Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 53, Issue , 2015, Pages 49-57

  Rezaei, Jafar ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consistency ratio; Multi attribute decision making (MADM); Multi criteria decision making (MCDM); Pairwise comparison

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920277900     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Keeney R, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preference and value trade offs 1976, Wiley, New York.
2. Saaty TL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1977, 15:234-281.
3. Saaty TL. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 1986, 32:841-855.
4. Saaty TL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990, 48:9-26.
5. Saaty TL. Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process 2001, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.
6. Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey 1981, Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Hwang C-L, Lai Y-J, Liu T-Y. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers & Operations Research. 1993, 20:889-899.
8. Lai Y-J, Liu T-Y, Hwang C-L. TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research. 1994, 76:486-500.
9. Olson D. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2004, 40:721-727.
10. Yoon K. A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 1987, 38:277-286.
11. Roy B. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Riro 1968, 2:57-75.
12. Roy B. ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du CERO 1978, 20:3-24.
13. Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision 1991, 31:49-73.
14. Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004, 156:445-455.
15. Brans JP, Mareschal B., Vincke P. PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Operational research 1984, 477-490. IFORS 84, North Holland, Amsterdam. J.P. Brans (Ed.).
16. Brans JP. L'ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d'instruments d[U+05F3]aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. In: Landry RNaM, editor. L'aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d'Avenir. Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université Laval; 1982. p. 183-213.
17. Brans JP, Vincke P. Note-A preference ranking organisation method (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Management Science 1985, 31:647-656.
18. Brans J-P, Vincke P, Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research 1986, 24:228-238.
19. Xu X. The SIR method: a superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research. 2001, 131:587-602.
20. Keršuliené V, Turskis Z. Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2011, 17:645-666.
21. Toloie-Eshlaghy A, Homayonfar M, Aghaziarati M, Arbabiun P. A subjective weighting method based on group decision making for ranking and measuring criteria values. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2011, 5.
22. Jessop A. IMP: a decision aid for multiattribute evaluation using imprecise weight estimates. Omega 2014, 49:18-29.
23. Belton V. A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multi-attribute value function. European Journal of Operational Research. 1986, 26:7-21.
24. Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research. 2007, 178:514-529.
25. Triantaphyllou E. Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study 2000, Springer, US.
26. Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S. Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research. 1998, 107:507-529.
27. Wallenius J, Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Zionts S, Deb K. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science. 2008, 54:1336-1349.
28. Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 1927, 34:273.
29. Fechner GT. Elements of psychophysics. Volume 1 (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1965); translation by H.E.Adler of Elemente der Psychophysik. (Breitkopf und Hârtel, Leipzig 1860); 1860.
30. Stevens SS. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 1946, 103:677-680.
31. Stevens SS. Handbook of experimental pyschology 1951, Wiley, New York.
32. Herman MW, Koczkodaj WW. A Monte Carlo study of pairwise comparison. Information Processing Letters. 1996, 57:25-29.
33. Forman EH, Selly MA. Decision by objectives: how to convince others that you are right 2001, World Scientific Publishing Company Incorporated.
34. Karapetrovic S, Rosenbloom ES. A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 1999, 119:704-718.
35. Işklar G, Büyüközkan G. Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standards & Interfaces 2007, 29:265-274.
36. Golany B, Kress M. A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research. 1993, 69:210-220.
37. Chu ATW, Kalaba RE, Spingarn K. A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 1979, 27:531-538.
38. Saaty TL, Vargas LG. How to make a decision. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process 2012, 1-21. Springer.
39. Pérez J. Some comments on Saaty's AHP. Management Science. 1995, 41:1091-1095.
40. Belton V, Gear T. On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 1983, 11:228-230.
41. Holder RD. Some comments on the analytic hierarchy process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 1990, 41:1073-1076.
42. Johnson CR, Beine WB, Wang TJ. Right-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1979, 19:61-64.
43. Bolloju N. Aggregation of analytic hierarchy process models based on similarities in decision makers' preferences. European Journal of Operational Research. 2001, 128:499-508.
44. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
45. Von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioral research 1986, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Edwards W. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 1977, 7:326-340.
47. Edwards W, Barron FH. SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1994, 60:306-325.
48. Mustajoki J, Hämäläinen RP, Salo A. Decision support by interval SMART/SWING-incorporating imprecision in the SMART and SWING methods. Decision Sciences. 2005, 36:317-339.
49. Stewart TJ, French S, Rios J. Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning-review and extension. Omega 2013, 41:679-688.