The structural dynamics of social class

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue , 2017, Pages 55-60

  Kraus, Michael W ^a   Park, Jun Won ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

HUMANS; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 85027589305     PISSN: 2352250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.029     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Stephens, N.M., Markus, H.R., Fryberg, S.A., Social class disparities in health and education: reducing inequality by applying a sociocultural self model of behavior. Psychol Rev 119 (2012), 723–744 In this article, the authors suggest that the self is defined by an interplay between individual and structural components of social life. In the sociocultural model of the self, individuals navigate, interpret, and respond to the social world as a function of both their individual characteristics and skills and the structural conditions of their lives.
2. Kraus, M.W., Piff, P.K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M.L., Keltner, D., Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychol Rev 119 (2012), 546–572.
3. Cohen, A.B., Varnum, M.E.W., Beyond east vs. west: social class, region, and religion as forms of culture. Curr Opin Psychol 8 (2016), 5–9.
4. Destin, M., Rheinschmidt-Same, M., Richeson, J.R., Status-based identity: a conceptual framework integrating the social psychological study of socioeconomic status and identity. Perspect Psychol Sci 12 (2017), 270–289 In this article, the authors highlight the role of social identity in the experience of social class. Social identity is likely to be a particularly fruitful avenue by which to view social class because identity highlights how individual traits and beliefs are shaped by current and past relationships of individuals to the structural organization of society.
5. Durkheim, E., The Division of Labor in Society. 1933, MacMillan, New York.
6. Kraus, M.W., Tan, J.J., Americans overestimate social class mobility. J Exp Soc Psychol 58 (2015), 101–111.
7. Davidai, S., Gilovich, T., Building a more mobile America — one income quintile at a time. Perspect Psychol Sci 10 (2015), 60–71.
8. Day, M.V., Fiske, S.T., Movin’ on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 8 (2017), 267–274.
9. Shariff, A.F., Wiwad, D., Aknin, L.B., Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspect Psychol Sci 11 (2016), 373–380.
10. Gould, R.V., The origins of status hierarchies: a formal theory and empirical test. Am J Sociol 107 (2002), 1143–1178.
11. Fox, M.A., Connolly, B.A., Snyder, T.D., Youth Indicators, 2005, Trends in the Well-Being of American Youth. NCES 2005-050. 2005, US Department of Education.
12. Economic Policy Institute, State of Working America Data Library, “Compensation, Wages, and Benefits”. 2017.
13. Carnevale, A.P., Rose, S.J., Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Selective College Admissions. A Century Foundation Paper. 2003.
14. Richeson, J.A., Sommers, S.R., Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Psychol 67 (2016), 439–463 We do not have sufficient space in this review to delve into intersections between race and social class but this intersection is at the very crux of a structural understanding of social class. This is the best paper, we know of, to delve deeply into the implications of race-based economic inequality for intergroup relations. Importantly, the paper suggests that an account of race that is faithful to historical and structural causes will lead to a more informed psychological science. We apply this logic directly to studies of social class.
15. Gottfredson, L.S., Intelligence: is it the epidemiologists’ elusive “fundamental cause” of social class inequalities in health?. J Pers Soc Psychol 86 (2004), 174–199.
16. Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J.P., Fontana, M.A., Lee, J.J., Pers, T.H., Rietveld, C.A., Turley, P., Chen, G.B., Emilsson, V., Meddens, S.F.W., Oskarsson, S., Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature 533 (2016), 539–542.
17. Tucker-Drob, E.M., Bates, T.C., Large cross-national differences in gene × socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychol Sci, 27, 2016, 138 This meta-analysis is the most comprehensive evidence for the dynamic interplay between individual genes and structural contexts of social class. In particular, the cross-national comparison between the United States and countries like Australia is suggestive of the possible role that broad policies related to education and healthcare access have in the development of social class differences in individual characteristics like intelligence.
18. Powell, N.D., Sloan, E.K., Bailey, M.T., Arevalo, J.M., Miller, G.E., Chen, E., Kobor, M.S., Reader, B.F., Sheridanv J.F., Cole, S.W., Social stress up-regulates inflammatory gene expression in the leukocyte transcriptome via β-adrenergic induction of myelopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110 (2013), 16574–16579.
19. Kraus, M.W., Park, J.W., Tan, J.J.X., Signs of social class: the experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspect Psychol Sci 12 (2017), 422–435 In this paper we suggest that social class shapes many social interactions in ways that perpetuate the structural dynamics of social class. In particular, we highlight precisely how segregated society is in terms of social class, and the implications of that segregation for cooperation and resource sharing.
20. Becker, J.C., Kraus, M.W., Rheinschmidt-Same, M., Cultural expressions of social class and their implications for group-related beliefs and behaviors. J Soc Issues 73 (2017), 158–174.
21. Côté, S., Kraus, M.W., Carpenter, N.C., Piff, P.K., Beermann, U., Keltner, D., Social affiliation in same-class and cross-class interactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 146 (2017), 269–285.
22. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C., An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Soc Psychol Intergroup Relat, 33, 1979, 74.
23. Nishi, A., Shirado, H., Rand, D.G., Christakis, N.A., Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature 526 (2015), 426–429.
24. Sands, M.L., Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2017, 201615010.
25. Lipkus, I., The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personal Individ Differ 12 (1991), 1171–1178.
26. Haselton, M.G., Bryant, G.A., Wilke, A., Frederick, D.A., Galperin, A., Frankenhuis, W.E., Moore, T., Adaptive rationality: an evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Soc Cognit 27 (2009), 733–763.
27. Hackman, D.A., Farah, M.J., Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cognit Sci 13 (2009), 65–73.
