Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound–shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 173-186

  Ozturk, Ozge ^a   Krehm, Madelaine ^a   Vouloumanos, Athena ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross modal perception; Infant perception; Language acquisition; Preferential looking; Sound symbolism; Synesthesia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONSONANT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANCY; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PERCEPTION; SOUND; SYMBOLISM; SYNESTHESIA; TODDLER; VOWEL; WRITING; ATTENTION; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SYMBOLISM;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 85028099838     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: 10960457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Altschuler, E. L., Vankov, A., Hubbard, E. M., Roberts, E., Ramachandran, V. S., & Pineda, J. A. (2000). Mu wave blocking by observer of movement and its possible use as a tool to study theory of other minds. In Poster session presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, LA.
2. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., Flom, R., Intersensory redundancy guides the development of selective attention, perception, and cognition in infancy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13 (2004), 99–102.
3. Bergelson, E., Swingley, D., At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (2012), 3253–3258.
4. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.08) [computer program]. Retrieved 26 July 2010 from http://www.praat.org.
5. Bonatti, L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., Mehler, J., Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science 16 (2005), 451–459.
6. Calvert, G.A., Campbell, R., Reading speech from still and moving faces: The neural substrates of visible speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 (2003), 57–70.
7. Cohen, L.B., Atkinson, D.J., Chaput, H.H., Habit X: A new program for obtaining and organizing data in infant perception and cognition studies (Version 1.0). 2004, University of Texas, Austin.
8. Cytowic, R.E., Eagleman, D.M., Wednesday is indigo blue: Discovering the brain of synesthesia. 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Cytowic, R.E., Wood, F.B., Synesthesia: I. A review of major theories and their brain basis. Brain and Cognition 1 (1982), 23–35.
10. Davis, R., The fitness of names to drawings: A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology 52 (1961), 259–268.
11. De Saussure, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics. In C. Bally & A. Sechehaye (Eds), R. Harris, Trans. La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1916).
12. Descartes, R., Meditations on first philosophy. 1986, Cambridge University Press, New York (Original work published 1641).
13. Evans, K.K., Treisman, A., Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. Journal of Vision 10 (2010), 1–12.
14. Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S., Bates, E., Thal, D.J., Pethick, S.J., Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59:5 (1994), 1–173 (discussion, pp. 174–185).
15. Fowler, C.A., Brancazio, L., Coarticulation resistance of American English consonants and its effects on trans-consonantal vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Language and Speech 43 (2000), 1–41.
16. Gasser, M. (2004). The origins of arbitrariness in language. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Gibson, J.J., The senses considered as perceptual systems. 1966, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
18. Hochmann, J.R., Benavides-Varela, S., Nespor, M., Mehler, J., Consonants and vowels: Different roles in early language acquisition. Developmental Science 14 (2011), 1445–1458.
19. Hockett, C.F., The view from language: Selected essays 1948–1974. 1977, University of Georgia Press, Athens.
20. Hunter, M.A., Ames, E.W., A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. Advances in Infancy Research 5 (1988), 69–95.
21. Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., Okada, H., Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 109 (2008), 54–65.
22. Keysers, C., Kohler, E., Umilta, M.A., Nanetti, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition. Experimental Brain Research 153 (2003), 628–636.
23. Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M.A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G., Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297 (2002), 846–848.
24. Köhler, W., Gestalt psychology. 2nd ed., 1947, Liveright, New York.
25. Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., Westermann, G., The shape of words in the brain. Cognition 114 (2010), 19–28.
26. Lagefoged, P., Johnson, K., A course in phonetics. 6th ed., 2010, Wadsworth, Boston.
27. Lewkowicz, D.J., The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin 126 (2000), 281–308.
28. Liberman, A.M., Mattingly, I.G., The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21 (1985), 1–36.
29. Ludwig, V.U., Adachi, I., Matsuzawa, T., Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (2011), 20661–20665.
30. Marks, L.E., On cross-modal similarity: Auditory–visual interactions in speeded discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13:3 (1987), 384–394.
31. Maurer, D., Pathman, T., Mondloch, C.J., The shape of boubas: Sound–shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science 9 (2006), 316–322.
32. Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., Fitneva, S.A., The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140 (2011), 325–347.
