The guidelines of modeling - An approach to enhance the quality in information models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1507, Issue , 1998, Pages 240-254

  Schuette, Reinhard ^a   Rotthowe, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; INFORMATION THEORY;

DEGREE OF PRECISION; DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; INFORMATION MODELING; INFORMATION MODELS; MODELING PROCESS; QUALITY OF INFORMATION; SPECIFIC PROBLEMS; STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORKS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 84957808248     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49524-6_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Albert, H.: Traktat ueber rationale Praxis. Tuebingen 1978.
2. Albert, H.: Kritische Vernunft und menschliche Praxis. Stuttgart 1977.
3. Batini, C.; Ceri, S.; Navathe, S. B.: Conceptual Database Design. An Entity-Relationship-Approach. Redwood City et al. 1992
4. Batini, C.; Furlani, L.; Nardelli, E.: What is a good diagramm? A pragmatic approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach: The Use of ER Concepts in Knowledge Representation. Berlin et al. 1985, pp. 312-319.
5. Batini, C.; Nardelli, E.; Tamassia, R.: A Layout Algorithm for Data Flow Diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12 (1986) 4, pp. 538-546.
6. Batini, C.; Talamo, M.; Tamassia, R.: Computer Aided Layout of Entity Relationship Diagrams. The Journal of Systems and Software, 4 (1984), pp. 163-173.
7. Becker, J.: The Architecture of retail information systems. In: J. Becker, H. L. Grob, U. Müller-Funk, G. Vossen, (Ed.), Working papers of the Department of Information Systems. No. 46. Muenster 1996.
8. Becker, J.; Ehlers, L.; Schuette, R.: Grundsaetze ordnungsmaessiger Modellierung. Konzeption, Vorgehensmodell, informationstechnische Realisierung, Nutzen. In: Statusseminar des BMBF Softwaretechnologie. 23.-24. Maerz 1998. Projekttraeger Informationstechnik des BMBF bei der DLR e.V. im Auftrag des BMBF. U. Grote, G. Wolf (Eds.). Berlin 1998.
9. Bretzke, W.-R.: Der Problembezug von Entscheidungsmodellen. Tuebingen 1980.
10. Becker, J.; Rosemann, M.; Schuette, R.: Grundsaetze ordnungsmaessiger Modellierung. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 37 (1995) 5, pp. 435-445.
11. Becker, J.; Rosemann, M.; Schuette, R.; Rotthowe, T.: A Framework for Efficient Information Modeling-Guidelines for Retail Enterprises. Paper accepted at INFORMS Conference on Information Systems and Technology, Montreal, April 1998.
12. Boehm, B. W.: Software Engineering Economics. Englewood Cliffs 1981.
13. Bostrom, R.P.: Successful Application of Communication Techniques to Improve the Systems Development Process. Information & Management, 16 (1989), pp. 279-295.
14. Bunge, M.: Scientific Research I. The Search for Systems. Berlin et al. 1967.
15. Daneva, M.; Heib, R., Scheer, A.-W.: Benchmarking Business Process Models. In: A.-W. Scheer (Ed.), Working papers of the Institut fuer Wirtschaftsinformatik. Heft 136. Saarbruecken 1996.
16. Elmasri, R.; Navathe, S. B.: Fundamentals of Database Systems. 2nd Ed., Redwood City et al. 1994.
17. Hars, A.: Referenzdatenmodelle. Grundlagen effizienter Datenmodellierung. Wiesbaden 1994.
18. Harwryszkiewycz, T.H.: Introduction to systems analysis and design. New York et al. 1991.
19. Hesse, W.; Barkow, G.; Braun, H.v.; Kittlaus, H.-B.; Scheschonk, G.: Terminologie der Softwaretechnik. Ein Begriffssystem fuer die Analyse und Modellierung von Anwendungssystemen. Teil 2. Informatik Spektrum, 17 (1994) 2, pp. 96-105.
20. Hudson, D. L.: Practical Model Management Using CASE Tools. QED Publishing Group Boston, London, Toronto 1993.
21. Keller, G.; Nuettgens, M.; Scheer, A.-W.: Semantische Prozessmodellierung auf der Basis "Ereignisgesteuerter Prozessketten (EPK)". In: A.-W. Scheer (Ed.), Working papers of the Institut fuer Wirtschaftsinformatik, No. 89. Saarbruecken 1992.
22. Krogstie, J.: Conceptual Modeling for Computerized Information Systems Support in Organizations. PhD Thesis, Trondheim 1995.
23. Krogstie, J.; Lindland, O. I.; Sindre, G.: Defining Quality Aspects for Conceptual Models. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information System Concepts (ISCO3). Towards a Consolidation of Views. Marburg 1995. Preprint.
