The concept of risk situation awareness provision: Towards a new approach for assessing the DSA about the threats and vulnerabilities of complex socio-technical systems

Safety Science

Volumn 79, Issue , 2015, Pages 126-138

  Chatzimichailidou, Maria Mikela ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^b   Dokas, Ioannis M ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Distributed situation awareness; Hazard analysis techniques; Risk situation awareness provision; Situation awareness; Socio technical systems

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS; HAZARDS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

ASSESSMENT APPROACHES; EMERGENT PROPERTY; HAZARD ANALYSIS; INFORMATION FLOWS; MID-AIR COLLISIONS; SITUATION AWARENESS; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES;

SEARCH ENGINES;

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SENSOR; SOCIO TECHNICAL SYSTEM; TECHNOLOGY; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

EID: 84935002899     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boy G.A. Orchestrating situation awareness and authority in complex socio-technical systems. Complex Systems Design & Management 2013, 285-296. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
2. Dokas I.M., Feehan J., Imran S. EWaSAP: an early warning sign identification approach based on a systemic hazard analysis. Saf. Sci. 2013, 58:11-26.
3. Endsley, M.R., 1988. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 32(2). SAGE Publications, pp. 97-101.
4. Endsley M.R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 1995, 37(1):32-64.
5. Fioratou E., Flin R., Glavin R., Patey R. Beyond monitoring: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia. Br. J. Anaesth. 2010, 105(1):83-90.
6. German Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation - Bundesstelle für Flugunfalluntersuchung (BFU), 2004. BFU Überlingen Accident Report. http://www.bfu-web.de/EN/Publications/Investigation%20Report/2002/Report_02_AX001-1-2_Ueberlingen_Report.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
7. Hilder, T., 1995. The viable system model. http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~rxv/orgmgt/vsm.pdf.
8. Jeannot E., Kelly C., Thompson D. The Development of Situation Awareness Measures in ATM Systems 2003, Eurocontrol, Brussels.
9. Johnson, C.W., 2004. Final Report: review of the BFU Überlingen Accident Report. Contract C/1.369/HQ/SS/04 to Eurocontrol. http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~johnson/Eurocontrol/Ueberlingen/Ueberlingen_Final_Report.PDF.
10. Leveson N. Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety 2011, Mit Press.
11. Naderpour M., Lu J., Zhang G. A situation risk awareness approach for process systems safety. Saf. Sci. 2014, 64:173-189.
12. Nunes, A., Laursen, T., 2004. Identifying the factors that contributed to the Überlingen Midair Collision. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 48(1). SAGE Publications, pp. 195-198.
13. Rasmussen, J., Svedung, I., 2000. Proactive risk management in dynamic society.
14. Salas E., Prince C., Baker D.P., Shrestha L. Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 1995, 37(1):123-136.
15. Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Baber C., Jenkins D.P., McMaster R., Young M.S. What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2008, 9(4):297-323.
16. Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Jenkins D., Ladva D., Rafferty L., Young M. Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: comparison of measures study. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009, 39(3):490-500.
17. Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Jenkins D.P. Distributed Situation Awareness: Theory, Measurement and Application to Teamwork 2009, Ashgate, Aldershot.
18. Sarter N.B., Woods D.D. Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 1991, 1(1):45-57.
19. Smart, P.R., Bahrami, A., Braines, D., McRae-Spencer, D., Yuan, J., Shadbolt, N.R., 2007. Semantic technologies and enhanced situation awareness. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/264351/.
20. Sorathia, V.S., 2008. Dynamic Information Management Methodology with Situation Awareness Capability (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and communication Technology (DA-IICT), Gandhinagar, India).
21. Stanton N.A., Chambers P.R.G., Piggott J. Situational awareness and safety. Saf. Sci. 2001, 39(3):189-204.
22. Stanton N.A., Young M.S. Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. Appl. Ergon. 2003, 34(5):479-490.
23. Stanton N.A., Salmon P.M., Walker G.H., Baber C., Jenkins D.P. Human Factors Methods: a Practical Guide for Engineering and Design 2005, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
24. Stanton N.A., Stewart R., Harris D., Houghton R.J., Baber C., McMaster R., Salmon P.M., Hoyle G., Walker G.H., Young M.S., Linsell M., Dymott R., Green D. Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics 2006, 49(12-13):1288-1311.
25. Stanton N.A., Salmon P.M., Walker G.H., Jenkins D.P. Is situation awareness all in the mind?. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2010, 11(1-2):29-40.
26. Walker G.H., Stanton N.A., Salmon P.M., Jenkins D.P. A review of sociotechnical systems theory: a classic concept for new command and control paradigms. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2008, 9(6):479-499.
27. Wong, B., 2004. A STAMP model of the Überlingen aircraft collision accident (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).