Limits to human enhancement: Nature, disease, therapy or betterment?

BMC Medical Ethics

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Hofmann, Bjørn ^a,b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Disease; Enhancement; Limits; Naturalness; Nature; Therapy

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CHARACTERISTIC; MEDICAL ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMAN CHARACTERISTICS; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 85030324464     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0215-8     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Giubilini A, Sanyal S. Challenging human enhancement. In: The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate; 2016. p. 1.
2. Coady T, Sanyal S, Giubilini A. The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
3. Kamm FM. Is there a problem with enhancement? Am J Bioeth. 2005;5(3):5-14.
4. President's Council on Bioethics, Kass L. Beyond therapy: biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. New York: Harper Perennial; 2003.
5. Buchanan A. Human nature and enhancement. Bioethics. 2009;23(3):141-50. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00633.x.
6. Sandel MJ. The case against perfection: what's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass: 1993). 2004;292(3):50-4. 6-60, 2
7. Proust J. Chapitre 9. Cognitive enhancement, human evolution and bioethics. J Int Bioéthique. 2012;22(3):153-73.
8. Barilan YM, Weintraub M. The naturalness of the artificial and our concepts of health, disease and medicine. Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(3):311-25.
9. Lovejoy A. The great chain of being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1936.
10. Collingwood RG. The idea of nature. London: Clarendon Press; 1945.
11. Armstrong D. Chronic illness: a revisionist account. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(1):15-27.
12. Goody J. The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977.
13. Austriaco N. Human nature as normative concept: relevance for health care. In: Handbook of the philosophy of medicine. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media; 2015. p. 1-10.
14. Murray T. Enhancement. In: Steinbock B, editor. Oxford: The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press; 2009.
15. Fukuyama F. Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2003.
16. Parens E. The goodness of fragility: on the prospect of genetic technologies aimed at the enhancement of human capacities. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995;5(2):141-53.
17. Kass LR. Human cloning and human dignity: the report of the President's Council on Bioethics. New York: PublicAffairs; 2002.
18. Kass LR. Defending human dignity. In: Schulman A, editor. Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. Washington DC: President's Council on Bioethics; 2008.
19. Agar N. Truly human enhancement: a philosophical defense of limits. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013.
20. Cohen E. Conservative bioethics & the search for wisdom. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006;36(1):44-56.
21. Lewens T. Human nature: the very idea. Philos Technol. 2012;25(4):459-74.
22. Bostrom N, Ord T. The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics. Ethics. 2006;116(4):656-79.
23. Kahane G, Savulescu J. Normal human variation: refocussing the enhancement debate. Bioethics. 2015;29(2):133-43. 10.1111/bioe.12045.
24. Blackford R. Humanity enhanced: genetic choice and the challenge for liberal democracies. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013.
25. Savulescu J. New breeds of humans: the moral obligation to enhance. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:36-9.
26. Bostrom N, Sandberg A. The wisdom of nature: an evolutionary heuristic for human enhancement. In: Savulescu J, Bostrom N, editors. Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
27. Pugh J, Kahane G, Savulescu J. Bio-conservatism, partiality, and the human nature objection to enhancement. Monist. 2016 In press.
28. Sloterdijk P. Du mußt dein Leben ändern: Über religion. Artistik und Anthropotechnik, Frankfurt am main: Suhrkamp [you must change your life: concerning religion, Artistics and Anthropotechnics]. 2009.
29. Zwart H. From utopia to science: challenges of personalised genomics information for health management and health enhancement. Med Stud. 2009;1(2):155-66.
30. Dow T-I. Human nature and the problem of remolding man. Dialectics Humanism. 1983;10(4):103-16.
31. Juengst E. What's taxonomy got to do with it? 'Species integrity', human rights, and science policy. In: Savulescu J, Bostrom N, editors. Human enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand; 2009. p. 43-58.
