Political Fact-Checking on Twitter: When Do Corrections Have an Effect?

Political Communication

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 196-219

  Margolin, Drew B ^a   Hannak, Aniko ^b   Weber, Ingmar ^c  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HAMAD BIN KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (Qatar)

Author keywords

accountability; fact checking; misinformation; rumor; social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029449252     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334018     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allport,G. W., & Postman, L., (1947). The psychology of rumor. Oxford, UK: Henry Holt.
2. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S., (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ.: Princeton university press Princeton.
3. Asch, S. E., (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In H., Geutzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. 222–236, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.
4. Asch, S. E., (1956). Studies of independence and conformities. Psychological Monographs, General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.
5. Austen-Smith, D., & Feddersen, T. J., (2009). Information aggregation and communication in committees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1518), 763–769. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0256
6. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L., (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.
7. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S., (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi:10.1111/jcom.2008.58.issue-4
8. Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W., (2015). Science vs. conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0118093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093
9. Bimber, B. A., (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H., (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. doi:10.1038/nature11421
11. Burt, R. S., (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press.
12. Burton-Chellew, M. N., Ross-Gillespie, A., & West, S. A., (2010). Cooperation in humans: Competition between groups and proximate emotions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(2), 104–108. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.07.005
13. Choi, S., (2014). Flow, diversity, form, and influence of political talk in social-media-based public forums. Human Communication Research, 40(2), 209–237. doi:10.1111/hcre.12023
14. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H., (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York/Little Brown.
15. Cohen, T. R., Montoya, R. M., & Insko, C. A., (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1559–1572. doi:10.1177/0146167206291673
16. Coleman, J. S., (1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943
17. Conover, M. D., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F., (2012). Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science, 1(1), 1–19. doi:10.1140/epjds6
18. Crease, R. P., (2011). World in the balance: The historic quest for an absolute system of measurement. New York/W.W. Norton.
19. Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S., & Lazer, D., (2009). Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15274–15278. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900282106
20. Einwiller, S. A., & Kamins, M. A., (2008). Rumor has it: The moderating effect of identification on rumor impact and the effectiveness of rumor refutation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(9), 2248–2272. doi:10.1111/jasp.2008.38.issue-9
21. Elga, A., (2011). Reflection and disagreement. In A. I., Goldman & D., Whitcomb (Eds.), Social epistemology: Essential readings (pp. 158–182). Oxford, England; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Ellwardt, L., Steglich, C., & Wittek, R., (2012). The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks. Social Networks, 34(4), 623–633. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.07.002
23. Enns, P. K., (2015). Relative policy support and coincidental representation. Perspectives on Politics, 13(04), 1053–1064. doi:10.1017/S1537592715002315
24. Eveland, W. P., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J., (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082–1103. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x
25. Friggeri, A., Adamic, L. A., Eckles, D., & Cheng, J., (2014). Rumor cascades. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 101–110). Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/download/8122/8110
26. Garrett, R. K., (2011). Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research, 37(2), 255–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01401.x
27. Garrett, R. K., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K., (2013). Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and naïve theory. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 617–637. doi:10.1111/jcom.12038
28. Giglietto, F., Iannelli, L., Rossi, L., & Valeriani, A., (2016). Fakes, news and the election: A new taxonomy for the study of misleading information within the hybrid media system. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2878774
29. González-Bailón, S., Wang, N., & Borge-Holthoefer, J., (2014). The emergence of roles in large-scale networks of communication. EPJ Data Science, 3(1), 1–16. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0032-y
30. Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Winneg, K. M., & Jamieson, K. H., (2013). Did fact checking matter in the 2012 presidential campaign?American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1558–1567. doi:10.1177/0002764213489012
31. Grice, H. P., (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 225–242). New York: Seminar Press.
32. Hannak, A., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., & Weber, I., (2014). Get back! You don’t know me like that: The social mediation of fact checking interventions in Twitter conversations. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 187–196). Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/viewPDFInterstitial/8115/8119
33. Himelboim, I., (2010). Civil society and online political discourse: The network structure of unrestricted discussions. Communication Research, 38(5), 634–659. doi:10.1177/0093650210384853
34. Hofer, M., & Aubert, V., (2013). Perceived bridging and bonding social capital on Twitter: Differentiating between followers and followees. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2134–2142. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.038
35. Kahan, D. M., (2012). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424.
36. Katz, E., (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78. doi:10.1086/266687
37. Koudenburg, N., Postmes, T., & Gordijn, E. H., (2016). Beyond content of conversation: The role of conversational form in the emergence and regulation of social structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, (21) 50–71. doi:10.1177/1088868315626022
38. Krippendorff, K., (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Lazer, D., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N., & Neblo, M., (2010). The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication, 27(3), 248–274. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.500187
40. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E., (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
41. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J., (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
42. Lin, Y., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., & Lazer, D., (2013). Voices of Victory: A Computational Focus Group Framework for Tracking Opinion Shift in Real Time. 22nd International World Wide Web Conference (pp. 737–748). Rio.
43. Lin, Y.-R., Keegan, B., Margolin, D., & Lazer, D., (2014). Rising tides or rising stars? Dynamics ofshared attention on Twitter during media events. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e94093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094093
44. Maireder, A., & Schlogl, S., (2014). 24 hours of an #outcry: The networked publics of a socio-political debate. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 687–702. doi:10.1177/0267323114545710
45. Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D., (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
46. Meeder, B., Karrer, B., Sayedi, A., Ravi, R., Borgs, C., & Chayes, J., (2011). We know who you followed last summer: Inferring social link creation times in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 517–526). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1963405.1963479
47. Mocanu, D., Rossi, L., Zhang, Q., Karsai, M., & Quattrociocchi, W., (2015). Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1198–1204. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.024
48. Monge, P., & Contractor, N., (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49. Moody, J., & White, D. R., (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127. doi:10.2307/3088904
50. Moon, S., (2011). Analysis of Twitter unfollow: How often do people unfollow in Twitter and why? In International Conference on Social Informatics (p. 7). Springer.
51. Morey, A. C., Eveland, W. P., & Hutchens, M. J., (2012). The “who” matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication, 29(1), 86–103. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.641070
52. Mutz, D. C., (2008). Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 521–538. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070308
53. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J., (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
54. Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M., (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
55. Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N., (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 547–568. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007
56. Shapin, S., (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England.
57. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I., (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change, University of Chicago.
58. Shin, J., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F., (2016). Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 1–22. doi:10.1177/1461444816634054
59. Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., & Milinski, M., (2008). Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1650), 2529–2536. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0762
60. Song, H., (2015). Uncovering the structural underpinnings of political discussion networks: Evidence from an exponential random graph model: Underpinnings of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 65(1), 146–169. doi:10.1111/jcom.12140
61. Stroud, N. J., (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. doi:10.1111/jcom.2010.60.issue-3
62. Sunstein, C. R., (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C., (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33, 47.
64. Tetlock, P. E., (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109(3), 451–471. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.451
65. Turner, J. C., (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1–34. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102
66. Uzzi, B., (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67. doi:10.2307/2393808
67. Varnelis, K., (2012). Networked publics. MA/MIT Press, Cambridge.
68. Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S., (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458. doi:10.1086/518527
69. Weeks, B. E., (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699–719. doi:10.1111/jcom.12164
70. Wilson, E. O., (2012). The social conquest of earth. W.W. Norton & Company. Liveright Pub. Corp, New York.
71. Xu, B., Huang, Y., Kwak, H., & Contractor, N., (2013). Structures of broken ties: Exploring unfollow behavior on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 871–876). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441875