Erratum: Wand and Weber's decomposition model in the context of business process modeling (Business and Information Systems Engineering (2012) 4:5 (271-286) DOI: 10.1007/s12599-012-0229-1);Wand and Weber's decomposition model in the context of business process modeling

Business and Information Systems Engineering

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 271-286

  Johannsen, Florian ^a   Leist, Susanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decomposition; Event driven process chain; Process model

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028117631     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18670202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12599-012-0238-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (60)

1. Balzert H (2009) Lehrbuch der Softwaretechnik, 3rd edn. Spektrum, Heidelberg
2. Becker J (1995) Strukturanalogien in Informationsmodellen: Ihre Definition, ihr Nutzen und ihr Einfluß auf die Bildung von Grundsätzen ordnungsmäßiger Modellierung (GoM). In: König W (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 95:Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Innovation, Wirtschaftlichkeit. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 133-150
3. Becker J, Thome I, Weiß B, Winkelmann A (2010) Constructing a semantic business process modeling language for the banking sector. EnterpriseModelling and Information Systems Architectures 5(1):4-25
4. Bobrik R, Reichert M, Bauer T (2007) View-based process visualization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4714:88-95
5. Burton-Jones A, Meso P (2002) How good are these UML diagrams? An empirical test of the Wand and Weber good decomposition model. In: Proc 23rd international conference on information systems (ICIS), pp 101-114
6. Burton-Jones A, Meso P (2006) Conceptualizing systems for understanding: an empirical test of decomposition principles in object-oriented analysis. Information Systems Research 17(1):38-60 (Pubitemid 43450178)
7. Burton-Jones A,Meso PN (2008) The effects of decomposition quality and multiple forms of information on novices' understanding of a domain from a conceptual model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(12):748-802
8. Davis R (2001) Business process modeling with ARIS. Springer, London
9. Davis R, Brabänder E (2007) ARIS design platform: getting started with BPM. Springer, London
10. Decker G, Mendling J (2009) Process instantiation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(9):777-792
11. Dromey G (1996) Cornering the chimera. IEEE Software 13(1):33-43
12. Fettke P, Loos P (2007) Ontological evaluation of Scheer's reference model for production planning and control systems. Journal of Interoperability in Business Information Systems 2(1):9-28
13. Green P, Rosemann M (2000) Integrated process modeling: an ontological evaluation. Information Systems 25(2):73-87
14. Green P, RosemannM(2001) Ontological analysis of integrated process models: testing hypotheses. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 9(1):30-38 (Pubitemid 33340618)
15. Gruhn V, Laue R (2007) Approaches for business process model complexity metrics. In: Abramowicz W, Mayr HC (eds) Technologies for business information systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 13-24
16. Heinrich B, Henneberger M, Leist S, Zellner G (2009) The process map as an instrument to standardize processes: design and application at a financial service provider. Information Systems and E-Business Management 7(1):81-102
17. Hoffmann W, Wein R, Schweer A-W (1993) Konzeption eines Steuerungsmodells für Informationssysteme - Basis für die Real-Time-Erweiterung der EPK (rEPK). IWI-Heft 106, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Saarbrücken
18. Keller G, Nüttgens M, Scheer A-W (1992) Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). IWI-Heft 89, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Saarbrücken
19. Kindler E (2006) On the semantics of EPCs. Data & Knowledge Engineering 56(1):23-40
20. Krogstie J, Lindland OI, Sindre G (1995) Towards a deeper understanding of quality in requirements engineering. In: Proc 7th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CaiSE '95), pp 82-95
21. La RosaM,Wohed P, Mendling J, ter Hofstede AHM, Reijers HA, van der Aalst WMP (2011) Managing process model complexity via abstract syntax modifications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7(4):614-629
22. Malone TW, Crowston K, Lee J, Pentland B, Dellarocas C, Wyner G, Quimby J, Osborn CS, Bernstein A, Herman G, Klein M, Donnell EO (1999) Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science 45(3):425-443
23. Mendling J (2008) Metrics for process models - empirical foundations of verification, error prediction, and guidelines for correctness. Springer, Heidelberg
24. Mendling J, Reijers H, van der Aalst W (2010) Seven process modeling guidelines. Information and Software Technology 52(2):127-136
25. Mendling J, Reijers HA, Cardoso J (2007) What makes process models understandable? Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4714:48-63
26. Mesarovic MD, Macko D, Takahara Y (1970) Theory of hierarchical, multilevel, systems. Academic Press, New York
27. Moody DL, Flitman AR (2000) A decomposition method for entity relationship models: a systems theoretic approach. In: Proc 1st international conference on systems thinking in management, pp 462-469
28. Österle H (1995) Business Engineering - Prozesse- und Systementwicklung - Band 1: Entwurfstechniken, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg
