The Effectiveness of Online Versus In-person Library Instruction on Finding Empirical Communication Research

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 149-154

  Silk, Kami J ^a   Perrault, Evan K ^b   Ladenson, Sharon ^a   Nazione, Samantha A ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE   (United States)

^c BERRY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

In person learning; Library research; Online education; Undergraduate education

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027936716     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allen I.E., Seaman J. Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States Retrieved from:. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf.
2. Anderson K., May F.A. Does the method of instruction matter? An experimental examination of information literacy instruction in the online, blended, and face-to-face classrooms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2010, 36:495-500.
3. Bruckman A.S. Student research and the internet. Communication of the ACM 2005, 48(12):35-37.
4. Chong E.K.M. Using blogging to enhance the initiation of students into academic research. Computers & Education 2010, 55:798-807.
5. Clark S., Chinburg S. Research performance in undergraduates receiving face-to-face versus online library instruction: A citation analysis. Journal of Library Administration 2010, 50:530-542.
6. Huckstadt A., Hayes K. Evaluation of interactive online courses for advanced practice nurses. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2005, 17:85-89.
7. Johnson S.D., Aragon S.R., Shaik N., Palma-Rivas N. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 2000, 11:29-49.
8. Jones C., Reichard C., Mokhtari K. Are students' learning styles discipline specific?. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 2003, 27:363-375.
9. Kraemer E.W., Lombardo S.V., Lepkowski F.J. The librarian, the machine, or a little of both: a comparative study of three information literacy pedagogies at Oakland University. College & Research Libraries 2007, 68:330-342.
10. Silver S.L., Nickel L.T. Are online tutorials effective? A comparison of online and classroom library instruction methods. Research Strategies 2007, 20:389-396.
11. Summers J.J., Waigandt A., Whittaker T.A. A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education 2005, 29:233-250.
12. Tricarico M.A., von Daum Tholl S., O'Malley E. Interactive online instruction for library research: The small academic library experience. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2001, 27:220-223.
13. U.S.Department of Education Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies Retrieved from:. http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.
14. Wuensch K.L., Aziz S., Ozan E., Kishore M., Tabrizi M.H.N. Pedagogical characteristics of online and face-to-face classes. International Journal on ELearning 2008, 7(3):523-532.
15. Yi H. Library instruction goes online: An inevitable trend. Library Review 2005, 54:47-58.
16. Zhang L., Watson E.M., Banfield L. The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2007, 33:478-484.