-
1
-
-
33846695194
-
Committee on Ethics. ACOG committee opinion #360: Sex selection
-
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG
-
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Ethics. ACOG committee opinion #360: Sex selection. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:475-478.
-
(2007)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.109
, pp. 475-478
-
-
-
2
-
-
4444229349
-
Ethics Committee. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons
-
American Society for Reproductive Medicine ASRM
-
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Ethics Committee. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril 2004;82:S232-S235.
-
(2004)
Fertil Steril
, vol.82
-
-
-
3
-
-
0033603659
-
-
Belkin L. Getting the girl. N Y Times Mag 1999, 25 July, 26-31, 38, 54, 55.
-
Belkin L. Getting the girl. N Y Times Mag 1999, 25 July, 26-31, 38, 54, 55.
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
0032936919
-
Sexism and racism in preconceptive trait selection
-
Berkowitz JM. Sexism and racism in preconceptive trait selection. Fertil Steril 1999;71:415-417.
-
(1999)
Fertil Steril
, vol.71
, pp. 415-417
-
-
Berkowitz, J.M.1
-
5
-
-
56749152151
-
Ethical objections to sex selection for non-medical reasons
-
Blyth E, Frith L, Crawshaw M. Ethical objections to sex selection for non-medical reasons. RMB Online 2008;14(Suppl 1):41-45.
-
(2008)
RMB Online
, vol.14
, Issue.SUPPL. 1
, pp. 41-45
-
-
Blyth, E.1
Frith, L.2
Crawshaw, M.3
-
6
-
-
0018184037
-
The failure to separate human X- and Y-spermatozoa by the millipore filtration technique
-
Broer KH, Dauber U, Kaiser R, Schumacher GF. The failure to separate human X- and Y-spermatozoa by the millipore filtration technique. J Reprod Med 1978;20:67-69.
-
(1978)
J Reprod Med
, vol.20
, pp. 67-69
-
-
Broer, K.H.1
Dauber, U.2
Kaiser, R.3
Schumacher, G.F.4
-
8
-
-
33645096278
-
Assisted reproduction and gender selection: "why boys?
-
Confine E, Kazer RR, Zhang JX. Assisted reproduction and gender selection: "why boys?". Int J Fertil 2006;51:11-13.
-
(2006)
Int J Fertil
, vol.51
, pp. 11-13
-
-
Confine, E.1
Kazer, R.R.2
Zhang, J.X.3
-
9
-
-
0345307089
-
Procreative liberty: The case for preconception sex selection
-
Dahl E. Procreative liberty: the case for preconception sex selection. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:380-384.
-
(2003)
Reprod Biomed Online
, vol.7
, pp. 380-384
-
-
Dahl, E.1
-
10
-
-
1642299818
-
The presumption in favour of liberty: A comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection
-
Dahl E. The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;8:266-267.
-
(2004)
Reprod Biomed Online
, vol.8
, pp. 266-267
-
-
Dahl, E.1
-
11
-
-
33750951043
-
Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: Empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US
-
Dahl E, Beutel M, Brosig B, Grussner S. Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006;23:311-318.
-
(2006)
J Assist Reprod Genet
, vol.23
, pp. 311-318
-
-
Dahl, E.1
Beutel, M.2
Brosig, B.3
Grussner, S.4
-
12
-
-
84983967825
-
Sex of children: A community analysis of preferences and predetermination attitudes
-
Dixon RD, Levy DE. Sex of children: a community analysis of preferences and predetermination attitudes. Sociol Q 1985;26:251-271.
-
(1985)
Sociol Q
, vol.26
, pp. 251-271
-
-
Dixon, R.D.1
Levy, D.E.2
-
13
-
-
0028089728
-
Sex selection via albumin columns: 20 years results
-
Ericsson RJ. Sex selection via albumin columns: 20 years results. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1787-1791.
-
(1994)
Hum Reprod
, vol.9
, pp. 1787-1791
-
-
Ericsson, R.J.1
-
14
-
-
0015753016
-
Isolation of fractions rich in human Y bearing sperm
-
Ericsson RJ, Langevin CN, Nishino M. Isolation of fractions rich in human Y bearing sperm. Nature 1973;246:421-424.
-
(1973)
Nature
, vol.246
, pp. 421-424
-
-
Ericsson, R.J.1
Langevin, C.N.2
Nishino, M.3
-
15
-
-
0030959081
-
Albumin gradients do not enrich Y-bearing human spermatozoa
-
Flaherty SP, Michalowska J, Swann NJ, Dmowski WP, Matthews CD, Aitken RJ. Albumin gradients do not enrich Y-bearing human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1997;12:938-942.