29. Paulson D, Wand Y (1992) An automated approach to information systems decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18(3):174-189
30. Polyvyanyy A, Smirnov S,WeskeM(2008) Process model abstraction: a slider approach. In: EDOC 2008, pp 325-331
31. Recker J, Indulska M (2007) An ontology-based evaluation of process modeling with Petri nets. Journal of Interoperability in Business Information Systems 2(1):45-64
32. Recker J, Indulska M, Rosemann M, Green P (2005) Do process modeling techniques get better? A comparative ontological analysis of BPMN. In: Proc 16th Australasian conference on information systems, Sydney
33. Recker J, Rosemann M, Krogstie J (2007) Ontology- versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling languages: a comparison. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 20(48):774-799
34. Recker J, Rosemann M, Indulska M, Green P (2009) Business process modeling: a comparative analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10(4):333-363
35. Reijers HA (2003) A cohesion metric for the definition of activities in a workflow process. In: Eighth CAiSE/IFIP8.1 internationalworkshop on evaluation ofmodeling methods in systems analysis and design, pp 116-125
36. Reijers HA, Mendling J (2008) Modularity in processmodels: review and effects. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5240:20-35
37. Reijers HA, Vanderfeesten ITP (2004) Cohesion and coupling metrics for workflow process design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3080:290-305 (Pubitemid 39742130)
38. Reijers HA, Mendling J, Dijkman RM (2011) Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension. Information Systems 36(5):881-897
39. Rosemann M, Green P (2000) Integrating multi-perspective views into ontological analysis. In: Proc 21st international conference on information systems, Brisbane, Australia, pp 618-627
40. Rosemann M, Green P (2002) Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs. Information Systems 27(2):75-91 (Pubitemid 34138823)
41. Rosemann M, Green P, Indulska M (2004) A reference methodology for conducting ontological analyzes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3288:110-121 (Pubitemid 39745284)
42. Rosemann M, Green P, Indulska M, Recker JC (2009) Using ontology for the representational analysis of process modeling techniques. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management Decision 4(4):251-265
43. Scheer AW (2001) ARIS - Modellierungsmethoden - Metamodelle - Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin
44. Scheer AW, Thomas O, Adam O (2005) Process modeling using event-driven process chains. In: Dumas M, van der Aalst W, Hofstede AT (eds) Process-aware information systems. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 119-146
45. Schütte R, Rotthowe T (1998) The guidelines of modeling - an approach to enhance the quality in information models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1507:240-254 (Pubitemid 128155241)
46. Smirnov S, Dijkman R, Mendling J, Weske M (2010a) Meronymy-based aggregation of activities in business process models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6412:1-14
47. Smirnov S, Weidlich M, Mendling J (2010b) Business process model abstraction based on behavioral profiles. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6470:1-16
48. Smirnov S, Reijers HA, Weske M (2011) A semantic approach for business process model abstraction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6741:497-511
49. van der Aalst WMP, Desel J, Kindler E (2002) On the semantics of EPCs: a vicious circle. In: EPK 2002 - business process management using EPCs, Trier, pp 71-80
50. Vanderfeesten I, Cardoso J, Reijers HA (2007a) A weighted coupling metric for business process models. In: Proc of the CAiSE 2007, pp 41-44
51. Vanderfeesten I, Reijers HA, Mendling J, van der Aalst WMP, Cardoso J (2008a) On a quest for good process models: the crossconnectivity metric. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5074:480-494
52. Vanderfeesten I, Reijers HA, van der Aalst WMP (2008b) Evaluating workflow process designs using cohesion and coupling metrics. Computers in Industry 59(5):420-437
53. Vanderfeesten ITP, Cardoso J, Mendling J, Reijers HA, van der Aalst WMP (2007b) Quality metrics for business process models. In: Fischer L (ed) BPM and workflow handbook 2007: future strategies, pp 179-190
54. Vanhatalo J, Völzer H, Koehler J (2008) The refined process structure tree. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5240:100-115
55. Vanhatalo J, Völzer H, Leymann F (2007) Faster andmore focused control-flow analysis for business process models through SESE decomposition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4749:43-55
56. vom Brocke J (2006) Design principles for reference modeling - reusing information models by means of aggregation, specialisation, instantiation, and analogy. In: Fettke P, Loos P (eds) Referencemodeling for business systems analysis. Idea Group, Hershey, pp 47-76
57. Wand Y, Weber R (1989) A model of systems decomposition. In: Proc 10th international conference on information systems, Boston, pp 42-51
58. Wand Y, Weber R (1990) Toward a theory of the deep structure of information systems. In: Proc international conference on information systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 61-71
59. Weber R (1997) Ontological foundations of information systems. Coopers & Lybrand, Queensland
60. Yourdon E (1989) Modern structured analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs