Bacterial nanocellulose: The future of controlled drug delivery?

Therapeutic Delivery

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 753-761

  Pötzinger, Yvette ^a   Kralisch, Dana ^a   Fischer, Dagmar ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

bacterial nanocellulose; controlled release; drug delivery; production; storage

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; BACTERIAL NANOCELLULOSE; BIOPOLYMER; CHITOSAN; DICLOFENAC; GELATIN; IBUPROFEN; LIDOCAINE; NANOPARTICLE; OCTENIDINE; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; RETINOL; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; CELLULOSE; DRUG CARRIER; NANOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED DRUG RELEASE; COVALENT BOND; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG SOLUBILITY; ENCAPSULATION; FREEZE DRYING; HUMAN; LIPOPHILICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; WOUND DRESSING; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM;

BACTERIA; CELLULOSE; DRUG CARRIERS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES;

EID: 85027847162     PISSN: 20415990     EISSN: 20416008     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4155/tde-2017-0059     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(24), 5438-5466 (2011).
2. Duran N, Lemes AP, Seabra AB. Review of cellulose nanocrystals patents: Preparation, composites and general applications. Recent. Pat. Nanotech. 6(1), 16-28 (2012).
3. Schlufter K, Schmauder H-P, Dorn S, Heinze T. Efficient homogeneous chemical modification of bacterial cellulose in the ionic liquid 1-N-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Macromol. Rapid. Comm. 27(19), 1670-1676 (2006).
4. Barud HS, Ribeiro CA, Crespi MS et al. Thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose-phosphate composite membranes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 87(3), 815-818 (2007).
5. Lin N, Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 59, 302-325 (2014).
6. Jeong SI, Lee SE, Yang H, Jin Y-H, Park C-S, Park YS. Toxicologic evaluation of bacterial synthesized cellulose in endothelial cells and animals. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 6(4), 370-377 (2010).
7. Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 76(2), 431-438 (2006).
8. Schumann DA, Wippermann J, Klemm DO et al. Artificial vascular implants from bacterial cellulose: Preliminary results of small arterial substitutes. Cellulose 16(5), 877-885 (2009).
9. Almeida IF, Pereira T, Silva NHCS et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as drug-delivery systems: An in vivo skin compatibility study. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 86(3), 332-336 (2014).
10. Frost & Sullivan. Emerging applications of nanocellulose technology. https://store.frost.com/emerging-applications-of-nanocellulose-technology.html
11. Mosti G, Mattaliano V, Schmitz M. New antimicrobial wound dressing with polyhexanide Suprasorb® X + PHMB, first in vitro and clinical results. Presented at: Annual Congress of the German Society for Wound Healing and Wound Care. Berlin, Germany, 9-10 March 2007.
12. Bruckner M, Schwarz C, Otto F, Heillinger J, Wild T. Evaluation of cellulose and polyhexamethylene biguanide (Suprasorb® X+PHMB) in therapy of infected wounds. EWMA J. (Suppl.) 8(2), 54 (2008).
13. Bowil Biotech Sp. z o.o. www.bowil.pl
14. Silva NHCS, Rodrigues AF, Almeida IF et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as transdermal delivery systems for diclofenac: In vitro dissolution and permeation studies. Carbohyd. Polym. 106, 264-269 (2014).
15. Moritz S, Wiegand C, Wesarg F et al. Active wound dressings based on bacterial nanocellulose as drug-delivery system for octenidine. Int. J. Pharm. 471(1-2), 45-55 (2014).
16. Trovatti E, Freire CS, Pinto PC et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes applied in topical and transdermal delivery of lidocaine hydrochloride and ibuprofen: In vitro diffusion studies. Int. J. Pharm. 435(1), 83-87 (2012).
17. Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T. Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose 23(4), 2291-2314 (2016).
18. Wiegand C, Moritz S, Hessler N et al. Antimicrobial functionalization of bacterial nanocellulose by loading with polihexanide and povidone-iodine. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 26(10), 245 (2015).
19. Ahmad N, Amin MCIM, Mahali SM, Ismail I, Chuang VTG. Biocompatible and mucoadhesive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels for oral protein delivery. Mol. Pharm. 11(11), 4130-4142 (2014).
20. Müller A, Ni Z, Hessler N et al. The biopolymer bacterial nanocellulose as drug-delivery system: Investigation of drug loading and release using the model protein albumin. J. Pharm. Sci. 102(2), 579-592 (2013).
21. Sampaio LMP, Padraõ J, Faria J et al. Laccase immobilization on bacterial nanocellulose membranes: Antimicrobial, kinetic and stability properties. Carbohyd. Polym. 145, 1-12 (2016).
22. Wu S-C, Wu S-M, Su F-M. Novel process for immobilizing an enzyme on a bacterial cellulose membrane through repeated absorption. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 92(1), 109-114 (2017).
23. Ullah H, Badshah M, Mäkilä E et al. Fabrication, characterization and evaluation of bacterial cellulose-based capsule shells for oral drug delivery. Cellulose 1-10 (2017).
24. Huang L, Chen X, Nguyen TX, Tang H, Zhang L, Yang G. Nano-cellulose 3D-networks as controlled-release drug carriers. J. Mater. Chem. B 1(23), 2976-2984 (2013).
25. Yoshino A, Tabuchi M, Uo M et al. Applicability of bacterial cellulose as an alternative to paper points in endodontic treatment. Acta Biomater. 9(4), 6116-6122 (2013).
26. Rouabhia M, Asselin J, Tazi N, Messaddeq Y, Levinson D, Zhang Z. Production of biocompatible and antimicrobial bacterial cellulose polymers functionalized by RGDC grafting groups and gentamicin. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6(3), 1439-1446 (2014).
27. Liyaskina E, Revin V, Paramonova E et al. Nanomaterials from bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 784(1), 012034 (2017).
28. Shao W, Liu H, Wang S et al. Controlled release and antibacterial activity of tetracycline hydrochloride-loaded bacterial cellulose composite membranes. Carbohyd. Polym. 145, 114-120 (2016).
29. Shi X, Zheng Y, Wang G, Lin Q, Fan J. pH-and electro-response characteristics of bacterial cellulose nanofiber/sodium alginate hybrid hydrogels for dual controlled drug delivery. RSC Adv. 4(87), 47056-47065 (2014).
30. Trovatti E, Silva NH, Duarte IF et al. Biocellulose membranes as supports for dermal release of lidocaine. Biomacromolecules 12(11), 4162-4168 (2011).
31. Cacicedo ML, Cesca K, Bosio VE, Porto LM, Castro GR. Self-assembly of carrageenin-CaCO3 hybrid microparticles on bacterial cellulose films for doxorubicin sustained delivery. J. Appl. Biomed. 13(3), 239-248 (2015).
32. Müller A, Wesarg F, Hessler N, Müller FA, Kralisch D, Fischer D. Loading of bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels with proteins using a high-speed technique. Carbohyd. Polym. 106, 410-413 (2014).
33. Mohite BV, Suryawanshi RK, Patil SV. Study on the drug loading and release potential of bacterial cellulose. Cell. Chem. Technol. 50(2), 219-223 (2016).
34. Alkhatib Y, Dewaldt M, Moritz S, Nitzsche R, Kralisch D, Fischer D. Controlled extended octenidine release from a bacterial nanocellulose/poloxamer hybrid system. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 112, 164-176 (2017).
35. Aramwit P, Bang N. The characteristics of bacterial nanocellulose gel releasing silk sericin for facial treatment. BMC Biotechnol. 14, 104 (2014).
36. Cacicedo ML, León IE, Gonzalez JS, Porto LM, Alvarez VA, Castro GR. Modified bacterial cellulose scaffolds for localized doxorubicin release in human colorectal HT-29 cells. Colloid. Surface. B 140, 421-429 (2016).
