Human taste detection of glucose oligomers with low degree of polymerization

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Pullicin, Alexa J ^a   Penner, Michael H ^a   Lim, Juyun ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACARBOSE; CARBOHYDRATE; MALTOOLIGOSACCHARIDE; MALTOSE; OLIGOMER; OLIGOSACCHARIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BENZENE DERIVATIVE; GLUCOSE; LACTISOLE; MALTOOLIGOSACCHARIDES; SWEETENING AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; POLYMERIZATION; SWEETNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASTE ACUITY; TASTE BUD; TASTE DISCRIMINATION; VOLUNTEER; YOUNG ADULT; DRUG EFFECTS; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE;

ADULT; BENZENE DERIVATIVES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; GLUCOSE; HUMANS; MALE; MALTOSE; MIDDLE AGED; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; TASTE BUDS; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85028569454     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lapis TJ, Penner MH, Lim J. Evidence that humans can taste glucose polymers. Chem Senses. 2014 Nov 1; 39(9):737–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bju031 PMID: 25326592
2. Lapis TJ, Penner MH, Lim J. Humans can taste glucose oligomers independent of the hT1R2/hT1R3 sweet taste receptor. Chem Senses. 2016 Nov; 41(9):755–62.
3. Laska M, Kohlmann S, Scheuber H-P, Salazar LTH, Luna ER. Gustatory responsiveness to Polycose in four species of nonhuman primates. J Chem Ecol. 2001; 27(10):1997–2011. PMID: 11710607
4. Sclafani A. The sixth taste? Appetite. 2004 Aug; 43(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.03.007 PMID: 15262010
5. Treesukosol Y, Blonde GD, Spector AC. T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice. AJP Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 Feb 4; 296(4):R855–65.
6. Treesukosol Y, Smith KR, Spector AC. Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer in a mouse model. J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21; 31(38):13527–34. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2179-11.2011 PMID: 21940444
7. Zukerman S, Glendinning JI, Margolskee RF, Sclafani A. T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste. Am J Physiol—Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 Apr 1; 296(4):R866–76. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.90870.2008 PMID: 19091911
8. Sclafani A, Hertwig H, Vigorito M, Sloan H, Kerzner B. Influence of saccharide length on polysaccharide appetite in the rat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987; 11(2):197–200. PMID: 3614786
9. Sclafani A, Nissenbaum JW, Vigorito M. Starch preference in rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987; 11 (2):253–62. PMID: 3614793
10. Nissenbaum JW, Sclafani A. Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: A two-carbohydrate taste model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987; 11(2):187–96. PMID: 3614785
11. Spector AC, Schier LA. Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms. Appetite. 2016;
12. Balto AS, Lapis TJ, Silver RK, Ferreira AJ, Beaudry CM, Lim J, et al. On the use of differential solubility in aqueous ethanol solutions to narrow the DP range of food-grade starch hydrolysis products. Food Chem. 2016 Apr 15; 197(Pt A):872–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.120 PMID: 26617029
13. Robyt JF, Mukerjea R. Separation and quantitative determination of nanogram quantities of maltodextrins and isomaltodextrins by thin-layer chromatography. Carbohydr Res. 1994; 251:187–202.
14. Nilsson GS, Gorton L, Bergquist K-E, Nilsson U. Determination of the degree of branching in normal and amylopectin type potato starch with 1H-NMR spectroscopy improved resolution and two-dimensional spectroscopy. Starch-Stärke. 1996; 48(10):352–7.
15. Brooks JR, Griffin VK. Saccharide analysis of corn syrup solids and maltodextrins using high-performance liquid chromatography. Cereal Chem. 1987; 64(4):253–5.
16. Jiang P, Cui M, Zhao B, Liu Z, Snyder LA, Benard LMJ, et al. Lactisole Interacts with the Transmem-brane Domains of Human T1R3 to Inhibit Sweet Taste. J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 15; 280(15):15238–46. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414287200 PMID: 15668251
17. Galindo-Cuspinera V, Winnig M, Bufe B, Meyerhof W, Breslin PAS. A TAS1R receptor-based explanation of sweet ‘water-taste’. Nature. 2006 May 18; 441(7091):354–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04765 PMID: 16633339
18. Green B, Nachtigal D. The effects of temperature on sequential and mixture interactions between sucrose and saccharin. Chem Senses. 38(7):655.
19. Pangborn RM, Gee SC. Relative Sweetness of α- and β-Forms of Selected Sugars. Nature. 1961 Aug 19; 191(4790):810–1.
20. Ennis DM. The power of sensory discrimination methods. J Sens Stud. 1993 Dec; 8(4):353–70.
21. Lawless HT, Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010
22. Mishra PJ, Ragunath C, Ramasubbu N. The mechanism of salivary amylase hydrolysis: Role of residues at subsite S20. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Mar; 292(2):468–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2002.6682 PMID: 11906186
23. van der Maarel MJE., van der Veen B, Uitdehaag JC., Leemhuis H, Dijkhuizen L. Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the α-amylase family. J Biotechnol. 2002 Mar; 94(2):137–55. PMID: 11796168
24. Vigorito M, Sclafani A. Effects of gustatory deafferentation on polycose and sucrose appetite in the rat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1987; 11(2):201–9. PMID: 3614787
25. Whelan WJ, Roberts PJP. Action of salivary α-amylase on amylopectin and glycogen. Nature. 1952 Nov 1; 170(4331):748–9. PMID: 13002429
26. Sukumaran SK, Yee KK, Iwata S, Kotha R, Quezada-Calvillo R, Nichols BL, et al. Taste cell-expressed α-glucosidase enzymes contribute to gustatory responses to disaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016 May 24; 113(21):6035–40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520843113 PMID: 27162343
27. Yee KK, Sukumaran SK, Kotha R, Gilbertson TA, Margolskee RF. Glucose transporters and ATP-gated K+ (KATP) metabolic sensors are present in type 1 taste receptor 3 (T1r3)-expressing taste cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011; 108(13):5431–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100495108 PMID: 21383163
28. Glendinning JI, Stano S, Holter M, Azenkot T, Goldman O, Margolskee RF, et al. Sugar-induced cephalic-phase insulin release is mediated by a T1r2+T1r3-independent taste transduction pathway in mice. Am J Physiol—Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015 Sep; 309(5):R552–60. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00056.2015 PMID: 26157055
29. Glendinning JI, Frim YG, Hochman A, Lubitz GS, Basile AJ, Sclafani A. Glucose elicits cephalic-phase insulin release in mice by activating K (ATP) channels in taste cells. Am J Physiol-Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017;ajpregu–00433.
30. Robyt JF, French D. The Action Pattern of Porcine Pancreatic α-Amylase in Relationship to the Substrate Binding Site of the Enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1970 Aug 10; 245(15):3917–27. PMID: 5531189
31. Lapis TJ, Penner MH, Balto AS, Lim J. Oral digestion and perception of starch: Effects of cooking, tasting time, and salivary α-amylase activity. Chem Senses. Online available.