INTEGRATING MULTI-PERSPECTIVE VIEWS INTO ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 618-627

  Rosemann, Michael ^a   Green, Peter ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; ONTOLOGY;

BUSINESS-USERS; BWW MODEL; META MODEL; METAMODELING; MULTI-PERSPECTIVE VIEWS; ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT; REPRESENTATION MODEL; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS; THEORY AND PRACTICE;

COST EFFECTIVENESS;

EID: 85080646492     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bansler, J. P., and Bodker, K. “A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (11:2), 1993, pp. 165-193.
2. Bateman, J. A. “On the Relationship Between Ontology Construction and Natural Language: A Socio-semiotic View,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (43:5/6), 1995, pp. 929-944.
3. Batra, D., Hoffer, J. A., and Bostrom, R. P. “Comparing Representations with Relational and EER Models,” Communications of the ACM (33:2), 1990, pp. 126-139.
4. Bunge, M. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Volume 3: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, Boston: Reidel, 1977.
5. Chen, P. P. S. “The Entity-Relationship Model—Toward a Unified View of Data,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems (1:1), 1976, pp. 9-36.
6. Colter, M. A. “A Comparative Examination of Systems Analysis Techniques,” MIS Quarterly, March 1984, pp. 51-66.
7. Floyd, C. “A Comparative Evaluation of System Development Methods,” in Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice, T. William Olle, H. G. Sol, A. A. Verrijn-Stuart (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986, pp. 19-37.
8. Gorla, N, Pu, H-C., and Rom, W. O. “Evaluation of Process Tools in Systems Analysis,” Information and Software Technology (37:2), 1995, pp. 119-126.
9. Green, P. F. “Use of Information Systems Analysis and Design (ISAD) Grammars in Combination in Upper CASE Tools—An Ontological Evaluation,” in Proceedings of the Second CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on the Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD’97), Barcelona, Spain, 1997, pp. 1-12.
10. Green, P. F., and Rosemann, M. “Integrated Process Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation,” Information Systems (25:2), 2000, pp. 73-87.
11. Guarino, N. “Formal Ontology in Information Systems,” in Proceedings of Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 98), Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1998.
12. Horngren, C. T., Foster, G., Datar, S. M., Black, T., and Grey, P. Cost Accounting in Australia: A Managerial Emphasis, Sydney: Prentice Hall, 1996.
13. Karam, G. M., and Casselman, R. S. “A Cataloging Framework for Software Development Methods,” IEEE Computer, February 1993, pp. 34-46.
14. Opdahl, A. L., and Henderson-Sellers, B. “Grounding the OML Metamodel in Ontology,” Working Paper, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1999, pp. 1-59.
15. Parsons, J., and Wand, Y. “Using Objects in Systems Analysis,” Communications of the ACM (40:12), 1997, pp. 104-110.
16. Rosemann, M., and Green, P. F. “Enhancing the Process of Ontological Analysis—The ‘Who Cares’ Dimension,” in Proceedings of the Information Systems Foundations Workshop-Ontology, Semiotics and Practice, C. N. C. Dampney (ed.), Macquarie University, Sydney: Lighthouse Press, 2000, pp. 39-54.
17. nd ed.), Berlin: Springer, Heidelberg, 1998.
18. Seligmann, P. S., Wijers, G. M., and Sol, H. G. “Analyzing the Structure of IS Methodologies: An Alternative Approach,” in Proceedings of First Dutch Conference on Information Systems, R. Maes (ed.), November 1989, pp. 1-28.
19. Sinha, A. P., and Vessey, I. “End-user Data Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation of Relational and Object-oriented Schema Diagrams,” Working Paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1995.
20. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “A Model of Control and Audit Procedure Change in Evolving Data Processing Systems,” The Accounting Review (LXIV:1), 1989a, pp. 87-107.
21. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “An Ontological Evaluation of Systems Analysis and Design Methods,” in Information System Concepts: An In-depth Analysis, E. D. Falkenberg and P. Lindgreen (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989b, pp. 79-107.
22. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “An Ontological Model of an Information System,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (16:11), 1990a, pp. 1281-1291.
23. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “Mario Bunge’s Ontology as a Formal Foundation for Information Systems Concepts,” in Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise, P. Weingartner and G. J. W. Dorn (eds.), Atlanta: Rodopi, 1990b, pp. 123-149.
24. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “A Unified Model of Software and Data Decomposition,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, J. I. DeGross, I. Benbasat, G. DeSanctis and C. M. Beath (eds.), New York, 1991, pp. 101-110.
25. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “On the Ontological Expressiveness of Information Systems Analysis and Design Grammars,” Journal of Information Systems (3:4), 1993, pp. 217-237.
26. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “On the Deep Structure of Information Systems,” Information Systems Journal (5:5), 1995, pp. 203-223.
27. Weber, R. Ontological Foundations of Information Systems, Coopers & Lybrand Accounting Research Methodology, Monograph No. 4, Melbourne, 1997.
28. Weber, R., and Zhang, Y. “An Analytical Evaluation of NIAM’s Grammar for Conceptual Schema Diagrams,” Information Systems Journal (6:2), 1996, pp. 147-170.