Outcomes for implementation science: An enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria

Implementation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Lewis, Cara C ^a,b   Fischer, Sarah ^a   Weiner, Bryan J ^c   Stanick, Cameo ^d   Kim, Mimi ^c,e   Martinez, Ruben G ^f  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissemination; Evidence based assessment; Implementation; Instruments; Psychometrics; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84953637581     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0342-x     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Martinez RG, Lewis CC, Weiner BJ. Instrumentation issues in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2014;9:118.
2. Weiner B, Amick H, Lee S-Y. Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Med Care Res Rev. 2008
3. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22.
4. Chor KHB, Wisdom JP, Olin S-CS, Hoagwood KE, Horwitz SM. Measures for Predictors of Innovation Adoption. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2015;42:545-73.
5. Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2009;36:24-34.
6. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38:65-76.
7. Lewis CC, Stanick CF, Martinez RG, Weiner BJ, Kim M, Barwick M, et al. The society for implementation research collaboration instrument review project: a methodology to promote rigorous evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:2.
8. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C, et al. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S14-20.
9. Hunsley J, Mash EJ. Evidence-based assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:29-51.
10. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42.
11. Muse K, McManus F. A systematic review of methods for assessing competence in cognitive-behavioural therapy. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:484-99.
12. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651-7.
13. Goodman RM, McLeroy KR, Steckler AB, Hoyle RH. Development of level of institutionalization scales for health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav. 1993;20:161-78.
14. Yetter G. Assessing the acceptability of problem-solving procedures by school teams: preliminary development of the pre-referral intervention team inventory. J Educ Psychol Consult. 2010;20:139-68.
15. Addis ME, Krasnow AD. A national survey of practicing psychologists' attitudes toward psychotherapy treatment manuals. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:331.
16. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2:192-222.
17. Champion VL, Leach A. Variables related to research utilization in nursing: an empirical investigation. J Adv Nurs. 1989;14:705-10.
18. Whittingham K, Sofronoff K, Sheffield JK. Stepping Stones Triple P: a pilot study to evaluate acceptability of the program by parents of a child diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2006;27:364-80.
19. French MT, Bradley CJ, Calingaert B, Dennis ML, Karuntzos GT. Cost analysis of training and employment services in methadone treatment. Evol Program Plan. 1994;17:107-20.
20. Kashner TM, Rush AJ, Altshuler KZ. Measuring costs of guideline-driven mental health care: the Texas Medication Algorithm Project. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1999;2:111-21.
21. Trent LR. Development of a Measure of Disseminability (MOD). University of Mississippi; 2010.
22. McIntosh K, MacKay LD, Hume AE, Doolittle J, Vincent CG, Horner RH, Ervin RA. Development and initial validation of a measure to assess factors related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavior support. J Posit Behav Interv. 2011;13(4):208-18.
23. Glasgow RE, Riley WT. Pragmatic measures: What they are and why we need them. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:237-43.
24. Jensen-Doss A, Hawley KM. Understanding barriers to evidence-based assessment: clinician attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010;39:885-96.
25. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD, Proctor EK, et al. Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci. 2012;7:119.
26. Haynes SN, Mumma GH, Pinson C. Idiographic assessment: Conceptual and psychometric foundations of individualized behavioral assessment. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:179-91.
27. Wisdom JP, Chor KHB, Hoagwood KE, Horwitz SM. Innovation adoption: a review of theories and constructs. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2014;41:480-502.