37. Li J, Wan Y, Li L, Liang H, Wang J. Preparation and characterization of 2, 3-dialdehyde bacterial cellulose for potential biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 29(5), 1635-1642 (2009).
38. Hu W, Chen S, Yang J, Li Z, Wang H. Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohyd. Polym. 101, 1043-1060 (2014).
39. Alosmanov R, Wolski K, Zapotoczny S. Grafting of thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) from wet bacterial cellulose sheets to improve its swelling-drying ability. Cellulose 24(1), 285-293 (2017).
40. Pavaloiu R-D, Stoica-Guzun A, Dobre T. Swelling studies of composite hydrogels based on bacterial cellulose and gelatin. U.P.B. Sci. Bull. Ser. B 77(1), 53-62 (2015).
41. Pavaloiu R-D, Stoica-Guzun A, Stroescu M, Jinga SI, Dobre T. Composite films of poly(vinyl alcohol)-chitosan-bacterial cellulose for drug controlled release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 68, 117-124 (2014).
42. Numata Y, Mazzarino L, Borsali R. A slow-release system of bacterial cellulose gel and nanoparticles for hydrophobic active ingredients. Int. J. Pharm. 486(1-2), 217-225 (2015).
43. Luo H, Ao H, Li G et al. Bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel drug-delivery system. Curr. Appl. Phys. 17(2), 249-254 (2017).
44. Sukhtezari S, Almasi H, Pirsa S, Zandi M, Pirouzifard M. Development of bacterial cellulose based slow-release active films by incorporation of Scrophularia striata Boiss extract. Carbohyd. Polym. 156, 340-350 (2017).
45. Berndt S, Wesarg F, Wiegand C, Kralisch D, Müller FA. Antimicrobial porous hybrids consisting of bacterial nanocellulose and silver nanoparticles. Cellulose 20(2), 771-783 (2013).
46. Khalid A, Khan R, Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Wahid F. Bacterial cellulose-zinc oxide nanocomposites as a novel dressing system for burn wounds. Carbohyd. Polym. 164, 214-221 (2017).
47. Scholz P, Müller A, Heßler N, Kralisch D, Fischer D. Freeze dried bacterial nanocellulose as potential drug-delivery system for peroral application of sensitive drugs. Presented at: CRS Local German Chapter Annual Meeting. Würzburg, Germany, 29-30 March 2012.
48. Phisalaphong M, Tran T-K, Taokaew S et al. Nata de coco industry in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia. In: Bacterial Nanocellulose-From Biotechnology to Bio-Economy. Gama M, Dourado F, Bielecki S (Eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 231-236 (2016).
49. Piazodo MES. Nata de coco industry in the Philippines. In: Bacterial Nanocellulose-From Biotechnology to Bio-Economy. Gama M, Dourado F, Bielecki S (Eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 215-229 (2016).
50. Kralisch D, Hessler N, Klemm D, Erdmann R, Schmidt W. White biotechnology for cellulose manufacturing-the HoLiR concept. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105(4), 740-747 (2010).
51. Wu SC, Li MH. Production of bacterial cellulose membranes in a modified airlift bioreactor by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 120(4), 444-449 (2015).
52. Lee KY, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A. More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: Biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber composites. Macromol. Biosci. 14(1), 10-32 (2014).
53. Zeng M, Laromaine A, Roig A. Bacterial cellulose films: Influence of bacterial strain and drying route on film properties. Cellulose 21(6), 4455-4469 (2014).
54. Qiu Y, Qiu L, Cui J, Wei Q. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-vaccarin membranes for wound healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 59, 303-309 (2016).
55. Müller A, Zink M, Hessler N et al. Bacterial nanocellulose with a shape-memory effect as potential drug-delivery system. RSC Adv. 4(100), 57173-57184 (2014).
56. Kaplan E, Ince T, Yorulmaz E, Yener F, Harputlu E, Laçin NT. Controlled delivery of ampicillin and gentamycin from cellulose hydrogels and their antibacterial efficiency. J. Biomater. Tiss. Eng. 4(7), 543-549(547) (2014).