Social equity in governance of ecosystem services: Synthesis from European treeline areas

Climate Research

Volumn 73, Issue 1-2, 2017, Pages 31-44

  Sarkki, Simo ^a,b   Jokinen, Mikko ^c   Nijnik, Maria ^d   Zahvoyska, Lyudmyla ^e   Abraham, Eleni M ^f   Alados, Concepcin L ^g   Bellamy, Chloe ^h   Bratanova Dontcheva, Svetla ⁱ   Grunewald, Karsten ^j   Kollar, Jozef ^k   Krajč, Ján ^l   Kyriazopoulos, Apostolos P ^m   Porta, Nicola La ^n,o   Monteiro, Antonio T ^p   Munoz Rojas, Jose ^d   Parpan, Taras ^q   Sing, Louise ^h   Smith, Mike ^h   Sutinen, Marja Liisa ^c   Tolvanen, Anne ^c   Zhyla, Tetiana ^e   more..

^a Faculty of Humanities   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^e UKRAINIAN NATIONAL FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (Ukraine)

^f ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^g INSTITUTO PIRENAICO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^h FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ INSTITUTE OF BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH   (Bulgaria)

^j LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGICAL URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^k INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^l Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources ^*  (Slovakia)

^m DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

ⁿ RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^o EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^p CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^q Ukrainian Research Institute of Mountain Forestry   (Ukraine)

more..

Author keywords

Altitudinal latitudinal treeline; Climate change; Governance of ecosystem service; Land use; Multifunctional landscapes; Social equity; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EQUITY; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LAND USE CHANGE; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; STAKEHOLDER; TREELINE;

EUROPE;

