Combined dynamic predictions using joint models of two longitudinal outcomes and competing risk data

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 1787-1801

  Andrinopoulou, Eleni Rosalina ^a   Rizopoulos, D ^a   Takkenberg, Johanna J M ^a   Lesaffre, E ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b KU LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

individualized risk predictions; joint models; longitudinal data analysis; Model averaging; survival analysis

Indexed keywords

AVERAGING; CLINICAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT; MALE; MODEL; PREDICTION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; BAYES THEOREM; HEART VALVE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRANSPLANTATION;

BAYES THEOREM; FEMALE; HEART VALVES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RISK; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85027689346     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: 14770334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280215588340     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Taylor J, Yu M, Sandler H,. Individualized predictions of disease progression following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 816-825.
2. Garre F, Zwinderman A, Geskus R, et al. A joint latent class change point model to improve the prediction of time to graft failure. J R Stat Soc, Ser A 2008; 171: 299-308.
3. Yu M, Taylor J, Sandler H,. Individualized prediction in prostate cancer studies using a joint longitudinal survival-cure model. J Am Stat Assoc 2008; 103: 178-187.
4. Proust-Lima C, Taylor J,. Development and validation of a dynamic prognostic tool for prostate cancer recurrence using repeated measures of posttreatment PSA: a joint modeling approach. Biostatistics 2009; 10: 535-549.
5. Rizopoulos D,. Dynamic predictions and prospective accuracy in joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data. Biometrics 2011; 67: 819-829.
6. Bekkers J, Klieverik L, Raap G, et al. Re-operations for aortic allograft root failure: experience from a 21-year single-center prospective follow-up study. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2011; 40: 35-42.
7. Wulfsohn M, Tsiatis A,. A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. Biometrics 1997; 53: 330-339.
8. Tsiatis A, Davidian M,. Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: an overview. Statistica Sinica 2004; 14: 809-834.
9. Rizopoulos D. Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data with applications. Boca Raton: Chapman R and Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, 2012.
10. Andrinopoulou ER, Rizopoulos D, Takkenberg J, et al. Joint modeling of two longitudinal outcomes and competing risk data. Stat Med 2014; 33: 3167-3178.
11. Hoeting J, Madigan D, Raftery A, et al. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat Sci 1999; 14: 382-417.
12. Rizopoulos D, Hatfield L, Carlin B, et al. Combining dynamic predictions from joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data using Bayesian model averaging. J Am Stat Assoc 2014; 109: 1385-1397.
13. Harrell F,. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
14. Brown E,. Assessing the association between trends in a biomarker and risk of event with an application in pediatric HIV/AIDS. Ann Appl Stat 2009; 3: 1163-1182.
15. Rizopoulos D, Ghosh P,. A Bayesian semiparametric multivariate joint model for multiple longitudinal outcomes and a time-to-event. Stat Med 2011; 30: 1366-1380.
16. Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, et al. Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
17. Lesaffre E, Lawson A,. Bayesian biostatistics, New York: Wiley & Sons, 2012.
18. Jeong J, Fine J,. A note on cause-specific residual life. Biometrika 2009; 96: 237-242.
19. Gail M, Pfeiffer R,. On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk. Biostatistics 2005; 6: 227-239.
20. Schoop R, Beyersmann J, Schumacher M, et al. Quantifying the predictive accuracy of time-to-event models in the presence of competing risks. Biom J 2011; 53: 88-112.