Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers’ coverage of climate change

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 481-497

  Feldman, Lauren ^a   Hart, P Sol ^b   Milosevic, Tijana ^c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

climate change; media representations; science journalism

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; MASS MEDIUM; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

CLIMATE CHANGE; JOURNALISM; MASS MEDIA; NEWSPAPERS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85018912004     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662515595348     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alliance for Audited Media (2013) Top 25 U.S. newspaper for March 2013. Available at: http://www.auditedmedia.com/news/blog/top-25-us-newspapers-for-march-2013.aspx
2. Bennett WL, (2009) News: The Politics of Illusion, 8th edn. New York, NY: Longman.
3. Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S, (2007) When the Press Fails. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Boykoff MT, (2007a) Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area 39(4): 470–481. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x.
5. Boykoff MT, (2007b) From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32(4): 477–489. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.
6. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM, (2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change 14: 125–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.
7. Brüggemann M, Engesser S, (2014) Between consensus and denial climate journalists as interpretive community. Science Communication 36(4): 399–427. DOI: 1075547014533662.
8. Byrne S, Hart PS, (2009) The boomerang effect: A synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. In: Beck CA, (ed.) Communication Yearbook 33. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 3–37.
9. Cappella JN, Jamieson KH, (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. Carvalho A, (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science 16(2): 223–243. DOI: 10.1177/0963662506066775.
11. Craig SC, Niemi RG, Silver GE, (1990) Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior 12(3): 289–314. DOI: 10.1007/BF00992337.
12. Curry AL, Hammonds KH, (2014) The power of solutions journalism. A joint report of the Engaging News Report and Solutions Journalism Network. Available at: http://solutionsjournalism.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ENP_SJN-report.pdf
13. D’Alessio D, Allen M, (2000) Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication 50(4): 133–156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02866.x.
14. Druckman JN, Parkin M, (2005) The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. Journal of Politics 67(4): 1030–1049. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00349.x.
15. Dudo AD, Dahlstrom MF, Brossard D, (2007) Reporting a potential pandemic: A risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in U.S. newspapers. Science Communication 28: 429–454. DOI: 10.1177/1075547007302211.
16. Dunlap RE, McCright AM, (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–160.
17. Entman RM, (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.
18. Entman RM, Rojecki A, (1993) Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement. Political Communication 10(2): 155–173. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962973.
19. Evensen DT, Clarke C, (2012) Efficacy information in media coverage of infectious disease risks: An ill predicament? Science Communication 34: 392–418. DOI: 10.1177/1075547011421020.
20. Feinberg M, Willer R, (2011) Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological Science 22(1): 34–38. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610391911.
21. Feldman L, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A, (2012) Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. International Journal of Press/Politics 17(1): 3–31. DOI: 10.1177/1940161211425410.
22. Feldman L, Myers TA, Hmielowski JD, Leiserowitz A, (2014) The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication 65(4): 590–611. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12108.
23. Finkel SE, (1985) Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29(4): 891–913. DOI: 10.2307/2111186.
24. Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM, (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers. Econometrica 78(1): 35–71. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA7195.
25. Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM, (2011) Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 1799–1839. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr044.
26. Gibson TA, Craig RT, Harper AC, Alpert JM, (2015) Covering global warming in dubious times: Environmental reporters in the new media ecosystem. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 4 January. DOI: 10.1177/1464884914564845.
27. Groseclose T, Milyo J, (2005) A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4): 1191–1237. DOI: 10.1162/003355305775097542.
28. Guber D, (2012) A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist 57(1): 93–115. DOI: 10.1177/0002764212463361.
29. Hart PS, Feldman L, (2014) Threat without efficacy? Climate change on U.S. network news. Science Communication 36(3): 325–351.
30. Hmielowski JD, Feldman L, Myers TA, Leiserowitz A, (2014) An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science 23(7): 866–883. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513480091.
31. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J. (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Available at: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
32. Layman GC, Carsey TM, Horowitz JM, (2006) Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83–110. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138.
33. Lemert JB, (1977) Journalists and mobilizing information. Journalism Quarterly 54(4): 721–726.
34. Lemert JB, (1984) News context and the elimination of mobilizing information: An experiment. Journalism Quarterly 61(2): 243–259.
35. Levendusky M, (2013) How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L, (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17(3–4): 445–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004.
37. Lubell M, (2003) Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly 56(3): 309–323. DOI: 10.1177/106591290305600306.
38. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly 52(2): 155–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
39. Maibach EW, Nisbet MC, Baldwin P, Akerlof K, Diao G, (2010) Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10(1): 299–309. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-299.
40. Markowitz EM, Shariff AF, (2012) Climate change and moral judgment. Nature Climate Change 2(4): 243–247. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1378.
41. Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW, (2014) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Available at: http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/downloads
42. Mullainathan S, Shleifer A, (2005) The market for news. American Economic Review 95: 1031–1053. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132704
43. National Science Board (2014) Science and Engineering Indicators 2014 (NSB 14–01). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/
44. Nicodemus DM, (2004) Mobilizing information: Local news and the formation of a viable political community. Political Communication 21: 161–176. DOI: 10.1080/10584600490443868.
45. Nisbet MC, (2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science & Policy for Sustainable Development 51(2): 12–23.
46. Nisbet MC, (2011) Climate shift: Clear vision for the next decade of public debate. Available at: http://climateshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ClimateShift_report_June2011.pdf
47. Ockwell D, Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S, (2009) Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation. Science Communication 30(3): 305–327. DOI: 10.1177/1075547008328969.
48. O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S, (2009) “Fear won’t do it” Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 30(3): 355–379. DOI: 10.1177/1075547008329201.
49. Patterson T, (2013) Informing the News. New York, NY: Vintage.
50. Romero-Lankao P, Smith JB, Davidson DJ, Diffenbaugh NS, Kinney PL, Kirshen P. (2014) North America. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Billir TE. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, & Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/WGIIAR5-Chap26_FINAL.pdf
51. Rosenstone SJ, Hansen JM, (2003) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America, 1st edn. New York, NY: Pearson.
52. Russell C, (2010) Covering controversial science: Improving reporting on science and public policy. In: Kennedy D, Overholser G, (eds) Science and the Media. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 13–43.
53. Stroud NJ, (2011) Niche News. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54. Witte K, (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs 59(4): 329–349. DOI: 10.1080/03637759209376276.