-
(1997)
Hum Reprod
, vol.12
, pp. 938-942
-
-
Flaherty, S.P.1
Michalowska, J.2
Swann, N.J.3
Dmowski, W.P.4
Matthews, C.D.5
Aitken, R.J.6
-
16
-
-
0031659860
-
Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and medical insemination, IVF, or ICSI
-
Fugger EF, Black SH, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD. Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and medical insemination, IVF, or ICSI. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2367-2370.
-
(1998)
Hum Reprod
, vol.13
, pp. 2367-2370
-
-
Fugger, E.F.1
Black, S.H.2
Keyvanfar, K.3
Schulman, J.D.4
-
17
-
-
0017327428
-
Sex preselection
-
Glass RH. Sex preselection. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49:122-126.
-
(1977)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.49
, pp. 122-126
-
-
Glass, R.H.1
-
18
-
-
56749170474
-
Boy? Girl? Up to you: The long-sought ability to choose a baby's gender may finally be a reality
-
21 September, 9171,989125,00.html 24 June, date last accessed
-
Golden F. Boy? Girl? Up to you: the long-sought ability to choose a baby's gender may finally be a reality. Time 1998, 21 September. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,989125,00.html (24 June 2007, date last accessed).
-
(1998)
Time
-
-
Golden, F.1
-
19
-
-
33947722815
-
Girl or boy? As fertility technology advances, so does an ethical debate
-
6 February
-
Grady D. Girl or boy? As fertility technology advances, so does an ethical debate. N Y Times 2007, 6 February, F5, F10.
-
(2007)
N Y Times
, vol.F5
-
-
Grady, D.1
-
20
-
-
33746630130
-
Attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons: A review
-
Hall S, Reid E, Marteau TM. Attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons: a review. Prenat Diagn 2006;26:619-626.
-
(2006)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.26
, pp. 619-626
-
-
Hall, S.1
Reid, E.2
Marteau, T.M.3
-
21
-
-
0017760849
-
A simple and reproducible method for separating Y-bearing spermatozoa from human semen
-
Hegde UC, Shastry PR, Rao SS. A simple and reproducible method for separating Y-bearing spermatozoa from human semen. Indian J Med Res 1977;65:738-740.
-
(1977)
Indian J Med Res
, vol.65
, pp. 738-740
-
-
Hegde, U.C.1
Shastry, P.R.2
Rao, S.S.3
-
22
-
-
34248388962
-
Parental Love and the Ethics of Sex Selection
-
Herissone-Kelly P. Parental Love and the Ethics of Sex Selection. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2007a;16:326-335.
-
(2007)
Camb Q Healthc Ethics
, vol.16
, pp. 326-335
-
-
Herissone-Kelly, P.1
-
23
-
-
34547938882
-
The "parental love" objection to non-medical sex selection: Deepening the argument
-
Herissone-Kelly P. The "parental love" objection to non-medical sex selection: deepening the argument. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2007b;16:446-455.
-
(2007)
Camb Q Healthc Ethics
, vol.16
, pp. 446-455
-
-
Herissone-Kelly, P.1
-
24
-
-
41049096233
-
Preconception sex selection: A survey of visitors to an internet-based health forum
-
Himmel W, Dahl E, Michelmann HW. Preconception sex selection: a survey of visitors to an internet-based health forum. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16(Suppl 1):18-26.
-
(2008)
Reprod Biomed Online
, vol.16
, Issue.SUPPL. 1
, pp. 18-26
-
-
Himmel, W.1
Dahl, E.2
Michelmann, H.W.3
-
25
-
-
56749159934
-
-
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Sex selection: Options for Regulation. Appendix E Prepared for: HFEA by Counterpoint (UK) Limited. Appendix F Prepared by MORI (Market & Opinion Research International). Social Research Institute. 2003. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/ en/1511.html#sex_selection (26 June 2007, date last accessed).
-
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Sex selection: Options for Regulation. Appendix E Prepared for: HFEA by Counterpoint (UK) Limited. Appendix F Prepared by MORI (Market & Opinion Research International). Social Research Institute. 2003. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/ en/1511.html#sex_selection (26 June 2007, date last accessed).
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
14844288380
-
Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences in an infertility population
-
Jain T, Missmer SA, Gupta RS, Hornstein MD. Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences in an infertility population. Fertil Steril 2005;83:649-658.