28. Varnum, M.E.W., The emerging (social) neuroscience of SES. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 10 (2016), 423–430 This review provides a comprehensive examination of recent efforts to study social class differences in cognition, motivation, and perception using social neuroscience tools like fMRI and ERP. Importantly the manuscript describes interpretation challenges inherent in a biological approach to social structural differences.
29. Varnum, M.E., Blais, C., Brewer, G.A., Social class affects Mu-suppression during action observation. Soc Neurosci 11 (2016), 449–454 Social class differences that occur in the brain and body are difficult to describe without essentializing social class as located within the genetic material of individuals. This paper does a particularly excellent job of avoiding this problem in its explanations and future directions for research. The main findings indicate that Mu-suppression during action observation is stronger for those who are relatively lower than higher in socioeconomic status. The findings have direct implications for how much individuals attend to the actions of others based on their position in society.
30. Muscatell, K.A., Morelli, S.A., Falk, E.B., Way, B.M., Pfeifer, J.H., Galinsky, A.D., Lieberman, M.D., Dapretto, M., Eisenberger, N.I., Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network. Neuroimage 60 (2012), 1771–1777.
31. Snibbe, A.C., Markus, H.R., You can't always get what you want: educational attainment, agency, and choice. J Pers Soc Psychol, 88, 2005, 703.
32. Stephens, N.M., Markus, H.R., Townsend, S.S., Choice as an act of meaning: the case of social class. J Pers Soc Psychol, 93, 2007, 814.
33. Kraus, M.W., Côté, S., Keltner, D., Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychol Sci 21 (2010), 1716–1723.
34. Stellar, J.E., Manzo, V.M., Kraus, M.W., Keltner, D., Class and compassion: socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion, 12, 2012, 449.
35. Varnum, M.E., Na, J., Murata, A., Kitayama, S., Social class differences in N400 indicate differences in spontaneous trait inference. J Exp Psychol Gen 141 (2012), 518–526.
36. Kitayama, S., et al. Reduced orbitofrontal cortical volume is associated with interdependent self-construal. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2017, 201704831.
37. Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., Scarcity: The New Science of Having Less and How it Defines Our Lives. 2013, Picador, New York.
38. Callan, M.J., Ellard, J.H., Shead, N.W., Hodgins, D.C., Gambling as a search for justice: examining the role of personal relative deprivation in gambling urges and gambling behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 34 (2008), 1515–1529.
39. Kraus, M.W., Horberg, E.J., Goetz, J.L., Keltner, D., Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 37 (2011), 1376–1388.
40. Gallo, L.C., Matthews, K.A., Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: do negative emotions play a role?. Psychol Bull 129 (2003), 10–51.
41. Greitemeyer, T., Sagioglou, C., Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: a test of the theory of social deprivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 111 (2016), 178–194 The manuscript presents experimental work that manipulates the extent people are made to feel temporarily low or high in a social class hierarchy. Following this manipulation, manipulated lower social class participants were more aggressive toward a high status experiment partner relative to their manipulated higher social class counterparts.
42. Johnson, S.E., Richeson, J.A., Finkel, E.J., Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. J Pers Soc Psychol 100 (2011), 838–852.
43. Shah, A.K., Shafir, E., Mullainathan, S., Scarcity frames value. Psychol Sci 26 (2015), 402–412 In experimental work, people under conditions of scarcity focus more on pressing needs and recognize trade-offs between these needs and future goals. Under conditions of abundance people do not as easily recognize these values trade-offs.
44. Sen, M., Wasow, O., Race as a bundle of sticks: designs that estimate effects of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 19 (2016), 499–522 In this article, political scientists suggest that race is best conceptualized as a collection of related constructs or ‘bundle of sticks’ and we tend to ascribe the same logic to social class. Thus, experimental manipulations of social class merely assess the modulation of one particular correlate of social class and its resultant causal influence on downstream psychological outcomes.
45. Neville, H.J., Stevens, C., Pakulak, E., Bell, T.A., Fanning, J., Klein, S., Isbell, E., Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110 (2013), 12138–12143.
46. Farah, M.J., Betancourt, L., Shera, D.M., Savage, J.H., Giannetta, J.M., Brodsky, N.L., Malmud, E.K., Hurt, H., Environmental stimulation, parental nurturance and cognitive development in humans. Dev Sci 11 (2008), 793–801.
47. Rivera, L.A., Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. 2016, Princeton University Press In this book, the author discusses how corporations select among job applicants based on an examination of personal and social characteristics in an effort to find applicants who fit company culture. This effort has the unintended consequence of perpetuating social class inequalities in hiring and promotion.
48. Stephens, N.M., Hamedani, M.G., Destin, M., Closing the social-class achievement gap a difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychol Sci 25 (2014), 943–953.
49. Jury, M., Smeding, A., Stephens, N.M., Nelson, J., Aelenei, C., Darnon, C., The experience of low-SES students in higher education: psychological barriers to success and interventions to reduce social-class inequality. J Soc Issues 73 (2017), 16–34, 10.1111/josi.12202 This review article highlights the psychological barriers faced more by lower socioeconomic students in higher education compared to their higher SES counterparts. The manuscript does a particularly good job of highlighting how social structures create contexts that reproduce these psychological barriers along with highlighting possible ways to intervene.
50. Browman, A.S., Destin, M., The effects of a warm or chilly climate toward socioeconomic diversity on academic motivation and self-concept. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 42 (2016), 172–187.
51. Kraus, M.W., Piff, P.K., Keltner, D., Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. J Pers Soc Psychol 97 (2009), 992–1004.
52. Ryan, P., A Better Way: Our Vision for a Confident America. 2017 Retrieved from: http://abetterway.speaker.gov.