Green decoration materials selection under interior environment characteristics: A grey-correlation based hybrid MCDM method

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 81, Issue , 2018, Pages 682-692

  Tian, Guangdong ^a,c   Zhang, Honghao ^b,c   Feng, Yixiong ^d   Wang, Danqi ^a   Peng, Yong ^b   Jia, Hongfei ^a  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d NONE   (China)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Green decoration materials; Grey correlation; Interior environment characteristics; Selection; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HYBRID MATERIALS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ENVIRONMENT CHARACTERISTIC; GRAY CORRELATION; GREEN DECORATION MATERIAL; GREEN DECORATIONS; INTERIOR ENVIRONMENT CHARACTERISTIC; INTERIOR ENVIRONMENTS; SELECTION; TOPSIS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 85027546307     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.050     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Govindan, K., Shankar, K.M., Kannan, D., Sustainable material selection for construction industry–A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55 (2016), 1274–1288.
2. Deng, Y.M., Edwards, K.L., The role of materials identification and selection in engineering design. Mater Des 28 (2007), 131–139.
3. Hosseinijou, S.A., Mansour, S., Shirazi, M.A., Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:3 (2014), 620–645.
4. Ljungberg, L.Y., Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Des 28 (2007), 466–479.
5. Prendeville, S., O'Connor, F., Palmer, L., Material selection for eco-innovation: SPICE model. J Clean Prod 85 (2014), 31–40.
6. Findik, F., Turan, K., Materials selection for lighter wagon design with a weighted property index method. Mater Des 37 (2012), 470–477.
7. Bribián, I.Z., Capilla, A.V., Usón, A.A., Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46:5 (2011), 1133–1140.
8. Anand, C.K., Amor, B., Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: a critical review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67 (2017), 408–416.
9. Ashby, M.F., Materials selection in conceptual design. Mater Sci Technol 5 (1989), 517–525.
10. Sandstrom, R., Grahn, B., The assessment and evaluation of property data for materials selection purposes. Mater Des 7 (1986), 198–204.
11. Prasenjit, C., Vijay, M.A., Shankar, C., Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater Des 30 (2009), 4043–4053.
12. Ali, J., Faizal, M., Md, Y.I.S.M.S., Marjan, B., A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des 32 (2011), 1215–1221.
13. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Lu, C., Chen, Y.Z., Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41 (2015), 932–942.
14. Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitienė, I., Balezentis, A., Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 24 (2013), 181–186.
15. Cables, E., García-Cascales, M.S., Lamata, M.T., The LTOPSIS: an alternative to TOPSIS decision-making approach for linguistic variables. Expert Syst Appl 39:2 (2012), 2119–2126.
16. Xia, X., Govindan, K., Zhu, Q.H., Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J Clean Prod 87 (2015), 811–825.
17. Tian, G.D., Chu, J.W., Qiang, T., Influence factor analysis and prediction models for component removal time in manufacturing. Proc IMechE B: J Eng Manuf 227 (2013), 1533–1540.
18. Rao, R.V., Davim, J.P., A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:7–8 (2008), 751–760.
19. Desai, S., Bidanda, B., Lovell, M.R., Material and process selection in product design using decision-making technique (AHP). Eur J Ind Eng 6:3 (2012), 322–346.
20. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Zhen, L., et al. A novel hybrid multiple criteria decision making model for material selection with target-based criteria. Mater Des 60 (2014), 380–390.
21. Hsu, C.H., Wang, F.K., Tzeng, G.H., The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resour Conserv Recycl 66 (2012), 95–111.
22. Xue, Y.X., You, J.X., Lai, X.D., et al. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information. Appl Soft Comput 38 (2016), 703–713.
23. Liu, H.C., Liu, L., Wu, J., Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights. Mater Des 52 (2013), 158–167.
24. Kumar, R., Singal, S.K., Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52 (2015), 240–255.
25. Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M.Y., et al. A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des 32:3 (2011), 1215–1221.
26. Gou, Z., Lau, S.S.Y., Shen, J., Indoor environmental satisfaction in two LEED offices and its implications in green interior design. Indoor Built Environ 21:4 (2012), 503–514.
27. Gou, Z., Green building for office interiors: challenges and opportunities. Facilities 34:11/12 (2016), 614–629.
28. San-José, J.T., Garrucho, I., Losada, R., Cuadrado, J., A proposal for environmental indicators towards industrial building sustainable assessment. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14:2 (2007), 160–173.
29. Häkkinen, T., Assessment of indicators for sustainable urban construction. Civ Eng Environ Syst 24:4 (2007), 247–259.
30. Akadiri, P.O., Olomolaiye, P.O., Chinyio, E.A., Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Autom Constr 30 (2013), 113–125.
