Bacterial cellulose films: influence of bacterial strain and drying route on film properties

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 4455-4469

  Zeng, Muling ^a   Laromaine, Anna ^a   Roig, Anna ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA DE MATERIALS DE BARCELONA ICMAB CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Bacterial strain; Films; Transparent; Water adsorbent

Indexed keywords

BORON CARBIDE; CELLULOSE; DRYING; FILMS; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; POROSITY; WATER ABSORPTION;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BACTERIAL STRAINS; GLUCONACETOBACTER; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; MECHANICALLY ROBUST; SUPERCRITICAL DRYING; TRANSPARENT; WATER ABSORPTION CAPACITY;

CELLULOSE FILMS;

BACTERIA; CELLULOSE FILM; DRYING; POROSITY;

EID: 85027937494     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0408-y     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Andrade F, Alexandre N, Amorim I, Gartner F, Mauricio A, Luis AL, Gama M (2013) Studies on the biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Bioact Compat Polym 28(1):97–112
2. Andrés Barrao C, Falquet L, Calderon Copete S, Descombes P, Perez R, Ortega Pérez R, Barja F (2011) Genome sequences of the high-acetic acid-resistant bacteria Gluconacetobacter europaeus LMG 18890T and G. europaeus LMG 18494 (reference strains), G. europaeus 5P3, and Gluconacetobacter oboediens 174Bp2 (isolated from vinegar). J Bacteriol 193(10):2670–2671
3. Cameron AR, Frith JE, Cooper-White JJ (2011) The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. Biomaterials 32(26):5979–5993. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.003
4. Chin SF, Romainor ANB, Pang SC (2014) Fabrication of hydrophobic and magnetic cellulose aerogel with high oil absorption capacity. Mater Lett 115:241–243. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.061
5. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM (2007) The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8(1):1–12. doi:10.1021/bm060620d
6. Das K, Ray D, Bandyopadhyay NR, Sengupta S (2010) Study of the properties of microcrystalline cellulose particles from different renewable resources by XRD, FTIR, Nanoindentation, TGA and SEM. J Polym Environ 18(3):355–363
7. Dietrich A, Goring DAI, Revol JF (1987) Effect of mercerization on the crystallite size and crystallinity index in cellulose from different sources. Can J Chem 65(8):1724–1725
8. Dinand E, Vignon M, Chanzy H, Heux L (2002) Mercerization of primary wall cellulose and its implication for the conversion of cellulose I→ cellulose II. Cellulose 9(1):7–18. doi:10.1023/a:1015877021688
9. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D (2004) Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 86(1):617–628. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74140-5
10. French A (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4
11. Fu L, Zhang J, Yang G (2013) Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym 92(2):1432–1442. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.071
12. Gatenholm P, Klemm D (2010) Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 35(03):208–213. doi:10.1557/mrs2010.653
13. Gavillon R, Budtova T (2008) Aerocellulose: new highly porous cellulose prepared from cellulose–NaOH aqueous solutions. Biomacromolecules 9(1):269–277. doi:10.1021/bm700972k
14. George J, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Jagannath JH, Bawa AS (2005) Characterization of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) biopolymer: some thermo-mechanical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 37(4):189–194. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.10.007
15. George J, Sajeevkumar VA, Kumar R, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Bawa AS (2008) Enhancement of thermal stability associated with the chemical treatment of bacterial (Gluconacetobacter xylinus) cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 108(3):1845–1851. doi:10.1002/app.27802
16. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58(2):345–352
17. Hoepfner S, Ratke L, Milow B (2008) Synthesis and characterisation of nanofibrillar cellulose aerogels. Cellulose 15(1):121–129. doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9146-8
18. http://www.ricoh.com/about/company/technology/tech/033.html
19. Hu W, Chen S, Yang J, Li Z, Wang H (2014a) Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 101:1043–1060. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.102
20. Hu W, Chen S, Yang J, Li Z, Wang H (2014b) Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 101:1043–1060. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.102
21. Innerlohinger J, Weber HK, Kraft G (2006) Aerocellulose: aerogels and aerogel-like materials made from cellulose. Macromol Symp 244(1):126–135. doi:10.1002/masy.200651212
22. Jin H, Kettunen M, Laiho A, Pynnonen H, Paltakari J, Marmur A, Ikkala O, Ras RHA (2011) Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic nanocellulose aerogel membranes as bioinspired cargo carriers on water and oil. Langmuir 27(5):1930–1934. doi:10.1021/la103877r
23. Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I (2011) Cellulose fibers: bio- and nano-polymer composites. Green chemistry and technology. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17370-7
24. Kim D-Y, Nishiyama Y, Kuga S (2002) Surface acetylation of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 9(3–4):361–367. doi:10.1023/a:1021140726936
25. Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S (2001) Bacterial synthesized cellulose—artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 26:1561–1603
26. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44(22):3358–3393. doi:10.1002/anie.200460587
27. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466. doi:10.1002/anie.201001273
28. Liebner F, Haimer E, Wendland M, Neouze MA, Schlufter K, Miethe P, Heinze T, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2010) Aerogels from unaltered bacterial cellulose: application of scCO(2) drying for the preparation of shaped, ultra-lightweight cellulosic aerogels. Macromol Biosci 10(4):349–352. doi:10.1002/mabi.200900371
29. Ma S, Mi Q, Yu J, He J, Zhang J (2014) Aerogel materials based on cellulose. Prog Chem 26(5):796–809. doi:10.7536/pc131032
30. Mansikkamaki P, Lahtinen M, Rissanen K (2007) The conversion from cellulose I to cellulose II in NaOH mercerization performed in alcohol–water systems: an X-ray powder diffraction study. Carbohydr Polym 68(1):35–43. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.07.010
31. Moner-Girona M, Roig A, Molins E, Martinez E, Esteve J (1999) Micromechanical properties of silica aerogels. Appl Phys Lett 75(5):653–655. doi:10.1063/1.124471
32. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):3941–3994. doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b
33. Moore SW, Roca-Cusachs P, Sheetz MP (2010) Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. Dev Cell 19(2):194–206. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.018
34. Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP (2001) The determination of porosity and cellulose content of plant fibers by density methods. J Mater Sci Lett 20(23):2095–2096. doi:10.1023/a:1013703809964
35. Nata IF, Sureshkumar M, Lee C-K (2011) One-pot preparation of amine-rich magnetite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite and its application for arsenate removal. RSC Adv 1(4):625–631. doi:10.1039/c1ra00153a
36. Nimeskern L, Martínez Ávila H, Sundberg J, Gatenholm P, Müller R, Stok KS (2013) Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 22:12–21. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.005
37. Pelham RJ, Y-l Wang (1997) Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94(25):13661–13665
38. Pinto RJB, Neves MC, Neto CP, Trindade T (2012) Composites of cellulose and metal nanoparticles. In: Ebrahimi F (ed) Nanotechnology and nanomaterials, Nanocomposites - new trends and developments, InTech, September 27, 2012 under CC BY 3.0 license. doi:10.5772/50553
39. Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M (1991) Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55(1):35–58
40. Rowlands AS, George PA, Cooper-White JJ (2008) Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295(4):C1037–C1044. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.67.2008
41. Sai H, Xing L, Xiang J, Cui L, Jiao J, Zhao C, Li Z, Li F (2013) Flexible aerogels based on an interpenetrating network of bacterial cellulose and silica by a non-supercritical drying process. J Mater Chem A 1(27):7963–7970. doi:10.1039/c3ta11198a
42. Saska S, Teixeira LN, de Oliveira PT, Gaspar AMM, Ribeiro SJL, Messaddeq Y, Marchetto R (2012) Bacterial cellulose–collagen nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem 22(41):22102–22112. doi:10.1039/c2jm33762b
43. Schutz C, Sort J, Bacsik Z, Oliynyk V, Pellicer E, Fall A, Wagberg L, Berglund L, Bergstrom L, Salazar-Alvarez G (2012) Hard and transparent films formed by nanocellulose-TiO2 nanoparticle hybrids. PLoS One 7(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045828
44. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794. doi:10.1177/004051755902901003
45. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2011a) High-porosity aerogels of high specific surface area prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Compos Sci Technol 71(13):1593–1599. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.003
46. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Ikkala O, Berglund LA (2011b) Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity. Biomacromolecules 12(10):3638–3644. doi:10.1021/bm2008907
47. Shezad O, Khan S, Khan T, Park JK (2010) Physicochemical and mechanical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced with an excellent productivity in static conditions using a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Carbohydr Polym 82(1):173–180. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.052
48. Shi ZJ, Zhang Y, Phillips GO, Yang G (2014) Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll 35:539–545. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.012
49. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2(4):728–765. doi:10.3390/polym2040728
50. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3):459–494. doi:10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y
51. Sun CQ (2005) True density of microcrystal line cellulose. J Pharm Sci 94(10):2132–2134. doi:10.1002/jps.20459
52. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2005) Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26(4):419–431. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049
53. Ul-Islam M, Shah N, Ha JH, Park JK (2011) Effect of chitosan penetration on physico-chemical and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose. Korean J Chem Eng 28(8):1736–1743. doi:10.1007/s11814-011-0042-4
54. Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Park JK (2012a) Nanoreinforced bacterial cellulose–montmorillonite composites for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 89(4):1189–1197. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.093
55. Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Park JK (2012b) Water holding and release properties of bacterial cellulose obtained by in situ and ex situ modification. Carbohydr Polym 88(2):596–603. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.006
56. Ummartyotin S, Juntaro J, Sain M, Manuspiya H (2012) Development of transparent bacterial cellulose nanocomposite film as substrate for flexible organic light emitting diode (OLED) display. Ind Crop Prod 35(1):92–97. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.06.025
57. Steinbüchel A, Vandamme EJ, De Baets S, Steinbüchel A, Vandamme EJ, Hofrichter M, De Baets S (eds) (2002) Polysaccharides I: polysaccharides from prokaryotes, vol 5. Biopolymers. Wiley, University of California
58. Wada M, Sugiyama J, Okano T (1993) Native celluloses on the basis of two crystalline phase (Iα/Iβ) system. J Appl Polym Sci 49(8):1491–1496. doi:10.1002/app.1993.070490817
59. Wada M, Okano T, Sugiyama J (1997) Synchrotron-radiated X-ray and neutron diffraction study of native cellulose. Cellulose 4(3):221–232. doi:10.1023/a:1018435806488
60. Wang Y, Zhao Y, Deng Y (2008) Effect of enzymatic treatment on cotton fiber dissolution in NaOH/urea solution at cold temperature. Carbohydr Polym 72(1):178–184
61. W-h Guo, Frey MT, Burnham NA, Wang Y-l (2006) Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. Biophys J 90(6):2213–2220
62. Wicklein B, Salazar-Alvarez G (2013) Functional hybrids based on biogenic nanofibrils and inorganic nanomaterials. J Mater Chem A 1(18):5469–5478. doi:10.1039/c3ta01690k
63. Wu Z-Y, Li C, Liang H-W, Chen J-F, Yu S-H (2013a) Ultralight, flexible, and fire-resistant carbon nanofiber aerogels from bacterial cellulose. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(10):2925–2929. doi:10.1002/anie.201209676
64. Wu ZY, Li C, Liang HW, Chen JF, Yu SH (2013b) Ultralight, flexible, and fire-resistant carbon nanofiber aerogels from bacterial cellulose. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52(10):2925–2929. doi:10.1002/anie.201209676
65. Yamada Y, Hoshino K, Ishikawa T (1997) The phylogeny of acetic acid bacteria based on the partial sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA: the elevation of the subgenus Gluconoacetobacter to the generic level. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 61(8):1244–1251
66. Yano H, Sugiyama J, Nakagaito AN, Nogi M, Matsuura T, Hikita M, Handa K (2005) Optically transparent composites reinforced with networks of bacterial nanofibers. Adv Mater 17(2):153. doi:10.1002/adma.200400597
67. Zeng M, Laromaine A, Feng W, Levkin PA, Roig A (2014) Origami magnetic cellulose: controlled magnetic fraction and patterning of flexible bacterial cellulose. J Mater Chem C. doi:10.1039/c4tc00787e
68. Zhang L, Ruan D, Zhou J (2001) Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose films prepared from cotton linters in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 40(25):5923–5928