Measurement resources for dissemination and implementation research in health

Implementation Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Rabin, Borsika A ^a,b   Lewis, Cara C ^c   Norton, Wynne E ^d   Neta, Gila ^d   Chambers, David ^d   Tobin, Jonathan N ^e   Brownson, Ross C ^f,g   Glasgow, Russell E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^g USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissemination; Implementation; Measurement; Resources; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; FUNDING; HUMAN; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SCIENTIST; CONSENSUS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

CONSENSUS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84962408691     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0401-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Martinez RG, Lewis CC, Weiner BJ. Instrumentation issues in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2014;9:118.
2. Lewis CC, Stanick CF, Martinez RG, Weiner BJ, Kim M, Barwick M, Comtois KA. The society for implementation research collaboration instrument review project: a methodology to promote rigorous evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:2.
3. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22.
4. Chor KHB, Wisdom JP, Olin S-CS, Hoagwood KE, Horwitz SM. Measures for predictors of innovation adoption. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2014;1-29.
5. Glasgow RE, Riley WT. Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:237-43.
6. Lewis CC, Weiner BJ, Stanick C, Fischer S: Advancing implementation science through measure development and evaluation: study protocol. Implementation Science. 2015;10:102.
7. Neta G, Glasgow RE, Carpenter CR, Grimshaw JM, Rabin BA, Fernandez ME, Brownson RC. A framework for enhancing the value of research for dissemination and implementation. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:49-57.
8. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38:65-76.
9. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
10. Hill CE, Knox S, Thompson BJ, Williams EN, Hess SA, Ladany N. Consensual qualitative research: an update. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52:196.
11. Hesse BW. Technology-mediated social participation in health and healthcare. In: Technology mediated social participation workshop. 2010.
12. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD, Proctor EK, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE. Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci. 2012;7:119.
13. Dissemination & implementation models [ http://www.dissemination-implementation.org/ ]
14. QUERI strategic plan [ http://www.queri.research.va.gov/about/strategic_plans/default.cfm ]
15. Holt DT, Helfrich CD, Hall CG, Weiner BJ. Are you ready? How health professionals can comprehensively conceptualize readiness for change. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:50-5.
16. Weiner B, Amick H, Lee S-Y. Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;4:379-436.
17. What is the clinical-community relationships measurement framework? [ http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/resources/clinical-community-relationships-measures-atlas/ccrm-atlas3.html ]
18. Rathje, Hermann, and Bernd Hill. https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/nm/safety/safety-change-and-transitiontools-compendium-main-document-2010.pdf. 1st ed. 2016. Print.
19. AHRQ.gov [ http://primarycaremeasures.ahrq.gov/team-based-care//Home/Framework?TopicId=12 ]
20. Birken SA, Presseau J, Ellis SD, Gerstel AA, Mayer DK. Potential determinants of health-care professionals' use of survivorship care plans: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2014;9.
21. About us-CIHR [http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html]