24. Krogstie, J.; Lindland, O. I.; Sindre, G.: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Quality in Requirements Engineering. In: CAiSE 95. J. Iivari, K. Lyytinen, M. Rossi (Eds.). Berlin 1995, pp. 82-95.
25. Krogstie, J.; Sølvberg, A.: A Classification of Methodological Frameworks for Computerized Information Systems in Organizations. In: Method Engineering. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. J. Welke (Eds.). London et al. 1996, pp. 278-295.
26. Lindland, O. I.; Sindre, G.; Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software, 11 (1994) 2, pp. 42-49.
27. Maier, R.: Qualitaet von Datenmodellen. Wiesbaden 1996.
28. Moody, D.: Graphical Entity Relationship Models. Towards a More User Understandable Representation of Data. In: Conceptual Modeling. ER '96. 15th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Cottbus, Germany, October 1996. B. Thalheim (Ed.). Berlin et al. 1996, pp. 227-244.
29. McMenamim, S. M.; Palmer, J. F.: Essential Systems Analysis. New York 1984.
30. Moody, D. L.; Shanks, S.: What Makes a Good Data Model? Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. In: Entity-Relationship Approach-ER 94. Business Modelling and Re-Engineering. P. Loucopoulos (Ed.). Berlin et al.1994, pp. 94-111.
31. Oliver, I.; Langford, H.: Myths of Demons and Users. Evidence and Analysis of Negative Perceptions of Users. In: Information Analysis. Selected Readings. Ed. by R. Galliers. Addison-Wessly Publishing, Sydney et al. 1987, S. 113-123.
32. Ortner, E.; Schienmann, B.: Normative Language Approach. A Framework for Understanding. In: Conceptual Modeling. ER '96. 15th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Cottbus, Germany, October 1996. B. Thalheim (Ed.). Berlin et al. 1996, pp. 261-276.
33. Pohl, K.: Process-Centered Requirements Engineering. Taunton, Somerset 1996.
34. Pohl, K.: The Three Dimension of Requirements Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering-CAiSE 93. C. Rolland, F. Bodart, C. Cauvet (Eds.). Berlin et al. 1993, pp. 275-292.
35. Popper, K. R.: Objective Knowledge. 4th Ed., Oxford 1984.
36. Rauh, O.: Guetekriterien fuer die semantische Datenmodellierung. HMD, 28 (1991) 158, pp. 91-110.
37. Rescher, N.: Pluralism. Against the Demand for Consensus. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1993.
38. Rescher, N.: Objectivity. The Obligations of Impersonal Reason. Notre Dame, London 1997.
39. SAP: R/3 System. (http:///www.sap-ag.de/products/index.htm, 14. July 1998)
40. Scheer, A.-W.: Business Process Reengineering. Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. 2nd ed. Berlin et al. 1994.
41. Schuette, R.: Handelsinformationssysteme. Unpublished presentation, March 14, 1994. Muenster 1994.
42. Schuette, R.: Grundsaetze ordnungsmaessiger Referenzmodellierung. Dissertation, Universitaet Muenster. Muenster 1997 (to be published in Gabler Verlag, Reihe neue betriebswirtschaftliche forschung (nbf), Wiesbaden 1998).
43. Schuette, R.: Grundsaetze ordnungsmäßiger Modellierung. Reformulierung eines Ansatzes zur Informationsmodellqualität. Paper presented at the research colloquium at the Institute for Computer Sciences of the University of Koblenz. Koblenz, 04. Dec 1997. (http://www.wi.uni-muenster.de/is/mitarbeiter/isresc).
44. Shepherd, G. M.: Neurobiology. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press 1989.
45. Seltveit, A. H.: Complexity Reduction in Information Systems Modeling. PhD thesis University of Trondheim. Trondheim 1994.
46. Tamassia, D.; Di Battisti, G.; Batini, C.: Automatic graph drawing and readibility of diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18 (1988) 1, S. 61-79.
47. Ulrich, H.: Die Unternehmung als produktives und soziales System. Bern 1968.
48. Vollmer, G.: Evolutionaere Erkenntnistheorie. 6. Ed., Stuttgart 1994.
49. Zamperoni, A.; Loehr-Richter, P.: Enhancing the Quality of Conceptual Database Specifications through Validation. In: Entity-Relationship-Approach-ER93. R. Elmasri, V. Kouramajian, B. Thalheim (Eds.). Berlin et al. 1994, pp. 85-98.
50. Zelewski, S.: Petrinetzbasierte Modellierung komplexer Produktionssysteme. Band 2. Bezugsrahmen. Working paper no. 6 of Institut für Produktionswirtschaft und Industrielle Informationswirtschaft. Leipzig 1995.
51. Zentes, J.: Die Optimalkomplexion von Entscheidungsmodellen. Ein Beitrag zur betriebswirtschaftlichen Meta-Entscheidungstheorie. Köln et al. 1976.