32. Garry A. Medicine and medicalization: a response to Purdy. Bioethics. 2001;15(3):262-9.
33. McKibben B. Enough: staying human in an engineered age. New York: Times Books; 2004.
34. Bess M. Enhanced humans versus "normal people": elusive definitions. J Med Philos. 2010;35(6):641-55.
35. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Ideas about naturalness in public and political debates about science, technology and medicine. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2015.
36. Van den Born RJ. Rethinking nature: public visions in the Netherlands. Environ Values. 2008:17(1):83-109.
37. Savulescu J. Justice, fairness, and enhancement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1093:321-38. 10.1196/annals.1382.021.
38. Coenen C, Schuijff M, Smits M. The politics of human enhancement and the European Union. In: Savulescu J, ter Meulen R, Kahane G, editors. Enhancing human capacities. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2011. p. 521-35.
39. Greely HT. Regulating human biological enhancements: questionable justifications and international complications. UTS L Rev. 2005;7:87.
40. Sparrow R. Better than men?: sex and the therapy/enhancement distinction. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2010;20(2):115-44.
41. Duecker F, de Graaf TA, Sack AT. Thinking caps for everyone? The role of neuro-enhancement by non-invasive brain stimulation in neuroscience and beyond. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:71. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00071.
42. Schermer M. Health, happiness and human enhancement-dealing with unexpected effects of deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics. 2013;6:435-45. 10.1007/s12152-011-9097-5.
43. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. A philosophical basis of medical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1981.
44. Benditt TM. Normality, disease and enhancement. In: Kincaid H, McKitrick J, editors. Establishing medical reality: essays in the metaphysics and epistemology of biomedical science. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2007. p. 13-21.
45. Malmqvist E. Reproductive choice, enhancement, and the moral continuum argument. J Med Philos. 2014;39(1):41-54. 10.1093/jmp/jht058.
46. Gyngell C, Douglas T. Selecting against disability: the liberal eugenic challenge and the argument from cognitive diversity. J Appl Philos. 2016;34(4):498-513.
47. Bostrom N, Roache R. Ethical issues in human enhancement. In: New waves in applied ethics; 2008. p. 120-52.
48. Giubilini A. Normality, therapy, and enhancement. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015;24(3):347-54. 10.1017/s0963180114000656.
49. Dekkers W, Rikkert MO. Memory enhancing drugs and Alzheimer's disease: enhancing the self or preventing the loss of it? Med Health Care Philos. 2007;10(2):141.
50. Macklin R. Against relativism: cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine. USA: Oxford University Press; 1999.
51. Morrison M. Growth hormone, enhancement and the pharmaceuticalisation of short stature. Soc Sci Med. 2015;131:305-12.
52. Cummings DE, Cohen RV. Bariatric/metabolic surgery to treat type 2 diabetes in patients with a BMI <35 kg/m2. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):924-33. 10.2337/dc16-0350.
53. Savulescu J, Sandberg A, Kahane G. Well-Being and Enhancement. In: Kahane G, Savulescu J, Ter Meulen R, editors. Enhancing Human Capacities. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001. pp. 3-18.
54. Savulescu J, Bostrom N. Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
55. Lee J. Cochlear implantation, enhancements, transhumanism and posthumanism: some human questions. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015;22(1):67-92. 10.1007/s11948-015-9640-6.
56. Fröding B, Juth N. Cognitive enhancement and the principle of need. Neuroethics. 2015;8(3):231-42.
57. Reznek L. The nature of disease. New York: Routledge & Keagen Paul; 1987.
58. Blank RH. Cognitive enhancement: social and public policy issues. New York: Springer; 2015.
59. Sadegh-Zadeh K. Fuzzy health, illness, and disease. J Med Philos. 2000;25(5):605-38. 10.1076/0360-5310(200010)25:5;1-w;ft605.
60. Worrall J, Worrall J. Defining disease: much ado about nothing? In: Tymieniecka A-T, Agazzi E, editors. Life interpretation and the sense of illness within the human condition. Analecta Husserliana: Springer Netherlands; 2001. p. 33-55.
