Is there a problem with enhancement?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 5-14

  Kamm, Frances M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Designer babies; Distributive justice; Duty to aid; Enhancement; Genetic engineering; Intention; Nature; Parental love; Responsibility

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; CHILD; CHILD PARENT RELATION; ETHICS; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; GIFTED CHILD; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MORALITY; MOTIVATION; REVIEW; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THERAPY;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT; CHILD; CHILD, GIFTED; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; MOTIVATION; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; POLICY MAKING; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL VALUES; THERAPEUTICS;

EID: 27844505746     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590945101     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Kamm, F. 2004. Deciding whom to help, health-adjusted life years, and disabilities. In Public health, ethics, and equity, ed. S. Anand, F. Peters, and A. Sen, 225-242. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Nozick, R. 1977. Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
3. Sandel, M. 2004. The case against perfection. The Atlantic Monthly 293(3): 51-62.
4. Scanlon, T. 2000. Intention and permissibility I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Suppl. 74:301-317.
5. Scanlon, T. Blame. Unpublished article.
6. Shiffrin, S. 1999. Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm. Legal Theory 5(2):117-148.
7. Thomson, J. J. 1990. The realm of rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Thomson, J. J. 1999. Physician-assisted suicide: Two moral arguments. Ethics 109(3): 497-518.