31. Shanian, A., Savadogo, O., A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making. Mater Des 27:4 (2006), 329–337.
32. Yao, H., Shen, L., Tan, Y., et al. Simulating the impacts of policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects. Autom Constr 20:8 (2011), 1060–1069.
33. Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., et al. Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry. Ecol Indic 7:3 (2007), 565–588.
34. Nieto-Morote, A., Ruz-Vila, F., A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification. Autom Constr 25 (2012), 8–19.
35. Asokan, P., Osmani, M., Price, A.D.F., Assessing the recycling potential of glass fibre reinforced plastic waste in concrete and cement composites. J Clean Prod 17:9 (2009), 821–829.
36. Bank, L.C., Thompson, B.P., McCarthy, M., Decision-making tools for evaluating the impact of materials selection on the carbon footprint of buildings. Carbon Manag 2:4 (2011), 431–441.
37. Crosbie, T., Dawood, N., Dawood, S., Improving the energy performance of the built environment: the potential of virtual collaborative life cycle tools. Autom Constr 20:2 (2011), 205–216.
38. Florez, L., Castro, D., Irizarry, J., Measuring sustainability perceptions of construction materials. Constr Innov: Inf Process Manag 13:2 (2013), 217–234.
39. Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., Dikshit, A.K., An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 9:2 (2009), 189–212.
40. Chandratilake, S.R., Dias, W.P.S., Sustainability rating systems for buildings: comparisons and correlations. Energy 59 (2013), 22–28.
41. Tsai, C.Y., Chang, A.S., Framework for developing construction sustainability items: the example of highway design. J Clean Prod 20:1 (2012), 127–136.
42. Joseph, P., Tretsiakova-McNally, S., Sustainable non-metallic building materials. Sustainability 2:2 (2010), 400–427.
43. Zhou, C.C., Yin, G.F., Hu, X.B., Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Mater Des 30:4 (2009), 1209–1215.
44. Goggins, J., Keane, T., Kelly, A., The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland. Energ Build 42:5 (2010), 735–744.
45. Kumar, R., Singal, S.K., Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52 (2015), 240–255.
46. Anojkumar, L., Ilangkumaran, M., Sasirekha, V., Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry. Expert Syst Appl 41:6 (2014), 2964–2980.
47. Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M.Y., Sapuan, S.M., Bahraminasab, M., A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des 32 (2011), 1215–1221.
48. Altuntas, S., Selim, H., Dereli, T., A fuzzy DEMATEL-based solution approach for facility layout problem: a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:5–8 (2014), 749–771.
49. Chan, J.W.K., Application of grey relational analysis for ranking material options. Int J Comput Appl Technol 26:4 (2006), 210–217.
50. Chan, J.W.K., Tong, T.K.L., Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: grey relational analysis approach. Mater Des 28 (2007), 1539–1546.
51. Rezaei, J., Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properities and a linear model. Omega-Int J Manag Sci 53 (2015), 49–57.
52. Peças, P., Ribeiro, I., Silva, A., et al. Comprehensive approach for informed life cycle-based materials selection. Mater Des 43 (2013), 220–232.
53. Peter, O.A., Paul, O.O., Ezekiel, A.C., Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Autom Constr 30 (2013), 113–125.
54. Shanian, A., Savadogo, O., A methodological concept for material selection of highly sensitive components based on multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst Appl 36 (2009), 1362–1370.
55. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Li, Z.W., et al. Fuzzy Petri nets for knowledge representation and reasoning: a literature review. Eng Appl Artif Intell 60 (2017), 45–56.
56. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Lu, C., et al. Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41 (2015), 932–942.
57. Girubha, R.J., Vinodh, S., Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Mater Des 37 (2012), 478–486.
58. Khare, S., Dell'Amico, M., Knight, C., et al. Selection of materials for high temperature latent heat energy storage. Sol Energ Mater Sol C 107 (2012), 20–27.
59. Huang, H., Zhang, L., Liu, Z., et al. Multi-criteria decision making and uncertainty analysis for materials selection in environmentally conscious design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:5–8 (2011), 421–432.
60. Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S., Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Mater Des 32:2 (2011), 851–860.
61. Wong, J.K.W., Li, H., Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Build Environ 43:1 (2008), 108–125.
62. Lo, S.M., Zhao, C.M., Liu, M., et al. A simulation model for studying the implementation of performance-based fire safety design in buildings. Autom Constr 17:7 (2008), 852–863.
63. Chen, Y., Okudan, G.E., Riley, D.R., Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Autom Constr 19:2 (2010), 235–244.
64. Kwong, C.K., Jiang, H., Luo, X.G., AI-based methodology of integrating affective design, engineering, and marketing for defining design specifications of new products. Eng Appl Artif Intell 47 (2016), 49–60.
