Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction

New Media and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1214-1235

  Shin, Jieun ^a   Jian, Lian ^a   Driscoll, Kevin ^b   Bar, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Elections; partisan homophily; political communication; rumor; satire; social media

Indexed keywords

EID: 85026760600     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444816634054     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adamic LA, Glance N, (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, New York, 21 August.
2. Allport GW, Postman LJ, (1945) The basic psychology of rumor. Transactions of the New York Academy Sciences 8(2): 61–81.
3. Allport GW, Postman LJ, (1947) An analysis of rumor. The Public Opinion Quarterly 10(4): 501–517.
4. Barbera P, Jost JT, Nagler J. (2015) Tweeting from left to right: is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science 26: 1531–1542.
5. Bekafigo MA, McBride A, (2013) Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011 gubernatorial elections. Social Science Computer Review 31(5): 625–643.
6. Benkler Y, (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Bode L, Hanna A, Yang J. (2015) Candidate networks, citizen clusters, and political expression: strategic hashtag use in the 2010 midterms. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659(1): 149–165.
8. Boutet A, Kim H, Yoneki E, (2012) What’s in Twitter: I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, New York, pp. 129–132. Available at: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~ey204/pubs/2012_ASONAM.pdf
9. Boyd D, Golder S, Lotan G, (2010) Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. HICSS-43. Kauai, HI: IEEE.
10. Bruns A, Burgess (2011) The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Paper presented at the European consortium for political research conference. Available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46515/1/The_Use_of_Twitter_Hashtags_in_the_Formation_of_Ad_Hoc_Publics_%28final%29.pdf
11. Bruns A, Highfield T, (2013) Political networks on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 667–691.
12. Byrne S, Hart PS, (2009) The boomerang effect: a synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. Communication Yearbook 33: 3–37.
13. Cacciatore M, Yeo SK, Scheufele DA. (2014) Misperceptions in polarized politics: the role of knowledge, religiosity, and media. PS: Political Science & Politics 27: 654–661.
14. Colleoni E, Rozza A, Arvidsson A, (2014) Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication 64(2): 317–332.
15. Conover MD, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco M. (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. In: Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/viewFile/2847/3275
16. DiFonzo N, Bordia P, (2007) Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. DiFonzo N, Bourgeois M, Suls J. (2013) Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: dynamic social impact and self-organization of hearsay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(3): 378–399.
18. DiFonzo N, Suls J, Beckstead JW. (2014) Network structure moderates intergroup differentiation of stereotyped rumors. Social Cognition 32(5): 409–448.
19. Driscoll K, Walker S, (2014) Working within a black box: transparency in the collection and production of big Twitter data. International Journal of Communication 8: 1745–1764.
20. Farrell H, (2012) The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 35–52.
21. Festinger L, (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Peterson.
22. Friggeri A, Adamic LA, Eckles D. (2014) Rumor cascades. In: Proceedings of the eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, pp. 101–110. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/viewFile/8122/8110
23. Garrett RK, (2009a) Echo chamber online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 14(2): 256–285.
24. Garrett RK, (2009b) Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication 59(4): 676–699.
25. Garrett RK, (2011) Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research 37(2): 255–274.
26. González-Bailón S, Wang N, Rivero A. (2012) Assessing the Bias in Communication Networks Sampled from Twitter. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.1684
27. Gottfried JA, Hardy BW, Winneg KM. (2013) Did fact checking matter in the 2012 presidential campaign? American Behavioral Scientist 57(11): 1558–1567.
28. Hannak A, Margolin D, Keegan B. (2014) Get back! You don’t know me like that: the social mediation of fact checking interventions in Twitter conversation. In: Proceedings of the eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Available at: http://www.brianckeegan.com/papers/ICWSM_2014.pdf
29. Himelboim I, McCreery S, Smith M, (2013) Birds of a feather tweet together: integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18(2): 40–60.
30. Jacobson S, Myung E, Johnson SL, (2015) Open media or echo chamber: the use of links in audience discussions on the Facebook pages of partisan news organizations. Information, Communication & Society 19(7): 875–891
31. Kim J, (2011) The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: the relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior 27: 971–977.
32. Knobloch-Westerwick S, Kleinman SB, (2012) Preelection selective exposure: confirmation bias versus information utility. Communication Research 39(2): 170–193.
33. Knobloch-Westerwick S, Johnson BK, Westerwick A, (2015) Confirmation bias in online searches: impacts of selective exposure before an election on political attitude strength and shifts. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 20(2): 171–187.
34. Kwak H, Lee C, Moon S, (2010) What is Twitter, a social network or a news media. In: Proceedings of the 19th world-wide web (WWW) conference, Raleigh, NC, 26–30 April.
35. Larsson AO, Moe H, (2011) Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society 14(5): 729–747.
36. McKinney MS, Houston B, Hawthorne J, (2014) Social watching a 2012 republican presidential primary debate. American Behavioral Scientist 58(4): 556–573.
37. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM, (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.
38. Marwick AE, boyd d, (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133.
39. Nagarajan M, Purohit H, Sheth A, (2010) A qualitative examination of topical tweet and retweet practices. In: Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1484/1880
40. Nyhan B, Reifler J, (2010) When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32(2): 303–330.
41. Nyhan B, Reifler J, (2012) Misinformation and fact-checking: research findings from social science. New America Foundation Media Policy Initiative Research Paper. Available at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/Misinformation_and_Fact-checking.pdf
42. Papacharissi Z, (2009) The virtual sphere 2.0: the internet, the public sphere and beyond. In: Chadwick A, Howard P, (eds) Handbook of Internet Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 230–245.
43. Park CS, (2013) Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 29(4): 1641–1648.
44. Rainie L, Smith A, (2012) Social networking sites and politics. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SocialMediaAndPoliticalEngagement_PDF.pdf
45. Riffe D, Lacy S, Fico FG, (1998) Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. London: Routledge.
46. Rojecki A, Meraz S, (2014) Rumors and factitious informational blends: the role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society 18(1): 25–43.
47. Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT, (2008) Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105(4): 1118–1123.
48. Shibutani T, (1966) Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
49. Smith MA, Rainie L, Shneiderman B. (2014) Mapping Twitter topic networks. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/20/part-2-conversational-archetypes-six-conversation-and-group-network-structures-in-twitter/
50. Sunstein C, (2009) On Rumors. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
51. Tonkin E, Pfeiffer HD, Tourte G, (2012) Twitter, information sharing and the London riots? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 38(2): 49–57.
52. Wasserman S, Faust K, (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Weeks BE, (2015) Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: how anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication 65: 699–719.
54. Weeks BE, Garrett RK, (2014) Electoral consequences of political rumors: motivated reasoning, candidate rumors, and vote choice during the 2008 U.S. presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(4): 401–422.
55. Williams H, McMurray JR, Kurz T. (2015) Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Enviornmental Change 32: 126–138.
56. World Economic Forum (2014) The rapid spread of misinformation online. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/outlook-14/top-ten-trends-category-page/10-the-rapid-spread-of-misinformation-online/