The role of affordance in the experience of virtual reality learning: Technological and affective affordances in virtual reality

Telematics and Informatics

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1826-1836

  Shin, Dong Hee ^a  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Affordance; Amultimixed approach; Critical incident technique; Educational affordance; Virtual reality; Virtual reality learning

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; JOB ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SURVEYS; USER EXPERIENCE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AFFORDANCES; AMULTIMIXED APPROACH; CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE; EMBODIED COGNITION; HEURISTIC ASSESSMENT TOOL; REALITY LEARNING; TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITIES; VIRTUAL REALITY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 85029866334     PISSN: 07365853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.013     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Curry, M., Marshall, B., Kawalek, P., IT artifact bias. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34:4 (2014), 427–436, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.02.005.
2. Dalgarno, B., Lee, M., What are the learning affordances of 3D virtual environments?. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 41:1 (2010), 10–32, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x.
3. Erik, M.V.R., Jeroen, J.L.S., The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Comput. Edu. 50:3 (2008), 838–852, 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001.
4. Gibson, J.J., The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. 1986, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
5. Gross, D., Stanney, K., & Cohn, J. (2005). Evoking affordances in virtual environments via sensory-stimuli substitution. Presence, 14(4), 482–491.doi>10.1162/105474605774785244.
6. Huang, H., Liaw, S., Lai, C., Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24:1 (2016), 3–19, 10.1080/10494820.2013.817436.
7. Karanam, Y., Filko, L., Kaser, L., Alotaibi, H., Makhsoom, E., & Voida, S. (2014). Motivational affordances and personality types in personal informatics. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, p. 79–82.doi>10.1145/2638728.2638800.
8. Kim, J., Interacting socially with the Internet of Things (IoT). J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 21 (2016), 420–435, 10.1111/jcc4.12177.
9. Keller, C. (2009). User acceptance of virtual learning environments. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25, Article 38. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol25/iss1/38.
10. Kuo, Y., Feng, L., Relationships among community interaction characteristics, perceived benefits, community commitment, and oppositional brand loyalty in online brand communities. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33:6 (2013), 948–962.
11. Lee, K., Lee, S., & Hwang, Y. (2014). The impact of hyperlink affordance, psychological reactance, and perceived business tie on trust transfer. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 110–120. doi>10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.003.
12. Marc, F., & Christoph, L. (2008). User acceptance of virtual worlds. Journal of Electron. Consumer Research, 9(3), 231–242. doi>10.1145/1314234.1314250.
13. Nelson, S., Jarrahi, M., & Thomson, L. (2017). Mobility of knowledge work and affordances of digital technologies. International Journal of Information Management, 37 (2), 54–62. doi>10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.008.
14. Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Lygo-Baker, S., Ma, S., Why some teachers easily learn to use a new virtual learning environment. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24:3 (2016), 539–552, 10.1080/10494820.2014.881394.
15. Roldán-Álvarez, D., Martin, E., Garcia-Herranz, M., Haya, P., Mind the gap: impact on learnability of user interface design of authoring tools for teachers. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 94 (2016), 18–34 doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.011.
16. Saniye, T.T., Veysi, İ., Acceptance of virtual worlds as learning space. Innov. Edu. Teach. Int. 52:3 (2015), 254–264, 10.1080/14703297.2013.820139.
17. Shin, D., Lee, S., Hwang, Y., How do credibility and utility affect the user experience of health informatics services?. Comput. Hum. Behav. 67 (2017), 292–302, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.007.
18. Shin, D., Choi, M., Kim, J., Lee, J., Interaction, engagement, and perceived interactivity in single-handed interaction. Internet Res. 26:5 (2016), 1134–1157, 10.1108/IntR-12-2014-0312.
19. Shin, D., Quality of experience. Total Qual. Manag. 26:8 (2015), 919–932, 10.1080/14783363.2014.912037.
20. Shin, D., Ahn, D., Associations between game use and cognitive empathy. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Social Networking 16:8 (2013), 599–603, 10.1089/cyber.2012.0639.