Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 9, 2017, Pages

  Garrett, R Kelly ^a   Weeks, Brian E ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTUITION; MALE; TRUST; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; POLITICS; UNITED STATES;

CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; POLITICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85029584371     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184733     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Kuklinski JH, Quirk PJ, Jerit J, Schwieder D, Rich RF. Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship. The Journal of Politics. 2000; 62(03):790–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033
2. Jamieson KH. Implications of the Demise of “Fact” in Political Discourse. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 2015; 159(1):66–84.
3. World Public Opinion. Percentage of Americans Believing Iraq had WMD Rises; 2006. Available from: http://worldpublicopinion.net/percentage-of-americans-believing-iraq-had-wmd-rises/.
4. Pasek J, Stark TH, Krosnick JA, Tompson T. What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-Black attitudes. Electoral Studies. 2015; 40:482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009
5. Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Gignac GE. NASA Faked the Moon Landing - Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science. Psychological Science. 2013; 24 (5):622–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686 PMID: 23531484
6. Kahan DM. Fixing the communications failure. Nature. 2010; 463(7279):296–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/463296a PMID: 20090734
7. Nyhan B, Reifler J. When Corrections Fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior. 2010; 32(2):303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
8. Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2012; 13 (3):106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018 PMID: 26173286
9. Feinberg M, Willer R. The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes. Psychological Science. 2013; 24 (1):56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177 PMID: 23228937
10. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Oberauer K. The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(10):e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 PMID: 24098391
11. Miller JM, Saunders KL, Farhart CE. Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust. American Journal of Political Science. 2016; 60(4):824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
12. Kahan DM. Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study. Judgment and Decision Making. 2013; 8:407–424.
13. Feldman L, Hart PS, Milosevic T. Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public Understanding of Science. 2015; 26(4):481–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595348 PMID: 26229010
14. Schwarz N, Sanna LJ, Skurnik I, Yoon C. Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. vol. Volume 39. Academic Press; 2007. p. 127–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X
15. Seifert CM. The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? In: Brian HR, editor. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. vol. Volume 41. Academic Press; 2002. p. 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80009-3
16. Brotherton R, French CC. Intention Seekers: Conspiracist Ideation and Biased Attributions of Intentionality. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(5):e0124125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124125 PMID: 25970175
17. Oliver JE, Wood TJ. Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American Journal of Political Science. 2014; 58(4):952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
18. Brotherton R, Eser S. Bored to fears: Boredom proneness, paranoia, and conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015; 80:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.011
19. Dagnall N, Drinkwater K, Parker A, Denovan A, Parton M. Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015; 6(206). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206 PMID: 25762969
20. Uscinski JE, Klofstad C, Atkinson MD. What Drives Conspiratorial Beliefs? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions. Political Research Quarterly. 2016; 69(1):57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915621621
21. Whitson JA, Galinsky AD. Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception. Science. 2008; 322 (5898):115–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845 PMID: 18832647
22. Hofer BK. Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review. 2001; 13:353–383. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011965830686
23. Schommer M. Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1990; 82(3):498–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
24. Damasio A. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Penguin Publishing Group; 2005.
25. Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heier H. Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996; 71(2):390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390 PMID: 8765488
26. Newman E, Garry M, Bernstein D, Kantner J, Lindsay D. Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012; p. 1–6.
27. Kahan DM. Climate Science Communication and the Measurement Problem. Advances in political psychology. 2015; 36:1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244
28. Sokal A. Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
29. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
30. Schwarz N, Clore GL. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 385–407.
31. Baym G. From Cronkite to Colbert: the evolution of broadcast news. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers; 2010.
32. Swami V, Voracek M, Stieger S, Tran US, Furnham A. Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition. 2014; 133(3):572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 PMID: 25217762
33. Garrett RK, Weeks BE, Neo RL. Driving a wedge between evidence and beliefs: How online ideological news exposure promotes political misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2016; 21(5):331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12164
34. Kuklinski JH, Quirk PJ, Schweider D, Rich RF. ‘Just the Facts, Ma’am’: Political facts and political opinion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1998; 560:143–154.
35. Shibutani T. Improvised news: a sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill; 1966.
36. Uscinski JE, Butler RW. The Epistemology of Fact Checking. Critical Review. 2013; 25(2):162–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843872
37. Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1979.
38. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm - An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine. 2012; 30(25):3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112 PMID: 22172504
39. Boghossian P. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2006.
40. Jasanoff S. Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science. Social Studies of Science. 1996; 26(2):393–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026002008
41. Latour B. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry. 2004; 30(2):225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
42. Harding P, Hare W. Portraying Science Accurately in Classrooms: Emphasizing Open-Mindedness Rather Than Relativism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2000; 37(3):225–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3%3C225::AID-TEA1%3E3.0.CO;2-G
43. Lodge M, Taber CS. The Rationalizing Voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
44. Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum Sample Size Recommendations for Conducting Factor Analyses. International Journal of Testing. 2005; 5(2):159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
45. Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods. 1998; 2(1):104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
46. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999; 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
47. Murphy KR, Davidshofer CO. Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2005.
48. Enders CK. Applied Missing Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Publications; 2010.
49. Jerit J, Barabas J. Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment. The Journal of Politics. 2012; 74(03):672–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000187
50. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental process. Psychological Review. 1977; 84(3):231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
51. Prior M, Sood G, Khanna K. You Cannot be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 2015; 10(4):489–518. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014127
52. Hemingway M. Lies, damned lies, and ‘fact checking’. The Weekly Standard. 2011; 17(14).
53. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2010.