Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A citation analysis

Journal of Library Administration

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 530-542

  Clark, Sarah ^a   Chinburg, Susan ^a  

^a ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Bibliography; Citation indexes; Distance education; Information literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955733422     PISSN: 01930826     EISSN: 15403564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01930826.2010.488599     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Association of College & Research Libraries. (2008, July 1). Guidelines for distance learning library services. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/guidelinesdistancelearning.cfm
2. Bielema, C. D., Crocker, J., Miller, T., Raynolds-Moehrle, J., & Shaw, H. (2007). Faculty and library collaborations: A case study and proposal for online learning environments. Research Strategies, 20(4), 334-345.
3. Chesnut, M. T., Henderson, S. M., Schlipp, J., & Zai, R. (2009). Value-added library resources & services through Blackboard. Kentucky Libraries, 73(1), 6-12.
4. Clarke, M. E., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). Citation behaviour of information science students II: Postgraduate students. Education for Information, 24(1), 1-30.
5. Davis, P. M. (2002). The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior: A 2000 update. College & Research Libraries, 63(1), 53-58.
6. Davis, P. M. (2003). Effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholarship in a networked age. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 3(1), 41-51.
7. Davis, P. M., & Cohen, S. A. (2001). The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(4), 309-314.
8. Dewey, B. I. (2005). The embedded librarian: Strategic campus collaborations. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 17, 5-17.
9. Dykeman, A., & King, B. (1983). Term paper analysis: A proposal for evaluating bibliographic instruction. Research Strategies, 1(1), 14-21.
10. Edzan, N. N. (2007). Tracing information literacy of computer science undergraduates: A content analysis of students' academic exercise. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(1), 97-109.
11. Getty, N. K., Burd, B., Burns, S. K., & Piele, L. (2000). Using courseware to deliver library instruction via the web: Four examples;Reference Services Review, 28(4), 349-60.
12. Gratch, B. (1985). Toward a methodology for evaluating research paper bibliographies. Research Strategies, 3(4), 170-177.
13. Hovde, K. (2000). Check the citation: Library instruction and student paper bibliographies. Research Strategies, 17(1), 3-9.
14. Hurst, S., & Leonard, J. (2007). Garbage in, garbage out: The effect of library instruction on the quality of students' term papers. Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship, 8(1). Retrieved August 1, 2009, from http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v08n01/hursts01.htm
15. Laguardia, C., & Katz, W. A. (2008). Magazines for libraries (17th ed.). New Providence, NJ: ProQuest.
16. Matthew, V., & Schroeder, A. (2006). The embedded librarian program. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(4), 61-65.
17. Ramsay, K. M., & Kinnie, J. (2006). The embedded librarian. Library Journal, 131(6), 34-35.
18. Robinson, A. M., & Schlegl, K. (2005). Student use of the internet for research projects: A problem? Our problem? What can we do about it? PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(2), 311-315.
19. Rogers State University. (n.d.). RSU online. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://www.rsu.edu/rsuonline/index.asp Sloan Consortium, The. Staying the course: Online education in the United States, 2008. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/stayingthecourse.pdf
20. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
21. Tuñńon, J., & Brydges, B. (2006). A study on using rubrics and citation analysis to measure the quality of doctoral dissertation reference lists from traditional and nontraditional institutions. Journal of Library Administration, 45(3), 459-481.
22. Tunon, J., & Brydges, B. (2009). Expanded assessment study examining the citation patterns from traditional and nontraditional institutions and their effect upon the quality of doctoral dissertation reference lists. Journal of Library Administration, 49(1), 137-159.
23. York, A. (2006). The embedded librarian service at MTSU. Tennessee Libraries, 56(2), 305-311.
24. York, A. C., & Vance, J. M. (2009). Taking library instruction into the online classroom: Best practices for embedded librarians. Journal of Library Administration, 49(1), 197-209.
25. Zhang, L., Watson, E. M., & Banfield, L. (2007). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(4), 478-484.