-
(2005)
Fertil Steril
, vol.83
, pp. 649-658
-
-
Jain, T.1
Missmer, S.A.2
Gupta, R.S.3
Hornstein, M.D.4
-
28
-
-
1442332843
-
Brave new babies
-
26 January
-
Kalb C. Brave new babies. Newsweek 2004, 26 January.
-
(2004)
Newsweek
-
-
Kalb, C.1
-
29
-
-
20444482493
-
Opinions about new reproductive genetic technologies: Hopes and fears for our genetic future
-
Kalfoglou AL, Doksum T, Bernhardt B, Geller G, LeRoy L, Mathews DJH, Evans JH, Doukas DJ, Reame N, Scott J et al. Opinions about new reproductive genetic technologies: hopes and fears for our genetic future. Fertil Steril 2005;83:1612-1621.
-
(2005)
Fertil Steril
, vol.83
, pp. 1612-1621
-
-
Kalfoglou, A.L.1
Doksum, T.2
Bernhardt, B.3
Geller, G.4
LeRoy, L.5
Mathews, D.J.H.6
Evans, J.H.7
Doukas, D.J.8
Reame, N.9
Scott, J.10
-
31
-
-
0028997974
-
Social aspects of >800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children
-
Liu P, Rose GA. Social aspects of >800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children. Hum Reprod 1995;10:968-971.
-
(1995)
Hum Reprod
, vol.10
, pp. 968-971
-
-
Liu, P.1
Rose, G.A.2
-
32
-
-
0036153650
-
Preference for a first-born boy in Western societies
-
Marleau JD, Saucier JF. Preference for a first-born boy in Western societies. J Biosoc Sci 2002;34:13-27.
-
(2002)
J Biosoc Sci
, vol.34
, pp. 13-27
-
-
Marleau, J.D.1
Saucier, J.F.2
-
33
-
-
0344326343
-
Swimming upstream: Views on the ethics of preconception gender selection
-
Mastroianni L, Jr. Swimming upstream: views on the ethics of preconception gender selection. J Androl 1999;20:332-335.
-
(1999)
J Androl
, vol.20
, pp. 332-335
-
-
Mastroianni Jr., L.1
-
34
-
-
0034785166
-
Why sex selection should be legal
-
McCarthy D. Why sex selection should be legal. J Med Ethics 2001;27:302-307.
-
(2001)
J Med Ethics
, vol.27
, pp. 302-307
-
-
McCarthy, D.1
-
35
-
-
27144559206
-
Acting parentally: An argument against sex selection
-
26 June, date last accessed
-
McDougall R. Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection. J Med Ethics 2005;31:601-605. www.microsort.net (26 June 2007, date last accessed).
-
(2005)
J Med Ethics
, vol.31
, pp. 601-605
-
-
McDougall, R.1
-
36
-
-
33847202951
-
Sex selection for non-medical purposes
-
Milliez JM. Sex selection for non-medical purposes. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14(Suppl 1):114-117.
-
(2007)
Reprod Biomed Online
, vol.14
, Issue.SUPPL. 1
, pp. 114-117
-
-
Milliez, J.M.1
-
37
-
-
37349099409
-
Is preconception sex selection necessarily sexist?
-
Purdy L. Is preconception sex selection necessarily sexist? Reprod Biomed Online 2007;15(Suppl 2):33-37.
-
(2007)
Reprod Biomed Online
, vol.15
, Issue.SUPPL. 2
, pp. 33-37
-
-
Purdy, L.1
-
38
-
-
0030846414
-
Evaluating sex chromosome content of sorted human sperm samples with use of dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization
-
Richards WE, Dobin SM, Malone V, Knight AB, Kuehl TJ. Evaluating sex chromosome content of sorted human sperm samples with use of dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176: 1172-1180.
-
(1997)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.176
, pp. 1172-1180
-
-
Richards, W.E.1
Dobin, S.M.2
Malone, V.3
Knight, A.B.4
Kuehl, T.J.5
-
39
-
-
0035748764
-
-
Robertson JA. Preconception gender selection. Am J Bioeth 2001;1:2-9. See all commentaries in this issue.
-
Robertson JA. Preconception gender selection. Am J Bioeth 2001;1:2-9. See all commentaries in this issue.
-
-
-
-
40
-
-
8544253206
-
Gender selection: Pressure from patients and industry should not alter our adherence to ethical guidelines
-
Sauer MV. Gender selection: pressure from patients and industry should not alter our adherence to ethical guidelines. Am J Ob Gyn 2004;191: 1543-1545.
