Leveraging implementation science to improve cancer care delivery and patient outcomes

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 523-529

  Mitchell, Sandra A ^a   Chambers, David A ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; NEOPLASM; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85027437072     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2017.024729     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, et al: A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci 10:21, 2015
2. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, et al: Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. Implement Sci 10:109, 2015
3. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM: Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health 38:4-23, 2011
4. Kent EE, Mitchell SA Castro KM, et al: Cancer care delivery research: Building the evidence base to support practice change in community oncology. J Clin Oncol 33:2705-2711, 2015
5. linger JM, Hershman DL, Arnold KB, et al: Stepwise development of a cancer care delivery research study to evaluate the prevalence of virus infections in cancer patients. Future Oncol 12:1219-1231, 2016
6. Adesoye T, Greenberg CC, Neuman HB: Optimizing cancer care delivery through implementation science. Front Oncol 6:1, 2016
7. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, et al: SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf 25:986-992, 2016
8. Chubak J, Garcia MP, Burnett-Hartman AN, et al: Time to colonoscopy after positive fecal blood test in four U.S. health care systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25:344-350, 2016
9. Nadel MR, Berkowitz Z, Klabunde CN, et al: Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: Serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 25:833-839, 2010
10. Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, et al: Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:895-904, 2012
11. Printz C: HPV vaccine uptake remains low: Why some adolescents are not receiving the vaccine, and what can be done about it. Cancer 119:2947-2948, 2013
12. Zhu SH, Lee M, Zhuang YL, et al: Interventions to increase smoking cessation at the population level: How much progress has been made in the last two decades-Tob Control 21:110-118, 2012
13. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 89:1322-1327, 1999
14. Ellis PG, O'Neil BH, Earle MF, et al: Clinical pathways: Management of quality and cost in oncology networks in the metastatic colorectal cancer setting. J Oncol Pract 13:e522-e529, 2017
15. Haggstrom DA, Doebbeling BN: Quality measurement and system change of cancer care delivery. Med Care 49:S21-S27, 2011 (suppl)
16. Blayney DW, McNiff K, Eisenberg PD, et al: Development and future of the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol 32:3907-3913, 2014
17. Miller P, Mosley K: Physician reimbursement: From fee-for-service to MACRA, MIPS and APMs. J Med Pract Manage 31:266-269, 2016
18. Williams JK, Feero WG, Leonard DG, et al: Implementation science, genomic precision medicine, and improved health: A new path forward? Nurs Outlook 65:36-40, 2017
19. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK (eds): Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2012 doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.001.0001
20. Colquhoun H, Leeman J, Michie S, et al: Towards a common terminology: A simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implement Sci 9:51, 2014
21. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, et al: Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med 43:337-350, 2012
22. Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Colquhoun H, et al: A scoping review of classification schemes of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into practice in healthcare. Implement Sci 10:27, 2015
23. Mitchell SA Fisher CA, Hastings CE, et al: A thematic analysis of theoretical models fortranslational science in nursing: Mapping the field. Nurs Outlook 58:287-300, 2010
24. Nilsen P: Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci 10:53, 2015
25. Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernandez D, Fernandez-Llimos F, et al: A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health Res Policy Syst 13:16, 2015
26. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, et al: National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: Current and future directions. Am J Public Health 102:1274-1281, 2012
27. Bragge P, Grimshaw JM, Lokker C, et al: AIMD: Avalidated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. BMC Med Res Methodol 17:38, 2017
28. Brunner JW, Sankare IC, Kahn KL: Interdisciplinary priorities for dissemination, implementation, and improvement science: Frameworks, mechanics, and measures. Clin Transl Sci 8:820-823, 2015
29. Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, et al: Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health 36:24-34, 2009
30. Clinton-McHarg T, Yoong SL, Tzelepis F, et al: Psychometric properties of implementation measures for public health and community settings and mapping of constructs against the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: A systematic review. Implement Sci 11:148, 2016
31. Rabin BA, Lewis CC, Norton WE, et al: Measurement resources for dissemination and implementation research in health. Implement Sci 11:42, 2016
32. Lewis CC, Fischer S, Weiner BJ, et al: Outcomes for implementation science: An enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria. Implement Sci 10:155, 2015
33. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH: Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: A systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci 8:22, 2013
34. Martinez RG, Lewis CC, Weiner BJ: Instrumentation issues in implementation science. Implement Sci 9:118, 2014
35. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, et al: Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci 7:119, 2012
36. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al: Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 38:65-76, 2011
37. Neta G, Glasgow RE, Carpenter CR, et al: Aframework for enhancing the value of research for dissemination and implementation. Am J Public Health 105:49-57, 2015
38. Center for Research in Implementation Science and Prevention: Dissemination and Implementation Models in Health Research and Practice. http://www.dissemination-implementation.org
39. Brouwers MC, Garcia K, Makarski J, et al: The landscape of knowledge translation interventions in cancer control: What do we know and whereto next? A review of systematic reviews. Implement Sci 6:130, 2011
40. Grunfeld E, Zitzelsberger L, Evans WK, et al: Better knowledge translation for effective cancer control: A priority for action. Cancer Causes Control 15:503-510, 2004
41. Neta G, Sanchez MA, Chambers DA, et al: Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: A decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions. Implement Sci 10:4, 2015
42. Colquhoun HL, Squires JE, Kolehmainen N, et al: Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour: Asystematic review. Implement Sci 12:30, 2017
43. Grant A, Dreischulte T, Guthrie B: Process evaluation of the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) trial: Active and less active ingredients of a multi-component complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribing. Implement Sci 12:4, 2017
44. Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, et al: Achieving change in primary care - Causes of the evidence to practice gap: Systematic reviews of reviews. Implement Sci 11:40, 2016
45. May CR, Johnson M, Finch T: Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci 11:141, 2016
46. Bunce AE, Gold R, Davis JV, et al: "Salt in the wound": Safety net clinician perspectives on performance feedback derived from EHR data. J Ambul Care Manage 40:26-35, 2017
47. Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, et al: No more 'business as usual'with audit and feedback interventions: Towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci 9:14, 2014
48. Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, et al: Acompilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev 69:123-157, 2012
49. Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, et al: Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: A best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 215:453-466, 2012
50. Huisman MG, Kok M, de Bock GH, et al: Delivering tailored surgery to older cancer patients: Preoperative geriatric assessment domains and screening tools - A systematic review of systematic reviews. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1-14, 2017
51. Wozniak SE, Coleman J, Kat lic MR: Optimal preoperative evaluation and perioperative care of the geriatric patient: A surgeon's perspective. Anesthesiol Clin 33:481-489, 2015
52. Mohile SG, Velarde C, Hurria A, et al: Geriatric assessment-guided care processes for older adults: A Delphi consensus of geriatric oncology experts. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13:1120-1130, 2015
53. Knittel JG, Wildes TS: Preoperative assessment of geriatric patients. Anesthesiol Clin 34:171-183, 2016
54. Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al: International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32: 2595-2603, 2014
55. Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, Mohile S, et al: Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: An update on SIOG recommendations. Ann Oncol 26:288-300, 2015
56. VanderWalde N, Jagsi R, Dotan E, et al: NCCN Guidelines Insights: Older Adult Oncology, Version 2.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 14:1357-1370, 2016
57. Ghignone F, van Leeuwen BL, Montroni I, et al: The assessment and management of older cancer patients: ASIOG surgical task force survey on surgeons' attitudes. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:297-302, 2016
58. National Institutes of Health: Department of Health and Human Services: Part 1. Overview information. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-16-238.htm
59. Chambers D, Simpson L, Neta G, et al: Proceedings from the 9th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation. Implement Sci 12:48, 2017
60. Proctor EK, Chambers DA: Training in dissemination and implementation research: Afield-wide perspective. Transl Behav Med 10.1007/s13142-016-0406-8 [epub ahead of print on November 11, 2016]
61. Brownson RC, Jacobs JA, Tabak RG, et al: Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: Findings from a national survey in the United States. Am J Public Health 103:1693-1699, 2013
62. National Cancer Institute: Speeding Research-Tested Interventions (SPRINT). http://www.nci-sprint.com/
63. Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, et al: An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annu Rev Public Health 38:1-22, 2017
64. Chambers DA, Azrin ST: Research and services partnerships: Partnership: A fundamental component of dissemination and implementation research. Psychiatr Serv 64:509-511, 2013
65. Chambers DA, Feero WG, Khoury MJ: Convergence of implementation science, precision medicine, and the learning health care system: A new model for biomedical research. JAMA 315:1941-1942, 2016
66. Fisher ES, Shortell SM, Savitz LA: Implementation science: A potential catalyst for delivery system reform. JAMA 315:339-340, 2016
67. National Cancer Institute: Cancer Moonshot Blue Ribbon Panel. https://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/moonshot-cancer-initiative/blue-ribbon-pane