Design principles for reference modeling: Reusing information models by means of aggregation, specialisation, instantiation, and analogy

Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 47-76

  vom Brocke, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900586432     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-054-7.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language. New York.
2. Axenath, B., Kindler, E., & Rubin, V. (2005). An open and formalism independent metamodel for business processes. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Business Process Reference Models (BPRM'05), Nancy, France.
3. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Dreiling, A., Knackstedt, R., & Kuropka, D. (2004). Configurative process modeling: Outlining an approach to increased business process model usability. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2004 Information Resources Management Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
4. Becker, J., & Schütte, R. (2004). Retail information systems (in German) (2. vollst. überarb., erw. u. akt. Aufl. ed.). Frankfurt a. M.
5. Chen, P. P.-S. (1976). The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36.
6. Coad, P., North, D., & Mayfield, M. (1997). Object models: Strategies, patterns, and applications. NJ: Yourdon Press.
7. nd ed.). Saddle Brook, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (11), 386-405.
9. Conradi, R., & Westfechtel, B. (1998). Version models for software configuration management. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 30(2), 232-282.
10. Cox, B. (1990). Planning the software industrial revolution. IEEE Software, 7(8), 25-33.
11. D'Souza, D. (2000). Relating components and enterprise integration: Part 1. JOOP, 13(1), 40-42.
12. Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003). Classification of reference models: A methodology and its application. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1(1), 35-53.
13. Fowler, M. (1997). Analysis patterns: Reusable object models. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
14. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented design. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
15. George, W. T. C., & Heineman, T. (2001). Component-based software engineering: Putting the pieces together. New York.
16. Gomaa, H. (1995). Domain modeling methods and environments. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 20(SI), 256-258.
17. Hay, D. C. (1996). Data model patterns: Conventions of thought. New York: Dorset House Publishing.
18. Huschens, J., & Rumpold-Preining, M. (2006). IBM insurance application architecture (IAA): An overview of the insurance business architecture. In P. Bernus, K. Mertins, & G. Schmidt (Eds.), Handbook on architectures of information systems (2nd ed., pp. 669-692). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Jones, T. C. (1984). Reusability in programming, a survey of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10(5), 488-493.
20. Kang, K., C.,Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., & Huh, M. (1998). FORM: A feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures. Annals of Software Engineering, 5, 143-168.
21. Karagiannis, D., & Kühn, H. (2002). Metamodelling platforms. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third International Conference EC-Web, September 2-6, 2002, LNCS 2455, Dexa, Aix-en-Provence, France.
22. th International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston.
23. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., & Scheer, A.-W. (1992). Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik der Universität des Saarlandes, (89).
24. nd ed., pp. 723-743). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. rd ed.). Boston.
26. McIlroy, M. D. (1968). Mass produced software components. In P. Naur & B. Randell (Eds.), Software Engineering, Report on a Conference by the NATO Science Committee (pp. 138-150). Brussels: NATO Scientific Affaris Division.
27. nd ed., pp. 705-721). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28. Melton, R., & Garlan, D. (1997). Architectural unification. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1997 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
29. Mili, A., Fowler, S., Gottumukkala, R., & Zhang, L. (2000). An integrated cost model for software reuse. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM, ICSE 2000, Limerick, Ireland.
30. Mili, H., Mili, A., Yacoub, S., & Addy, E. (2002). Reuse-based software engineering. New York.
31. Mili, H., Mili, F., & Mili, A. (1995). Reusing software: Issues and research directions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(6), 528-562.
32. Peterson, A. S. (1991). Coming to terms with software reuse terminology: A model-based approach. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 16(2), 45-51.
33. Raumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-oriented modeling and design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
34. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Mendling, J. (2005). On the syntax of reference model configuration. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Business Process Reference Models (BPRM'05), Nancy, France.
35. rd European Conference on Information Systems-ECIS '95, Athens, Greece.
36. nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman.
37. Scheer, A.-W. (1994). Business process engineering: Reference models for industrial enterprises. New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Scheer, A.-W., & Nüttgens, M. (2000). ARIS architecture and reference models for business process management. In W. M. P. van der Aalst, J. Desel, & A. Oberweis (Eds.), Business process managemen: Models,techniques, and empirical studies (pp. 376-389). Berlin: Springer.
39. Slater, P. (1995). Output from generic packages. ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, XV(3), 76-79.
40. Spanoudakis, G., & Constantopoulos, P. (1993). Similarity for analogical software reuse: A conceptual modelling approach. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Advanced Information Systems Engineering.
41. Szyperski, C. (1998). Component software. Beyond object-oriented programming (Vol. 2). New York: ACM Press and Addison-Wesley.
42. Thomas, O. (2005). Understanding the term reference model in information system research. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Business Process Reference Models (BPRM'05), Nancy, France.
43. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., & Jansen-Vullers, M. H. (2005). Configurable process models as a basis for reference modeling. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Business Process Reference Models (BPRM'05), Nancy, France.
44. vom Brocke, J. (2003). Reference modelling, towards collaborative arrangements of design processes. Berlin: Springer. [in German]
45. vom Brocke, J., & Buddendick, C. (2004). Organisation theory in reference modelling: Requirements and recommendation on the basis of transaction cost economics. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 46(5), 341-352. [in German]
46. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Tree Press.