On the use of extended TAM to assess students' acceptance and intent to use third-generation learning management systems

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1250-1271

  Ros, Salvador ^a   Hernández, Roberto ^a   Caminero, Agustín ^a   Robles, Antonio ^a   Barbero, Isabel ^b   Maciá, Araceli ^b   Holgado, Francisco Pablo ^b  

^a National University for Distance Education of Spain   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ACCEPTANCE MODELS; E-LEARNING PLATFORMS; EXTENDED TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODELS; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; LEARNING SCENARIOS; PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85028202796     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12199     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., and, Todd, P. A., (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 2, 227-248.
2. Ajzen, I., and, Fishbein, M., (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Al-Adwan, A., Al-Adwan, A., and, Smedley, J., (2013). Exploring students acceptance of e-learning using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 9, 2, 4-18.
4. Bourne, J., and, Harris, D., (2005). Online engineering education: learning anywhere anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, 131-146.
5. Campbell, J., Bourne, J., Mosterman, P., and, Brodersen, A., (2002). The effectiveness of learning simulations for electronics laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 1, 81-87.
6. Chang, S.-C., and, Tung, F.-C., (2008). An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 1, 71-83.
7. Dagger, D., O'Connor, A., Lawless, S., Walsh, E., and, Wade, V., (2007). Service-Oriented E-learning Platforms from Monolithic Systems to flexible services. IEEE Internet Computing, 11, 3, 28-35.
8. Davis, F. D., (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 319-340.
9. Davis, F. D., (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 3, 475-487.
10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R., and, Warshaw, P., (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 8, 982-1003.
11. Ebner, M., and, Taraghi, B., (2010). Personal learning environment for higher education-a first prototype. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia Telecommunications. Chesapeake.
12. Eid, M., and, Diener, E., (2006). Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Routledge, NY: American Psychological Association (APA.
13. Fishbein, M., and, Ajzen, I., (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Fontana, F., Moreno, A., Cosimi, E., and, D'Arcangelo, D., (2008). A web 2.0 dynamic virtual environment to manage e-learning objects and videos for synchronous and asynchronous lectures and seminars. In Proc. of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 1900-1906).
15. Giannakos, M. N., and, Vlamos, P., (2013). Educational webcasts' acceptance: empirical examination and the role of experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 1, 125-143.
16. Gillet, D., Law, E., and, Chatterjee, A., (2010). Personal learning environments in a global higher engineering education Web 2.0 realm. Madrid: IEEE EDUCON.
17. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., and, Black, W., (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
18. Hartley, K., and, Bendixen, L., (2001). Educational research in the internet age: examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30, 9, 22-26.
19. Hu, P., Chau, P., Sheng, O., and, Tam, K., (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 2, 91-112.
20. International Test Commission. (2005). En International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet Delivered Testing. ITC.
21. Kline, P., (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
22. Landry, B., Griffeth, R., and, Hartman, S., (2006). Measuring student perceptions of Blackboard using the technology acceptance mode. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4, 1, 87-99.
23. Liaw, S., (2007). Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, 51, 864-873.
24. Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., and, Kuo, C., (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers and Education, 54, 600-610.
25. Mahinda, E., and, Whitworth, B., (2005). The web of system performance: extending the TAM model. Proc. of the 11th America's Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Omaha, USA.
26. Martins, L., and, Kellermanns, F., (2004). A model of business school students' acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 7-26.
27. McGiven, J., (1994). Designing the learning environment to meet the needs of distant students. Journal of Technology and Learning, 27, 52-57.
28. McKnight, C., Dillon, A., and, Richardson, J., (1996). User-centered design of hypertext/hypermedia for education. In, R. B. Kozma, (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 622-633). Washington: Association for Educational Communication.
29. Meskill, C., (1996). Listening skills development through multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 2, 179-201.
30. Muñoz-Organero, M., Muñoz-Merino, P., and, Kloos, C., (2010). Personalized service-oriented E-learning environments. IEEE Internet Computing, 14, 2, 62-67.
31. Najjar, L., (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129-150.
32. Ngai, E., Poon, J., and, Chan, Y., (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers and Education, 48, 250-267.
33. Nunnally, J., and, Bernstein, I., (1995). Teoría psicométrica. México: McGraw-Hill.
34. O'Reilly, T., (2010). What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, November. Retrieved August 2, 2014, from http://oreilly.com/lpt/a/6228
35. Ong, C., Lai, J., and, Wang, Y., (2004). Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning system in high-tech companies. Information and Management, 41, 795-804.
36. Pan, C., Gunter, G., Sivo, S., and, Cornell, R., (2005). End-user acceptance of a learning management system in two hybrid large-sized introductory undergraduate courses: a case study. Journal of Educational Technology System, 33, 4, 355-365.
37. Persico, D., Manca, S., and, Pozzi, F., (2014). Adapting the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 614-622.
38. Pituch, K., and, Lee, Y., (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers and Education, 47, 222-244.
39. Raaij, E., and, Schepers, J., (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers and Education, 50, 838-852.
40. Reed, W., Oughton, J., Ayersman, D., Ervin, J., and, Giessler, S., (2000). Computer experience, learning style, and hypermedia navigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 619-628.
41. Ros, S., Hernández, R., Robles-Gomez, A., Caminero, A., Tobarra, L., and, Sancristobal, E., (2013). Implementing Personal Learning Environments base on open service-oriented learning platforms. IEEE Internet Computing, 17, 4, 26-31.
42. Rovai, A., (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 2, 79-93.
43. Selim, H., (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers and Education, 40, 343-360.
44. Taraghi, B., Ebner, M., and, Schaffert, S., (2009). Personal learning environments for higher education: a mashup based widget concept. 4th European Conference on Technology-enhanced Learning: Synergy of Disciplines.
45. Vassileva, J., (2008). Towards social learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1, 4, 199-213.
46. Venkatesh, V., (2001). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 4, 342-365.
47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., and, Davis, F., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 425-478.
48. Yi, M., and, Hwang, Y., (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431-449.