EID: 85028950013     PISSN: 0936577X     EISSN: 16161572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/cr01441     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agrawal A, Gibson C (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Dev 27: 629-649
2. Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (eds) (2003) Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Earthscan, London
3. Armand AD (1992) Sharp and gradual mountain timberlines as result of species interaction. In: Hansen AJ, di Castri F (eds) Landscape boundaries. Springer, New York, NY, p 360-378.
4. Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC
5. Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1-25.
6. Briner S, Huber R, Bebi P, Elkin C, Schmatz DR, Grět-Regamey A (2013) Trade-offs between ecosystem ser-vices in a mountain region. Ecol Soc 18(3): 35
7. Corbera E (2012) Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4: 612-619
8. Corbera E, Kosoy N, Tuna MM (2007) Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Glob Environ Change 17: 365-380
9. Elo S, Kyngäs H (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62: 107-115
10. Farrell KN (2014) Intellectual mercantilism and franchise equity: a critical study of the ecological political economy of international payments for ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 102: 137-146
11. Gibson RB (2006) Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8: 259-280
12. GløersenE,PriceMF,Borec A,DaxT, GiordanoB(2016) Cohesion in mountainous regions of the EU: Research for REGI Committee. Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Regional Development. European Parliament, Brussels. www. europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/573420/IPOL-STU(2016)573420-EN.pdf
13. Grabherr G (2009) Biodiversity in the high ranges of the Alps: ethnobotanical and climate change perspectives. Glob Environ Change 19: 167-172
14. Grět-Regamey A, Brunner SH, Kienast F (2012) Mountain ecosystems services: Who cares? Mt Res Dev 32(S1): S23-S34
15. Grět-Regamey A, Brunner SH, Altwegg J, Christen M, Bebi P (2013) Integrating expert knowledge into mapping ecosystem services trade-offs for sustainable forest management. Ecol Soc 18(3): 34
16. Gustafsson L, Baker SC, Bauhus J, Beese WJ and others (2012) Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective. Bioscience 62: 633-645
17. Hastik R, Basso S, Geitner C, Haida C and others (2015) Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 48: 608-623
18. Hauck J, Görg C, Varjopuro R, Ratamäki O, Jax K (2013) Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem service concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environ Sci Policy 25: 13-21
19. Heikkinen HI, Sarkki S, Jokinen M, Fornander DE (2010) Global area conservation ideals versus the local realities of reindeer herding in northernmost Finland. Int J Business Globalization 4: 110-130
20. Hofgaard A, Tømmervik H, Rees G, Hanssen F (2013) Latitudinal forest advance in northernmost Norway since the early 20th century. J Biogeogr 40: 938-949
21. Howe A, Suichb H, Virac B, Mace GM (2014) Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-Analysis of ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies in the real world. Glob Environ Change 28: 263-275
22. Howlett M, Rayner J (2007) Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in 'New Governance Arrangements'. Policy Soc 26: 1-18
23. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15: 1277-1288
24. Huber R, Rigling A, Bebi P, Brand FS and others (2013) Sustainable land use in mountain regions under global change: synthesis across scales and disciplines. Ecol Soc 18(3): 36
25. Jokinen M, Sarkki S, Heikkinen HI (in press) The wellbeing effects of localized multi-level environmental governance: case of Kilpisjärvi. Nordia Geographical Publications Yearbook 2016
26. Jordan A (2000) The politics of multilevel environmental governance: subsidiarity and environmental policy in the European Union. Environ Plann A 32: 1307-1324
27. Körner C (2012) Alpine treelines: functional ecology of the high elevation tree limits. Springer, Basel
28. Kullman L, Øberg L (2009) Post-Little Ice Age tree line rise and climate warming in the Swedish Scandes: a landscape ecological perspective. J Ecol 97: 415-429
29. Lakerveld RP, Lele S, Crane TA, Fortuin KPJ, Spingate-Bakinski O (2015) The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: evidence and insights from Odisha India. Ecosyst Serv 14: 56-66
30. Lundholm C (2011) Society's response to environmental challenges: citizenship and the role of knowledge. Factis Pax 5: 80-96
31. MA (Millennium Assessment) (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystem and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC
32. McDermott M, Mahanty S, Schreckenberg K (2013) Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environ Sci Policy 33: 416-427
33. O'Farrell PJ, Anderson PML (2010) Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2: 59-65
34. Ostrom E (2010) Polycentric systems for coping with col-lective action and global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 20: 550-557
35. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19: 354-365
36. Pascual U, Phelps J, Garmendia E, Brown K and others (2014) Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. Bioscience 64: 1027-1036
37. Petheram L, Campbell BM (2010) Listening to locals on payment for environmental services. J Environ Manage 91: 1139-1149
38. Primmer E, Jokinen P, Blicharska M, Barton DN, Bugter R, Potschin M (2015) Governance of ecosystem services: a framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services 16: 158-166
39. Puhakka R, Sarkki S, Cottrell SP, Siikamäki P (2009) Local discourses and international initiatives: sociocultural sustainability of tourism in Oulanka National Park, Finland. J Sustain Tour 17: 529-549
40. Rauschmayer F, van den Hove S, Koetz T (2009) Partici-pation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric? Environ Plann C Gov Policy 27: 42-58
41. Redpath SM, Young J, Evely A, Adams WM and others (2013) Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 100-109
42. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141: 2417-2431
43. Ring I, Schröte-Schlaack C (eds) (2011) Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. POLICYMIX Report 2/2011, Helm-holtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leip-zig. http://policymix.nina.no/Portals/policymix/POLICY MIX %20Report-No%202-2011.pdf (accessed on 30 Dec 2015)
44. Sarkki S, Heikkinen HI, Karjalainen TP (2013) Sensitivity in transdisciplinary projects: case of reindeer management in northern Finland. Land Use Policy 34: 183-192
45. Sarkki S, Ficko A, Grunewald K, Nijnik M (2015a) Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance. Reg Environ Chang 16: 2019-2032
46. Sarkki S, Rantala L, Karjalainen TP (2015b) Fit between conservation instruments and local social systems: cases of co-management and payments for ecosystem services. Change Adapt Socio-Ecol Syst 2: 59-78
47. Sarvaŝová Z, Cienciala E, Beranová J, Vano M, Ficko A,Pardos M 2014 Analysis of governance systems applied in multifunctional forest management in selected European mountain regions For J 60 159-167
48. Schlosberg D (2007) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements and nature. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
49. Walker GP (2007) Environmental justice and the distributional deficit in policy appraisal in the UK. Environ Res Lett 2: 045004
50. Webler T (1995) Right discourse in citizen participation: an evaluative yardstick. In: Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds) Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 35-86.
51. Wegner G, Pascual U (2011) Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique. Glob Environ Change 21: 492-504.
52. Wunder S (2013) When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. Conserv Lett 6: 230-237