Intraoperative 3D Computed Tomography: Spine Surgery

Neurosurgery Clinics of North America

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 585-594

  Adamczak, Stephanie E ^a   Bova, Frank J ^a   Hoh, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

3D navigation; 3D printing; Pedicle screws; Spinal fusion; Stealth

Indexed keywords

CHILD HEALTH CARE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEURONAVIGATION; NEUROSURGERY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RESIDENT; REVIEW; SPINE FUSION; SPINE STABILIZATION; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SPINE; SURGERY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; SPINE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 85027227796     PISSN: 10423680     EISSN: 15581349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.06.002     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Merloz, P., Tonetti, J., Pittet, L., et al. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Comput Aided Surg 3:6 (1998), 297–305.
2. Khanna, A.R., Yanamadala, V., Coumans, J.V., Effect of intraoperative navigation on operative time in 1-level lumbar fusion surgery. J Clin Neurosci 32 (2016), 72–76.
3. Verma, S.K., Singh, P.K., Agrawal, D., et al. O-arm with navigation versus C-arm: a review of screw placement over 3 years at a major trauma center. Br J Neurosurg 30:6 (2016), 658–661.
4. Noriega, D.C., Hernández-Ramajo, R., Rodríguez-Monsalve Milano, F., et al. Risk-benefit analysis of navigation techniques for vertebral transpedicular instrumentation: a prospective study. Spine J 17:1 (2017), 70–75.
5. Heary, R.F., Bono, C.M., Black, M., Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment. J Neurosurg 100:4 Suppl Spine (2004), 325–331.
6. Uehara, M., Takahashi, J., Ikegami, S., et al. Screw perforation rates in 359 consecutive patients receiving computer-guided pedicle screw insertion along the cervical to lumbar spine. Eur Spine J, 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
7. Joseph, J.R., Smith, B.W., Patel, R.D., et al. Use of 3D CT-based navigation in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 25:3 (2016), 339–344.
8. Pisapia, J.M., Nayak, N.R., Salinas, R.D., et al. Navigated odontoid screw placement using the O-arm: technical note and case series. J Neurosurg Spine 26:1 (2017), 10–18.
9. Gallie, W., Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg 46:3 (1939), 495–499.
10. Brooks, A.L., Jenkins, E.B., Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:3 (1978), 279–284.
11. Dickman, C.A., Sonntag, V.K., Papadopoulos, S.M., et al. The interspinous method of posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis. J Neurosurg 74:2 (1991), 190–198.
12. Magerl, F., Seemann, P., Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation in cervical spine. Kehr, I., Weidner, A., (eds.) Cervical spine, 1986, Springer, Berlin, 322–327.
13. Paramore, C.G., Dickman, C.A., Sonntag, V.K., The anatomical suitability of the C1-2 complex for transarticular screw fixation. J Neurosurg 85:2 (1996), 221–224.
14. Bloch, O., Holly, L.T., Park, J., et al. Effect of frameless stereotaxy on the accuracy of C1-2 transarticular screw placement. J Neurosurg 95:1 Suppl (2001), 74–79.
15. Yang, Y., Wang, F., Han, S., et al. Isocentric C-arm three-dimensional navigation versus conventional C-arm assisted C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:8 (2015), 1083–1092.
16. Harms, J., Melcher, R.P., Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:22 (2001), 2467–2471.
17. Yang, Y.L., Zhou, D.S., He, J.L., Comparison of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement for atlantoaxial instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:3 (2013), 127–134.
18. Larson, A.N., Santos, E.R., Polly, D.W., et al. Pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography and 3-dimensional image-guided navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:3 (2012), E188–E194.
19. Ledonio, C.G., Polly, D.W., Vitale, M.G., et al. Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety: a systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America task force. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:13 (2011), 1227–1234.
20. Liu, Z., Jin, M., Qiu, Y., et al. The superiority of intraoperative O-arm navigation-assisted surgery in instrumenting extremely small thoracic pedicles of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore), 95(18), 2016, e3581.
