Listening to locals on payments for environmental services

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1139-1149

  Petheram, Lisa ^a   Campbell, Bruce M ^b  

^a CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Indigenous people; Integrated conservation and development; Local perspectives, natural resource management; Vietnam

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; LOCAL PLANNING; NATIONAL PARK; NATURE CONSERVATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; FEE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; NATIONAL PARK; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; POVERTY; VIET NAM;

VIET NAM;

EID: 77949263587     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aylward B., Echeverría J., Fernández González A., Porras I.T., Allen K., and Mejías K. Economic Incentives for Watershed Protection: A Case Study of Lake Arenal, Costa Rica. CREED Final Report (1998), International Institute for Environment and Development, London
2. Berger P.L., and Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in Sociology of Knowledge (1967), Anchor Books, New York
3. Bracer C., Scherr S., Molnar A., Sekher M., Ochieng B.O., and Sriskanthan G. Organization and Governance for Fostering Pro-poor Compensation for Environmental Services: CES Scoping Study Issue Paper No. 4. ICRAF Working Paper no. 39 (2007), World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya
4. Bui Dung The, Dang Thanh Ha, and Nguyen Quoc Chinh. Rewarding Upland Farmers for Environmental Services: Experience, Constraints and Potential in Vietnam (2004), World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Southeast Asia
5. Cat Tien National Park. An Annual Report on the Real Situation and Results of Forest Protection Contract in 2004 (2005), Cat Tien National Park, Dong Nai
6. Cochrane P. Exploring cultural capital and its importance in sustainable development. Ecological Economics 57 (2006) 318-330
7. Colchester M., and Fay C. Land, Forest and People Facing the Challenges in South-East Asia, Rights and Resources Initiative Listening, Learning and Sharing. Asia Final Report (2007). http://www.recoftc.org/site/fileadmin/docs/publications/The_Grey_Zone/20 07/Land_Forests_and_People.pdf (accessed 08.03.09)
8. Corbera E., Kosoy N., and Martínez Tuna M. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America Global. Environmental Change 17 (2007) 365-380
9. Department for International Development (DFID). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets (1999), Department for International Development, London
10. Dobbs T.L., and Pretty J. Case study of agri-environmental payments: the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 65 4 (2008) 765-775
11. Echavarría M., Vogel J., Albán M., and Meneses F. The Impacts of Payments for Watershed Services in Ecuador, No. 4 (2004), IIED, London
12. Fagerstrom M.H. Progress Report on Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam (2006), World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Region Program/Vietnam Office, Hanoi, Vietnam
13. Farjon A., Thomas P., and Nguyen Duc To Luu. Conifer conservation in Vietnam: three potential flagship species. Oryx 38 3 (2004) 257-265
14. Ferraro P., and Kiss A. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 29 (2002) 1718-1719
15. Ferraro P., and Simpson R. The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Economics 78 (2002) 339-353
16. In: Glaser B.G. (Ed). More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader (1994), Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA
17. In: Hoang M.H., van Noordwijk M., and Pham Thu Thuy (Eds). Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam - Lessons and Experiences in Vietnam (2008), World Agroforestry Center in Vietnam, Hanoi
18. Kosoy N., Corbera E., and Brown K. Participation in payments for ecosystem services: case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico. Geoforum 39 (2008) 2073-2083 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.007
19. Landell-Mills N., and Porras I.T. Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services And Their Impact on the Poor (2002), IIED, London
20. Lee E., and Sango M. Payments for Environmental Services and Poverty Reduction. Risks and Opportunities. Issues Paper (2009), The Centre for People and Forests (RECOFTC), Bangkok
21. Leeuwis C. Making explicit the social dimensions of cognition. In: Leeuwis C., and Pyburn R. (Eds). Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs. Social Learning in Rural Resource Management (2002), Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Netherlands 391-406
22. Leimona B., and Lee E. Pro-Poor Payment for Environmental Services Some Considerations (2008), RUPES - ICRAF SEA, Bogor