33. Monaghan, P., Mattock, K., Walker, P., The role of sound symbolism in language learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027747. [Epub ahead of print].
34. Nespor, M., Peña, M., Mehler, J., On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue & Linguaggio 2 (2003), 203–231.
35. Newport, E.L., Aslin, R.N., Learning at a distance. I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48 (2004), 127–162.
36. Nielsen, A., Rendall, D., The sound of round: Evaluating the sound–symbolic role of consonants in the classic takete–maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (2011), 115–124.
37. Nishitani, N., Avikainen, S., Hari, R., Abnormal imitation-related cortical activation sequences in Asperger's syndrome. Annals of Neurology 55 (2004), 558–562.
38. Nygaard, L.C., Cook, A.E., Namy, L.L., Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition 112 (2009), 181–186.
39. Oberman, L.M., Hubbard, E.M., McCleery, J.P., Altschuler, E.L., Ramachandran, V.S., Pineda, J.A., EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research 24 (2005), 190–198.
40. Oberman, L.M., Ramachandran, V.S., Reflections on the mirror neuron system: Their evolutionary functions beyond motor representation. Pineda, J.A., (eds.) Role of mirroring in social cognition, 2008, Humana, Totowa, NJ.
41. Ohala, J.J., Sound symbolism. Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, 1997, Seoul, Korea, SICOL, 98–103.
42. Parault, S.J., Sound symbolic word learning in context. Contemporary Educational Psychology 31 (2006), 228–252.
43. Parault, S.J., Schwanenflugel, P.J., Sound symbolism: A possible piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35 (2006), 329–351.
44. Patterson, M.L., Werker, J.F., Two-month-old infants match phonetic information in lips and voice. Developmental Science 6 (2003), 191–196.
45. Peña, M., Mehler, J., Nespor, M., The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development. Psychological Science 22 (2011), 1419–1421.
46. Pons, F., Toro, J.M., Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants. Cognition 116 (2010), 361–367.
47. Ramachandran, V. S., Azoulai, S., Stone, L., Srinivasan, A. V., & Bijoy, N. (2005, April). Grasping metaphors and thinking with pictures: How brain damage might affect thought and language. In Poster presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
48. Ramachandran, V.S., Hubbard, E.M., Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought, and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (2001), 3–34.
49. Sapir, E., The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5, 1929, 209.
50. Shayan, S., Ozturk, O., Sicoli, M.A., The thickness of pitch: Crossmodal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec. Senses & Society 6 (2011), 96–105.
51. Simner, J., Ward, J., The taste of words on the tip of the tongue. Nature, 444, 2006, 438.
52. Spector, F., Maurer, D., Synesthesia: A new approach to understanding the development of perception. Developmental Psychology 45 (2009), 175–189.
53. Stager, C.L., Werker, J.F., Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature 388 (1997), 381–382.
54. Tanz, C., Sound symbolism in words relating to proximity and distance. Language & Speech 14 (1971), 266–276.
55. Theoret, H., Halligan, E., Kobayashi, M., Fregni, F., Tager-Flusberg, H., Pascual-Leone, A., Impaired motor facilitation during action observation in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Current Biology 15 (2005), 84–85.
56. Thompson, P.D., Estes, Z., Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2011), 2392–2404.
57. Toro, J.M., Shukla, M., Nespor, M., Endress, A., The quest for generalizations over consonants: Asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences. Perception and Psychophysics 70 (2008), 1515–1525.
58. Voeltz, F.K.E., Kilian-Hatz, C., (eds.) Ideophones, 2001, John Benjamins, Amsterdam (Typological Studies in Language, Vol. 44).
59. Wagner, K., Dobkins, K.R., Synaesthetic associations decrease during infancy. Psychological Science 22 (2011), 1067–1072.
60. Walker, P., Bremner, J.G., Mason, U., Spring, J., Mattock, K., Slater, A., et al. Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychological Science 21 (2010), 21–25.
61. 0 in vowels. Journal of Phonetics 23 (1995), 349–366.
62. Wilson, S.M., Saygin, A.P., Sereno, M.I., Iacoboni, M., Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004), 701–702.
63. Zbikowski, L.M., Metaphor and music theory: Reflections from cognitive science. Music Theory Online, 4(1), 1998.