High-risk consumers' perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 191-200

  Quinn, Gwendolyn P ^a,b   Pal, Tuya ^a,b   Murphy, Devin ^c   Vadaparampil, Susan T ^a,b   Kumar, Ambuj ^a,b  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c MILLER CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

hereditary cancers; perspectives; PGD; psychology; psychosocial

Indexed keywords

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; FAMILIAL CANCER; FAMILY HISTORY; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HEREDITARY BREAST AND OVARIAN CANCER SYNDROME; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MEDLINE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PSYCINFO; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 85027939878     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.0b013e31822ddc7e     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Nagy R, Sweet K, Eng C. Highly penetrant hereditary cancer syndromes. Oncogene 2004;23:6445-6470. (Pubitemid 39265509)
2. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer-analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 2000;343:78-85. (Pubitemid 30451850)
3. Garber JE, Offit K. Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:276-292. (Pubitemid 46206879)
4. Sermon K, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Lancet 2004;363:1633-1641. (Pubitemid 38625669)
5. Ogilvie CM, Braude PR, Scriven PN. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis-an overview. J Histochem Cytochem 2005;53:255-260.
6. Baruch S, Kaufman D, Hudson KL. Genetic testing of embryos: practices and perspectives of US in vitro fertilization clinics. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1053-1058. (Pubitemid 351671741)
7. Simpson JL. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years. Prenat Diagn 2010;30:682-695.
8. McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1628-1636. (Pubitemid 41785655)
9. Friedman LC, Kramer RM. Reproductive issues for women with BRCA mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:83-86.
10. Smith KR, Ellington L, Chan AY, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Fertility intentions following testing for a BRCA1 gene mutation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:733-740. (Pubitemid 38737860)
11. Fortuny D, Balmaña J, Graña B, et al. Opinion about reproductive decision making among individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a multicentre Spanish cohort. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1000-1006.
12. Allen C, Reardon W. Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting. BJOG 2005;112:1589-1594. (Pubitemid 43961209)
13. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002;346:725-730. (Pubitemid 34983992)
14. Desmyttere S, Bonduelle M, Nekkebroeck J, Roelants M, Liebaers I, De Schepper J. Growth and health outcome of 102 2-year-old children conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis or screening. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:755-759.
15. Liebaers I, Desmyttere S, Verpoest W, et al. Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2010;25:275-282.
16. Desmyttere S, De Schepper J, Nekkebroeck J, et al. Two-year auxological and medical outcome of singletons born after embryo biopsy applied in preimplantation genetic diagnosis or preimplantation genetic screening. Hum Reprod 2009;24:470-476.
17. Jones BA, McMahon CA. Social representations of stem cell research and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:268-275. (Pubitemid 37259274)
18. Klitzman R, Appelbaum PS, Chung W, Sauer M. Anticipating issues related to increasing preimplantation genetic diagnosis use: a research agenda. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17(suppl 1):33-42.
19. Miedzybrodzka Z, Templeton A, Dean J, Haites N, Mollison J, Smith N. Preimplantation diagnosis or chorionic villus biopsy? Women's attitudes and preferences. Hum Reprod 1993;8:2192-2196. (Pubitemid 24012823)
20. Vadaparampil ST, Quinn GP, Knapp C, Malo TL, Friedman S. Factors associated with preimplantation genetic diagnosis acceptance among women concerned about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Genet Med 2009;11:757-765.
21. Staton AD, Kurian AW, Cobb K, Mills MA, Ford JM. Cancer risk reduction and reproductive concerns in female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Fam Cancer 2008;7:179-186.
22. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Tollin S, et al. BRCA carriers' thoughts on risk management in relation to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and childbearing: when too many choices are just as difficult as none. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2473-2475.
23. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Jacobsen PB, Knapp C, Keefe DL, Bell GE. Frozen hope: fertility preservation for women with cancer. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010;55:175-180.
24. Stuart A, Ord J. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics. Edward Arnold: London, 1994.
25. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560. (Pubitemid 37088507)
26. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-1101.
27. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634. (Pubitemid 27387172)
28. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA 2006;295:676-680. (Pubitemid 43209069)
29. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 2007;4:805-835. (Pubitemid 350295185)
30. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:W65-W94.
31. Menon U, Harper J, Sharma A, et al. Views of BRCA gene mutation carriers on preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a reproductive option for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1573-1577. (Pubitemid 47055145)
32. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, King LM, Miree CA, Friedman S. Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Fam Cancer 2009;8:441-449.
33. Sagi M, Weinberg N, Eilat A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for BRCA1/2-a novel clinical experience. Prenat Diagn 2009;29: 508-513.
34. Quinn G, Vadaparampil S, Wilson C, et al. Attitudes of high-risk women toward preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2009;91:2361-2368.
35. Douma KF, Aaronson NK, Vasen HF, Verhoef S, Gundy CM, Bleiker EM. Attitudes toward genetic testing in childhood and reproductive decision-making for familial adenomatous polyposis. Eur J Hum Genet 2010;18:186-193.
36. Kastrinos F, Stoffel EM, Balmaña J, Syngal S. Attitudes toward prenatal genetic testing in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1284-1290. (Pubitemid 46802017)
37. Lammens C, Bleiker E, Aaronson N, et al. Attitude towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer. Fam Cancer 2009;8:457-464.
38. Borkenhagen A, Brähler E, Wisch S, Stöbel-Richter Y, Strauss B, Kentenich H. Attitudes of German infertile couples towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis for different uses: a comparison to international studies. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2051-2057. (Pubitemid 47062778)
39. Krones T, Schlüter E, Manolopoulos K, et al. Public, expert and patients' opinions on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in Germany. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:116-123. (Pubitemid 40100667)
40. Meister U, Finck C, Stöbel-Richter Y, Schmutzer G, Brähler E. Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany. Hum Reprod 2005;20:231-238.
41. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2008;23:481-492. (Pubitemid 351651197)
42. Marteau T, Michie S, Drake H, Bobrow M. Public attitudes towards the selection of desirable characteristics in children. J Med Genet 1995;32:796-798.
43. Genetics and Public Policy Center. Americans deeply divided about use of genetic technologies in reproduction; first detailed survey probes public's views on 'designer babies' (Princeton Survey Research Associates website) 2004. http://www.dnapolicy.org/images/reportpdfs/Public AwarenessAndAttitudes.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2010.
44. Banerjee I, Shevlin M, Taranissi M, et al. Health of children conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a preliminary outcome study. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:376-381. (Pubitemid 351419457)
45. Pergament E. Preimplantation diagnosis: a patient perspective. Prenat Diagn 1991;11:493-500.
46. Chamayou S, Guglielmino A, Giambona A, et al. Attitude of potential users in Sicily towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis for beta-thalassaemia and aneuploidies. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1936-1944.
47. Shahine LK, Kuppermann M, Davis G, Creasman J, Cedars MI. Patient willingness to participate in a clinical trial with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2008;89:879-884. (Pubitemid 351491228)
48. Snowdon C, Green JM. Preimplantation diagnosis and other reproductive options: attitudes of male and female carriers of recessive disorders. Hum Reprod 1997;12:341-350. (Pubitemid 27129399)
49. Roberts C, Franklin S. Experiencing new forms of genetic choice: findings from an ethnographic study of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2004;7:285-293. (Pubitemid 40100678)
50. Lavery SA, Aurell R, Turner C, Taylor DM, Winston RM. An analysis of the demand for and cost of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the United Kingdom. Prenat Diagn 1999;19:1205-1208. (Pubitemid 30038018)
51. John Hopkins Guide for Patients and Families. Familial adenomatous polyposis. 1994. (Mid-Atlantic Cancer Genetics Network (MACGN)).
52. Lynch HT, Lemon SJ, Durham C, et al. A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results. Cancer 1997;79: 2219-2228. (Pubitemid 27227388)
53. McGowan ML, Burant CJ, Moran R, Farrell R. Patient education and informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: health literacy for genetics and assisted reproductive technology. Genet Med 2009;11:640-645.
54. Kalfoglou AL, Scott J, Hudson K. Attitudes about preconception sex selection: a focus group study with Americans. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2731-2736.
55. Hudson KL. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: public policy and public attitudes. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1638-1645. (Pubitemid 43816439)