Influence of apple pomace inclusion on the process of animal feed pelleting

Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1353-1363

  Maslovarić, Marijana D ^a,b   Vukmirović, Đuro ^c   Pezo, Lato ^d   Čolović, Radmilo ^c   Jovanović, Rade ^a   Spasevski, Nedeljka ^d   Tolimir, Nataša ^a  

^a Institute for Science Application in Agriculture   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

alternative feedstuff; Apple pomace; pellet quality; pelleting; production parameters

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FRUIT JUICES; FRUITS; MIXTURES; PRESSES (MACHINE TOOLS); PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ALTERNATIVE FEEDSTUFF; APPLE POMACE; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT; PELLET QUALITY; PRODUCTION PARAMETERS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

PELLETIZING;

ANIMAL FOOD; APPLE JUICE; APPLE POMACE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; FOOD QUALITY; HARDNESS; MAIZE; MOISTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; SUNFLOWER MEAL; THICKNESS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; MALUS;

FOOD ADDITIVE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; FOOD ADDITIVES; MALUS;

EID: 85028680101     PISSN: 19440049     EISSN: 19440057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2017.1303851     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aarseth KA., 2004. Attrition of feed pellets during pneumatic conveying:the influence of velocity and bend radius. Biosyst Eng. 89:197–213.
2. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V, Svihus B. 2013. Pelleting of broiler diets:an overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 179:1–23.
3. Abdollahzadeh F, Pirmohammadi R, Fatehi F, Bernousi I. 2010. Effect of feeding ensiled mixed tomato and apple pomace on performance of Holstein dairy cows. Slovak J Anim Sci. 43:31–35.
4. AOAC. 1998. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersburg (MD).
5. AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersburg (MD).
6. AOAC. 2002. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersburg (MD).
7. AOCS. 2001. Crude fiber analysis in feeds - filter bag technique (for A200 and A200I). AOCS approved procedure Ba 6a-05. ANKOM Technology Method 7. [cited 2016 Oct 18]. Available from:https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/document-files/Method_7_Crude_Fiber_A200.pdf.
8. Ayhan V, Duru AA, Özkaya S. 2009. Possibilities of using dried apple pomace in broiler chicken diets. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 15:669–672.
9. Behnke KC. 2001. Factors influencing pellet quality. Feed Mix (Feed Tech). 5:19–22.
10. Bhushan S, Gupta M. 2013. Apple pomace–source of dietary fibre and antioxidant for food fortification. In:Preedy VR, editor. The handbook of food fortification and health-from concepts to public health applications Volume 2. New York (NY):Springer Science + Business Media; p. 21–27.
11. Brlek T, Pezo L, Voća N, Krička T, Vukmirović Đ, Čolović R, Solarov MB. 2013. Chemometric approach for assessing the quality of olive cake pellets. Fuel Process Technol. 116:250–256.
12. Buchanan NP., 2008. Diet formulation and manufacturing technique interactions affect pellet quality and broiler growth. [dissertation]. Morgantown (WV):West Virginia University.
13. Buchanan NP, Moritz JS. 2009. Main effects and interactions of varying formulation protein, fiber, and moisture on feed manufacture and pellet quality. J Appl Poult Res. 18:274–283.
14. Čolović R, Đ V, Matulaitis R, Bliznikas S, Uchockis V, Juškien V, Lević J. 2010. Effect of die channel press way length on physical quality of pelleted cattle feed. Food & Feed Res. 37:1–6.
15. Čolović R, Pezo L, Đ V, Čolović D, Bera O, Banjac V, Lević J. 2015. Effects of sunflower meal quality on the technical parameters of the pelleting process and pellet quality. Biosyst Eng. 140:98–105.
16. Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the catalogue of feed materials. 2013. Catalogue of feed materials. Off J Eur Union. 56:L29-L29/64.
17. Crawshaw R. 2009. Food industry co-products as animal feeds. In:Waldron KW, editor. Handbook of waste management and co-product recovery in food processing. Cambridge (UK):Woodhead; p. 391–412.
18. Cvetković B, Pezo L, Tasić T, Šarić L, Ž K, Mastilović J. 2015. The optimisation of traditional fermentation process of white cabbage (in relation to biogenic amines and polyamines content and microbiological profile). Food Chem. 168:471–477.