-
(2004)
Am J Ob Gyn
, vol.191
, pp. 1543-1545
-
-
Sauer, M.V.1
-
41
-
-
33646340141
-
Chance, choice and control: Lay debate on prenatal social sex selection
-
Scully JL, Banks S, Shakespeare TW. Chance, choice and control: Lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Soc Sci Med 2006a;63:21- 31.
-
(2006)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.63
, pp. 21-31
-
-
Scully, J.L.1
Banks, S.2
Shakespeare, T.W.3
-
42
-
-
33845864413
-
Gift not commodity? Lay people deliberating social sex selection
-
Scully JL, Shakespeare T, Banks S. Gift not commodity? Lay people deliberating social sex selection. Sociol Health Illn 2006b;28:749-767.
-
(2006)
Sociol Health Illn
, vol.28
, pp. 749-767
-
-
Scully, J.L.1
Shakespeare, T.2
Banks, S.3
-
43
-
-
0017662380
-
Use of Ficoll-sodium metrizoate density gradient to separate human X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa
-
Shastry PR, Hegle UC, Rao SS. Use of Ficoll-sodium metrizoate density gradient to separate human X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa. Nature 1977;269:58-60.
-
(1977)
Nature
, vol.269
, pp. 58-60
-
-
Shastry, P.R.1
Hegle, U.C.2
Rao, S.S.3
-
44
-
-
85047699946
-
Preference for sex of child among preimiparious women
-
Steinbacher R, Gilroy FD. Preference for sex of child among preimiparious women. J Psychol 1985;119:541-547.
-
(1985)
J Psychol
, vol.119
, pp. 541-547
-
-
Steinbacher, R.1
Gilroy, F.D.2
-
45
-
-
0032942239
-
Gender selection: A crime against humanity or the exercise of a fundamental right?
-
Sureau C. Gender selection: a crime against humanity or the exercise of a fundamental right? Hum Reprod 1999;14:867-872.
-
(1999)
Hum Reprod
, vol.14
, pp. 867-872
-
-
Sureau, C.1
-
46
-
-
0036616940
-
Firstborn preference and attitudes toward using sex selection technology
-
Swetkis D, Gilroy FD, Steinbacher R. Firstborn preference and attitudes toward using sex selection technology. J Genet Psychol 2002;163:228-238.
-
(2002)
J Genet Psychol
, vol.163
, pp. 228-238
-
-
Swetkis, D.1
Gilroy, F.D.2
Steinbacher, R.3
-
47
-
-
33746606801
-
Attitudes towards sex selection in the Western world
-
Van Balen F. Attitudes towards sex selection in the Western world. Prenat Diagn 2006;26:614-618.
-
(2006)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.26
, pp. 614-618
-
-
Van Balen, F.1
-
48
-
-
0027564488
-
Fetal sex preference of second-trimester gravidas
-
Walker MK, Conner GK. Fetal sex preference of second-trimester gravidas. J Nurse Midwifery 1993;38:110-113.
-
(1993)
J Nurse Midwifery
, vol.38
, pp. 110-113
-
-
Walker, M.K.1
Conner, G.K.2
-
49
-
-
0028282415
-
Discontinuous Percoll gradients enrich X-bearing human spermatozoa: A study using double-label fluorescence in-situ hybridization
-
Wang HX, Flaherty SP, Swann NJ, Mathews CD. Discontinuous Percoll gradients enrich X-bearing human spermatozoa: a study using double-label fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1265-1270.
-
(1994)
Hum Reprod
, vol.9
, pp. 1265-1270
-
-
Wang, H.X.1
Flaherty, S.P.2
Swann, N.J.3
Mathews, C.D.4
-
50
-
-
56749102590
-
Gender vending
-
19840,647578_1,00.html, 24 June, date last accessed
-
Weber L. Gender vending. Baby Talk. http://www.parenting.com/ parenting/article/0,19840,647578_1,00.html? (24 June 2007, date last accessed).
-
(2007)
Baby Talk
-
-
Weber, L.1
-
52
-
-
33846507395
-
Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selection: A survey among pregnant women in Pakistan
-
Zubair F, Dahl E, Sher Shah S, Ahmed M, Brosig B. Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in Pakistan. Hum Reprod 2007;22:605-609.
-
(2007)
Hum Reprod
, vol.22
, pp. 605-609
-
-
Zubair, F.1
Dahl, E.2
Sher Shah, S.3
Ahmed, M.4
Brosig, B.5
|