21. Mobbs, R.J., Phan, K., Malham, G., et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1:1 (2015), 2–18.
22. Hu, W., Tang, J., Wu, X., et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications. Int Orthop 40:9 (2016), 1883–1890.
23. Houten, J.K., Nasser, R., Baxi, N., Clinical assessment of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the O-arm multidimensional surgical imaging system. Neurosurgery 70:4 (2012), 990–995.
24. Wood, M., Mannion, R., A comparison of CT-based navigation techniques for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:1 (2011), E1–E5.
25. Kraus, M.D., Krischak, G., Keppler, P., et al. Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:9 (2010), 2419–2429.
26. Villard, J., Ryang, Y.M., Demetriades, A.K., et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:13 (2014), 1004–1009.
27. Costa, F., Tosi, G., Attuati, L., et al. Radiation exposure in spine surgery using an image-guided system based on intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography: analysis of 107 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine 25:5 (2016), 654–659.
28. Su, A.W., Luo, T.D., McIntosh, A.L., et al. Switching to a pediatric dose O-arm protocol in spine surgery significantly reduced patient radiation exposure. J Pediatr Orthop 36:6 (2016), 621–626.
29. Fu, M., Lin, L., Kong, X., et al. Construction and accuracy assessment of patient-specific biocompatible drill template for cervical anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) insertion: an in vitro study. PLoS One, 8(1), 2013, e53580.
30. Sugawara, T., Higashiyama, N., Kaneyama, S., et al. Multistep pedicle screw insertion procedure with patient-specific lamina fit-and-lock templates for the thoracic spine: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:2 (2013), 185–190.
31. Kaneyama, S., Sugawara, T., Sumi, M., Safe and accurate midcervical pedicle screw insertion procedure with the patient-specific screw guide template system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:6 (2015), E341–E348.
32. Sugawara, T., Higashiyama, N., Kaneyama, S., et al. Accurate and simple screw insertion procedure with patient-specific screw guide templates for posterior C1-C2 fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:6 (2017), E340–E346.
33. Chen, H., Wu, D., Yang, H., et al. Clinical use of 3D printing guide plate in posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. Med Sci Monit 21 (2015), 3948–3954.
34. Rosenzweig, D.H., Carelli, E., Steffen, T., et al. 3D-printed ABS and PLA scaffolds for cartilage and nucleus pulposus tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 16:7 (2015), 15118–15135.
35. Knutsen, A.R., Borkowski, S.L., Ebramzadeh, E., et al. Static and dynamic fatigue behavior of topology designed and conventional 3D printed bioresorbable PCL cervical interbody fusion devices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 49 (2015), 332–342.
36. Spetzger, U., Frasca, M., König, S.A., Surgical planning, manufacturing and implantation of an individualized cervical fusion titanium cage using patient-specific data. Eur Spine J 25:7 (2016), 2239–2246.
37. Xu, N., Wei, F., Liu, X., et al. Reconstruction of the upper cervical spine using a personalized 3D-printed vertebral body in an adolescent with Ewing sarcoma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1 (2016), E50–E54.
38. News C. 3D-printed-vertebra-used-in-spine-surgery.
39. Rehder, R., Abd-El-Barr, M., Hooten, K., et al. The role of simulation in neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 32:1 (2016), 43–54.
40. Goel, A., Jankharia, B., Shah, A., et al. Three-dimensional models: an emerging investigational revolution for craniovertebral junction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 25:6 (2016), 740–744.
41. Xiao, J.R., Huang, W.D., Yang, X.H., et al. En bloc resection of primary malignant bone tumor in the cervical spine based on 3-dimensional printing technology. Orthop Surg 8:2 (2016), 171–178.
42. Li, C., Yang, M., Xie, Y., et al. Application of the polystyrene model made by 3-D printing rapid prototyping technology for operation planning in revision lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Sci 20:3 (2015), 475–480.
43. Liew, Y., Beveridge, E., Demetriades, A.K., et al. 3D printing of patient-specific anatomy: a tool to improve patient consent and enhance imaging interpretation by trainees. Br J Neurosurg 29:5 (2015), 712–714.