65. Rahman, S., Odeyinka, H., Perera, S., et al. Product-cost modelling approach for the development of a decision support system for optimal roofing material selection. Expert Syst Appl 39:8 (2012), 6857–6871.
66. Kumar, R., Ray, A., Selection of material for optimal design using multi-criteria decision making. Procedia Mater Sci 6 (2014), 590–596.
67. Zhao, R., Su, H., Chen, X., et al. Commercially available materials selection in sustainable design: an integrated multi-attribute decision making approach. Sustainability, 8(1), 2016, 79.
68. Liu, M., Saman, W., Bruno, F., Review on storage materials and thermal performance enhancement techniques for high temperature phase change thermal storage systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:4 (2012), 2118–2132.
69. Kumar, R., Singal, S.K., Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52 (2015), 240–255.
70. Cárdenas, B., León, N., High temperature latent heat thermal energy storage: phase change materials, design considerations and performance enhancement techniques. Renew Sust Energy Rev 27 (2013), 724–737.
71. Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24 (1994), 19–43.
72. Tian, G.D., Chu, J.W., Hu, H.S., Li, H.L., Technology innovation system and its integrated structure for automotive components remanufacturing industry development in China. J Clean Prod 85 (2014), 419–432.
73. Dagdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., Kilinc, N., Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 36 (2009), 8143–8151.
74. Kannan, M., Jepsen, M.B., ELECTRE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 1 (2016), 1–29.
75. Kannan, M., Diabat, A., Shankar, S.M., Analyzing the drivers of green manufacturing with fuzzy approach. J Clean Prod 96 (2015), 182–193.
76. Zhu, Q.H., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.H., Supply chain-based barriers for truck-engine remanufacturing in China. Ransport Res E-Log 68 (2014), 103–117.
77. Dou, Y., Zhu, Q.H., Sarkis, J., Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology. Eur J Oper Res 233 (2014), 420–431.
78. Fu, X.Y., Zhu, Q.H., Sarkis, J., Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider. Int J Prod Econ 140 (2012), 357–367.
79. Liu, H.C., Li, P., You, J.X., Chen, Y.Z., A novel approach for FMEA: combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and gray relational analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31 (2015), 761–772.
80. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. 1981, Springer, Berlin.
81. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Shan, M.M., Shao, L.N., Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach. Soft Comput 19 (2015), 1085–1098.
82. Jiang, Z.G., Zhang, H., Sutherland, J.W., Development of multi-criteria decision making model for remanufacturing technology portfolio selection. J Clean Prod 19 (2011), 1939–1945.
83. Jiang, Z.G., Zhang, H., Yan, W., Zhou, M., Li, G.F., A method for evaluating environmental performance of machining systems. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 25 (2012), 488–495.
84. AbdelAzim, A.I., Ibrahim, A.M., Aboul-Zahab, E.M., Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using analytic hierarchy process–The case of Egypt. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71 (2017), 414–425.
85. Yu, H.P., Chen, W.S., Evaluation of interior environment characteristics of building decoration materials with analytic hierarchy process. J Build Mater 12:5 (2009), 568–574.
86. Singh, R.P., Nachtnebel, H.P., Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal. Sustain Energy Rev 55 (2016), 43–58.
87. Zhu, Q.H., Wu, N.Q., Qiao, Y., Zhou, M.C., Scheduling of single-arm multi-cluster tools with wafer residency time constraints in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 28 (2015), 117–125.
88. Tian, G.D., Zhou, Chu, J.W., A chance constrained programming approach to determine the optimal disassembly sequence. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10 (2013), 1004–1013.
89. Tian, G.D., Ke, H., Chen, X.W., Fuzzy cost-profit tradeoff model for locating a vehicle inspection station considering regional constraints. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci C 15 (2014), 1138–1146.
90. Tian, Y.H., Zhu, Q.H., Geng, Y., An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Energy Policy 56 (2013), 352–361.
91. Martinez-Rocamora, A., Solis-Guzman, J., Marrero, M., LCA databases focused on construction materials: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58 (2016), 565–573.
92. Guo, B., Geng, Y., Dong, H.J., Liu, Y.X., Energy-related greenhouse gas emission features in China's energy supply region: the case of Xinjiang. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54 (2016), 15–24.
93. Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A.R., Deng, Y., He, X.N., Kumar, P., Bansal, R.C., A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69 (2017), 596–609.
94. Zoghi, M., Ehsani, A., Sadat, M., Amiri, M., Karimi, S., Optimization solar site selection by fuzzy logic model and weighted linear combination method in arid and semi-arid region: a case study Isfahan-IRAN. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68 (2017), 986–996.
95. Aien, M., Hajebrahimi, A., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57 (2016), 1077–1089.