Graduate teaching assistants' assessment of students' problem formulation within Model-Eliciting Activities

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Salim, Amani ^a   Diefes Dux, Heidi ^a  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING PROBLEMS; EXPERT ASSESSMENT; FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING; GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANTS; MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIES; PROBLEM FORMULATION; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; STUDENT RESPONSE;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85029089000     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Ang, T.S.L., D.R. Arnott, and P.A. O'Donnell. 1994. Problem formulation and decision support systems development. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Information Systems. Monash University, Melbourne.
2. Mintzberg, H., D. Raisinghani, and A. Theoret. 1976 The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21: 246-275.
3. Volkema, R.J. 1983 Problem formulation in planning and design. Management Science 29(6): 639-652.
4. Coman, D. 1986. Developing a process model of problem recognition. Academy of Management Review 11(14): 763-776.
5. Jackman, J., S. Ryan, C. Ogilvie, and D. Niederhauser. 2008 Scaffolding to improve reasoning skills in problem formulation. In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Pittsburgh, PA.
6. Atman, C., K. Yasuhara, R.S. Adams, T.J. Barker, J. Turns, and E. Rhone. Breadth in problem scoping: A comparison of freshman and senior engineering students. 2008. International Journal of Engineering Education 42(2): 234-245.
7. Atman, C., D. Kilgore, and A. Morozov. 2007. Breadth in design problem scoping: Using insights from experts to investigate student processes. In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Honolulu, HI.
8. Neeley, K.A., D. Elzey, D. Bauer, and P. Marshall. 2004. Engineering in context: A multidisciplinary team capstone experience, incorporating real world constraints. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Salt Lake City, UT.
9. Elzey, D. 2006. Teaching intro to engineering in context - UVA engineering's new cornerstone. In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Chicago, IL.
10. Rogers, G. 2005 Assessment: The ultimate open-ended design problems. Communication Link. Baltimore, MD.:ABET:14-15.
11. Banta, T.W, (Ed.). 2004. Hallmarks of Effective Outcomes Assessment: Assessment Update Collections. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.
12. ABET (2009). Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering. Baltimore, MD: ABET. http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml#For-Engineering-Programs-Only (last accessed, March 15 2010).
13. Angelo, T.A., and K.P. Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. 2nd Edition. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.
14. Zawojewski, J.S., H. Diefes-Dux, and K.J. Bowman, (Eds). 2008. Models and Modeling in Engineering Education. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
15. Diefes-Dux, H.A., and P.K. Imbrie. 2008. Modeling Activities in a First-Year Engineering Course. In Models and modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students, eds. J.S. Zawojewski, H. Diefes-Dux, and K..J. Bowman, 55-92. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
16. Diefes-Dux, H.A., and P.K. Imbrie. 2008. Model Development Sequence. In Models and modeling in Engineering Education: Designing experiences for all student, eds. J.S. Zawojewski, H. Diefes-Dux, and K.J. Bowman, 37-54. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
17. Caroll, W.M. 1999. Using short questions to develop and assess reasoning. In Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12. Reston, VA.: NCTM.
18. Lesh, R., M. Hoover, B. Hole, A. Kelly, and T. Post. 2000. Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education eds. A.E. Kelly and R.A. Lesh, 591-645. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Diefes-Dux, H.A., T. Moore, and J. Zawojewski. 2004. A Framework for Posing Open-Ended Engineering Problems: Model Eliciting Activities. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference. Savannah, GA.