Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: public policy and public attitudes

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1638-1645

  Hudson, Kathy L ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

focus groups; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; public opinion; public policy; reproductive genetics; survey

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOETHICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MORALITY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIETY; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOETHICS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33744529521     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Parens E., and Knowles L.P. Reprogenetics and public policy. Reflections and recommendations. Hastings Cent Rep 33 (2003) S3-S5
2. GeneTests, available at http://www.genetests.org; accessed 01/18/06.
3. Verlinsky Y., Cohen J., Munne S., Gianaroli L., Simpson J.L., Ferraretti A.P., et al. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 82 (2004) 302-303
4. Hudson K., Baruch S., and Javitt G. Genetic testing of human embryos. ethical challenges and policy choices. In: Galson A., and Peppard C. (Eds). Expanding horizons in bioethics (2005), Springer, Dordrecht 103-122
5. Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992, §§ 2-7, 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 263a-1-263a-7 (2005).
6. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-399 (2000)).
7. Medical Devices Rule, 21 C.F.R. § 809.10(e) (2005).
8. Classification/Reclassification Rule, 21 C.F.R. § 809.30 (2005).
9. Restricted Devices Rule, 21 C.F.R. 864.4010(a) (2005).
10. Analyte Specific Reagents Rule, 21 C.F.R. § 864.4020 (2005).
11. Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products Rule, 21 C.F.R. §§ 1271.1-1271.20 (2004).
12. Establishment Registration and Listing Rule, 21 C.F.R. §§ 1271.21-1271.37 (2004).
13. 42 U.S.C. §§ 201-237, 262 (2000).
14. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Human cells used in therapy involving the transfer of genetic material by means other than the union of gamete nuclei. FDA letter to sponsors/researchers. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cber/ltr/cytotrans070601.htm; accessed 01/18/06.
15. 42 U.S.C. §§ 263-263b (2000).
16. 45 C.F.R. § 46 (2005).
17. 21 C.F.R. § 50, 56 (2005).
18. Dresser R. Genetic modification of preimplantation embryos. toward adequate human research policies format. Milbank Q 82 1 (2004) 195-214
19. Balanced Budget Downpayment Act I of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-99, § 128, 110 Stat. 26, 34 (1996).
20. La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 9:129 (2005).
21. Implementation of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992-A Model Program for the Certification of Embryo Laboratories, 64 Fed. Reg. 39374 (July 21, 1999).
22. NY Pub. Health §§ 570-581 (2005).
23. NY Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 10, §58 (2005).
24. Doolan v. IVF Am., Inc., 12 Mass. L. Rep. 482 (Super. Ct. 2000).
25. Crockin S.L. Reproduction, genetics, and the law. Reprod BioMed Online 3 1 (2005) 37-38
26. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 82 Suppl 1 (2004) 120-122
27. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 82 Suppl 1 (2004) 245-248
28. Thornhill A, Harper J, Sermon K, deDie C, Geraedts J, Harton G, et al. Best practice guidelines for clinical PGD/PGS testing. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology PGD Consortium. Available at: http://www.eshre.com/emc.asp?pageId=418; accessed 01/18/06.
29. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society. Guidelines for good practice in PGD. Reprod BioMed Online 9 (2004) 430-434
30. College of American Pathologists. Standards for laboratory accreditation. Reproductive laboratory accreditation program, 1997. Available at: http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/laboratory_accreditation/standards/standards.html; accessed 01/18/06.
31. Kalfoglou A., Doksum T., Bernhardt B., Geller G., LeRoy L., Mathews D., et al. Opinions about new reproductive genetic technologies. hopes and fears for our genetic future. Fertil Steril 83 (2005) 1612-1621
32. Kalfoglou A., Scott J., and Hudson K. PGD patients' and providers' attitudes to the use and regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reprod BioMed Online 11 (2005) 486-496
33. Genetics and Public Policy Center. Reproductive genetic testing: what America thinks. December 2004. Available at: http://www.DNApolicy.org; accessed February 7, 2005.
34. Genetics and Public Policy Center. Public awareness and attitudes about reproductive genetic technology. December 9, 2002. Available at: http://www.DNApolicy.org; accessed February 7, 2005.
35. Transcripts of meetings of The President's Council on Bioethics. Available at: http://www.bioethics.gov; accessed February 7, 2005.