Error. 2nd ed., 2010, Ashgate, Farnham; Burlington, VT.