61. Hesslow G. Do we need a concept of disease? Theor Med. 1993;14(1):1-14.
62. Morrison M. Overdiagnosis, medicalisation and social justice: commentary on Carter et al (2016) 'A definition and ethical evaluation of overdiagnosis'. J Med Ethics. 2016. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103717.
63. Savulescu J. Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics. 2001;15(5-6):413-26.
64. Cooper R. Disease. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C. 2002;33(2):263-82.
65. Nietzsche F. The gay science: with a prelude in rhymes and an appendix ofsongs. New York: Vintage Books; 1974.
66. Boorse C. Health as a theoretical concept. Philos Sci. 1977;44:542.
67. Boorse C. A second rebuttal on health. J Med Philos. 2014;39(6):683-724. 10.1093/jmp/jhu035.
68. Daniels N. Just health: meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University ress; 2008.
69. Daniels N. Normal functioning and the treatment-enhancement distinction. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2000;9(03):309-22.
70. Schramme T. 'I hope that I get old before I die': ageing and the concept of disease. Theor Med Bioeth. 2013;34(3):171-87. 10.1007/s11017-013-9256-2.
71. Schramme T. Christopher Boorse and the philosophy of medicine. J Med Philos. 2014;39(6):565-71. 10.1093/jmp/jhu041.
72. Harris J. One principle and three fallacies of disability studies. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(6):383-7.
73. Hausman DM. Health and functional efficiency. J Med Philo. 2014;39(6):634-47.
74. Wakefield JC. Disorder as harmful dysfunction: a conceptual critique of DSM-III-R's definition of mental disorder. Psychol Rev. 1992;99(2):232-47.
75. Wakefield JC. The biostatistical theory versus the harmful dysfunction analysis, part 1: is part-dysfunction a sufficient condition for medical disorder? J Med Philos. 2014;39(6):648-82. 10.1093/jmp/jhu038.
76. Moen OM. Bright new world. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016;25(2):282-7. 10.1017/s0963180115000584.
77. Brock D. Messing with Mother Nature. Am Sci. 2002;90(5):479-80.
78. Parens EI. Better always good?: the enhancement project. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998;28(1):s1-s17.
79. Parens E. Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
80. Hauskeller M. Better Humans?: Understanding the Enhancement Project. New York: Routledge; 2014.
81. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books; 1999.
82. Vedder AH. Human enhancement on the slab. In: Lucivero F, Vedder AH, editors. RoboLaw Series. Dissecting some often used general distinctions and arguments in the ethical debate, vol 2: Pisa: Pisa University Press; 2013.
83. Lucivero F, Vedder A. Beyond therapy v. Enhancement?: multidisciplinary analyses of heated debate. Pisa: Pisa University Press; 2013.
84. Nordmann A, Rip A. Mind the gap revisited. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4(5):273.
85. Earp BD, Sandberg A, Kahane G, Savulescu J. When is diminishment a form of enhancement? Rethinking the enhancement debate in biomedical ethics. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:12. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00012.
86. Caviola L, Mannino A, Savulescu J, Faulmuller N. Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:195. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00195.
87. Maturo A. Medicalization: current concept and future directions in a bionic society. Mens Sana Monogr. 2012;10(1):122-33. 10.4103/0973-1229.91587.
88. Kaebnick GE. Reasons of the heart: emotion, rationality, and the "wisdom of repugnance". Hast Cent Rep. 2008;38(4):36-45.
89. Roache R, Clarke S. Bioconservatism, bioliberalism, and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009;28(1):4.1-21.
90. Giubilini A. Don't mind the gap: intuitions, emotions, and reasons in the enhancement debate. Hast Cent Rep. 2015;45(5):39-47. 10.1002/hast.458.
91. Rosoff PM. The myth of genetic enhancement. Theor Med Bioeth. 2012;33(3):163-78. 10.1007/s11017-012-9220-6.
92. Tranöy KE. Asymmetries in ethics: on the structure of a general theory of ethics. Inquiry. 1967;10(1-4):351-72.