Surgical planning, manufacturing and implantation of an individualized cervical fusion titanium cage using patient-specific data

European Spine Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 2239-2246

  Spetzger, Uwe ^a   Frasca, Miles ^b   König, Stefan Alexander ^a  

^a Klinikum Karlsruhe   (Germany)

^b 3D Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

3D modeling; Cervical spine; Computer aided design; Fusion; Manufacturing; Patient data; Titanium cage

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DECOMPRESSION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LASER; OSTEOPHYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SPINE FUSION; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TITANIUM CAGE; TREATMENT PLANNING; ANATOMIC MODEL; BONE PLATE; CERVICAL VERTEBRA; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WEIGHT BEARING;

BONE PLATES; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OSTEOPHYTE; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPINAL FUSION; TITANIUM; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84959343234     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4473-9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Yamagata T, Takami T, Uda T, Ikeda H, Nagata T, Sakamoto S, Tsuyuguchi N, Ohata K (2012) Outcomes of contemporary use of rectangular titanium stand-alone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: cage subsidence and cervical alignment. J Clin Neurosci 19(12):1673–1678
2. Cabraja M, Oezdemir S, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S (2012) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:172
3. Wu WJ, Jiang LS, Liang Y, Dai LY (2012) Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 21(7):1374–1382
4. Kolstad F, Nygaard ØP, Andresen H, Leivseth G (2010) Anterior cervical arthrodesis using a “stand alone” cylindric titanium cage: prospective analysis of radiographic parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(16):1545–1550
5. Aitasalo KM, Piitulainen JM, Rekola J, Vallittu PK (2014) Craniofacial bone reconstruction with bioactive fiber-reinforced composite implant. Head Neck 36(5):722–728
6. Rotaru H, Stan H, Florian IS, Schumacher R, Park YT, Kim SG, Chezan H, Balc N, Baciut M (2012) Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(2):e169–e176
7. Cabraja M, Klein M, Lehmann TN (2009) Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects. Neurosurg Focus 26(6):E10
8. Origitano TC, Izquierdo R, Scannicchio LB (1995) Reconstructing complex cranial defects with a preformed cranial prosthesis. Skull Base Surg 5(2):109–116
9. Skeppholm M, Svedmark P, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Olivecrona H, Olerud C (2015) Evaluation of mobility and stability in the Discover artificial disc: an in vivo motion study using high-accuracy 3D CT data. J Neurosurg Spine 23(3):383–389
10. Lee CH, Kim KJ, Hyun SJ, Yeom JS, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2015) Subsidence as of 12 months after single-level anterior cervical inter-body fusion. Is it related to clinical outcomes? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157(6):1063–1068
11. Brenke C, Dostal M, Scharf J, Weiß C, Schmieder K, Barth M (2014) Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3725-9