19. Dhillon GS, Kaur S, Brar SK. 2013. Perspective of apple processing wastes as low-cost substrates for bioproduction of high value products:a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 27:789–805.
20. Đilas S, Čanadanovic-Brunet J, Ćetković G. 2009. By-products of fruit processing as a source of phytochemicals. Chem Ind Chem Eng. 15:191–202.
21. Fairchild F, Greer D. 1999. Cold mash moisture control boosts pellet quality. Feed Manag. 50:20–23.
22. Gutzwiller A, Czeglédi L, Stoll P, Bruckner L. 2007. Effects of Fusarium toxins on growth, humoral immune response and internal organs in weaner pigs and the efficacy of apple pomace as an antidote. J Anim Physiology Anim Nutr. 91:432–438.
23. Kuehl RO. 2000. Design of experiments:statistical principles of research design and analysis-second edition. Pacific Grove (CA):Duxbury/Thomson Learning.
24. Loar RE, II, Corzo A. 2011. Effects of feed formulation on feed manufacturing and pellet quality characteristics of poultry diets. Worlds Poult Sci J. 67:19–27.
25. Macgregor CA. 2000. Directory of feeds & feed ingredients. Third ed. Fort Atkinson WI:Hoard’s Dairyman.
26. Madamba PS. 2002. The response surface methodology:an application to optimize dehydration operations of selected agricultural crops. LWT–Food Sci Technol. 35:584–592.
27. Maslovarić M, Vukmirović Đ, Čolović R, Jovanović R, Spasevski N, Tolimir N. 2015. Pelleting properties and pellet quality of apple pomace. Food & Feed Res. 42:147–154.
28. Matoo FA, Beat GA, Banday MT, Ganaie TAS. 2001. Performance of broilers fed on apple pomace diets supplemented with enzyme (S). Indian J Anim Sci. 18:349–352.
29. Miladinović B, Svihus B. 2005. Optimising press settings contributes to better pellet quality. Feed Mix (Feed Tech). 9:15–17.
30. Moritz JS, Cramer KR, Wilson KJ, Beyer RS. 2003. Feed manufacture and feeding of rations with graded levels of added moisture formulated to different energy densities. J Appl Poult Res. 12:371–381.
31. Parmar I, Rupasinghe HPV. 2013. Bio-conversion of apple pomace into ethanol and acetic acid:enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 130:613–620.
32. Pieszka M, Szczurek P, Bederska-Łojewska D, Władysław M, Pieszka M, Gogol P, Jagusiak W. 2017. The effect of dietary supplementation with dried fruit and vegetable pomaces on production parameters and meat quality in fattening pigs. Meat Sci. 126:1–10.
33. Pirmohammadi R, Rouzbehan Y, Rezayazdi K, Zahedifar M. 2006. Chemical composition, digestibility and in situ degradability of dried and ensiled apple pomace and maize silage. Small Rumin Res. 66:150–155.
34. Rulebook on methods for physical and chemical analyses used in quality control of cereals, milling products, pasta and deep freeze dough. The Official Gazette of SFRY, No. 74/88. Belgrade, Public enterprise 'Official Gazette' Pravilnik o metodama fizičkih i hemijskih analiza za kontrolu kvaliteta žita, mlinskih i pekarskih proizvoda, testenina i brzo smrznutih testa ‘Službeni list SFRJ’ br. 74/88, Beograd, Javno preduzeće “Službeni glasnik” (in Serbian).
35. Taasoli G, Kafilzadeh F. 2008. Effects of dried and ensiled apple pomace from puree making on performance of finishing lambs. Pak J Biological Sci. 11:294–297.
36. Thomas M, van der Poel AFB. 1996. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed:1. Criteria for pellet quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 61:89–112.
37. Thomas M, Van Vliet T, van der Poel AFB. 1998. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed 3. Contribution of feedstuff components. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 70:59–78.
38. Tiwari SP, Narang MP, Dubey M. 2008. Effect of feeding apple pomace on milk yield and milk composition in crossbred (Red Sindhi x Jersey) cow. Livest Res Rural Dev. 20. Article 62. [cited 2017 Feb 27]. Available from:http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/4/tiwa20062.html
39. Vendruscolo F, Albuquerque PM, Streit F, Esposito E, Ninow JL. 2008. Apple pomace:a versatile substrate for biotechnological applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 28:1–12.
40. Wang Z, Sun J, Liao X, Chen F, Zhao G, Wu J, Hu X. 2007. Mathematical modeling on hot air drying of thin layer apple pomace. Food Res Int. 40:39–46.
41. Zimonja O, Hetland H, Lazarević N, Edvardsen DH, Svihus B. 2008. Effects of fibre content in pelleted wheat and oat diets on technical pellet quality and nutritional value for broiler chickens. Can J Anim Sci. 88:613–622.