23. Locatelli B., Rojas V., and Salinas Z. Impacts of payments for environmental services on local development in northern Costa Rica: a fuzzy multi-criteria analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 10 5 (2008) 275-285
24. MacKinnon K., and Wardojo W. ICDPs: imperfect solutions for imperilled forests in Southeast Asia. Parks 11 2 (2001) (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland)
25. May P., Boyd E., Chang M., and Veiga F. Local Sustainable Development Effects of Forest Carbon Projects in Brazil and Bolivia: A View from the Field. No. 5 (2004), IIED, London
26. Mayrand K., and Paquin M. Payments for Environmental Services: A Survey and Assessment of Current Schemes. Report for the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America (2004), Unisfera International Centre, Montreal
27. Miranda M., Porras I.T., and Moreno M.L. The Social Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica. A Quantitative Field Survey and Analysis of the Virilla Watershed. No. 1 (2003), International Institute for Environment and Development, London
28. Nguyen Thuy Ngoc, 2007. Role of social capital in natural resource conservation: A case study of Cat Tien National Park in Vietnam. Ph.D. thesis. University of Florida, 158 pp.
29. Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 65 4 (2007) 712-724 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033
30. Pagiola S., Arcenas A., and Platais G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America. World Development 33 2 (2005) 237-253
31. Pagiola S., Rios A.R., and Arcenas A. Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the silvopastoral project in Nicaragua. Environment and Development Economics 13 (2008) 299-325
32. Pham Thu Thuy M., Hoang M.H., and Campbell B.M. Pro-poor payments for environmental services: challenges for the Government and administrative agencies in Vietnam. Public Administration and Development 28 5 (2008) 363-373
33. Polet G., and Ling S. Protecting mammal diversity: opportunities and constraints for pragmatic conservation management in Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam. Oryx 38 2 (2004) 186-196
34. Sage N., and Nguyen C. A Discussion Paper on Analysis of Constraints and Enabling Factors of ICDPs in Vietnam (2001), ICDP Working Group, Hanoi
35. Simpson R., and Sedjo R.A. Paying for the conservation of endangered ecosystems: a comparison of direct and indirect approaches. Environment and Development Economics 1 (1996) 241-257
36. Sunderlin W.D., and Hunyh Thu Ba. Poverty Alleviation and Forests in Vietnam (2005), CIFOR, Bogor
37. Swallow B.M., Kallesoe M.F., Iftikhar U.A., van Noordwijk M., Bracer C., Scherr S.J., Raju K.V., Poats S.V., Kumar Duraiappah A., Ochieng B.O., Mallee H., and Rumley R. Compensation and rewards for environmental services in the developing world: framing pan-tropical analysis and comparison. Ecology and Society 14 2 (2009) 26
38. Swinkels, R., Turk, C., 2004. Poverty and remote areas: evidence from new data and questions for the future. In: Background Paper for the PAC Conference. November 24-26, 2004. Hanoi, Vietnam.
39. Tacconi, L., Mahanty, S., Suich, H., 2009. Assessing the livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services: implications for avoided deforestation. Crawford School of Economics and Government. Research Summary, August 2009.
40. Vo Quy. Environmental overview of Vietnam uplands in the last ten years: current status and arising issues. In: Le Trong Cuc, and Chu Huu Quy (Eds). Sustainable Development in Vietnam Upland Areas: A Look at the Last 10 Years and Arising Issues (2002), Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi
41. Whitehead J., and McNiff J. Action Research Living Theory (2006), Sage, London
42. Wunder S. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No 42 (2005), CIFOR, Bogor
43. Wunder S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21 1 (2007) 48-58
44. Wunder S., Bui Dung The, and Ibarra E. Payment Is Good, Control Is Better: Why Payments for Environmental Services So Far Have Remained Incipient in Vietnam (2005), CIFOR, Bogor 86
45. WWF. Payments for Environmental Services - An Equitable Approach for Reducing Poverty and Conserving Nature. WWF Report June, Switzerland. Available at: (2006). http://assets.panda.org/downloads/pes_report_2006.pdf (accessed Nov 2008)
46. Zbinden S., and Lee D. Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation Costa Rica's PSA program. World Development 33 2 (2005) 255-272
47. Zilberman D.V. Payments for environmental services: who gains who loses?. Agricultural and Resource Economics Update 11 1 (2007) 1-3