A comparison of CT-based navigation techniques for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Wood, Martin ^a   Mannion, Richard ^a,b  

^a PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

image guided surgery; intraoperative 3 dimensional fluoroscopy; lumbar pedicle screw placement; minimally invasive lumbar fusion; minimally invasive spinal surgery; surgical accuracy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PEDICLE SCREW; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL FUSION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79951676298     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181d534b8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Foley K, Gupta S. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(1 suppl):7-12. (Pubitemid 34686594)
2. Foley K, Holly L, Schwender J. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine. 2003;28:S26-S35. (Pubitemid 36959580)
3. Kim C, Lee Y, Taylor W, et al. Use of navigation-assisted fluoro-scopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine J. 2008;8:584-590. (Pubitemid 351893122)
4. Amiot L, Lang K, Putzier M, et al. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. Spine. 2002;25:606-614. (Pubitemid 30158220)
5. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Makitalo K, et al. Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery: a prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine. 1997;22:1254-1258. (Pubitemid 27259842)
6. Lee T, Yang L, Liliang P, et al. Single versus separate registration for computer-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement. Spine. 2004; 29:1585-1589. (Pubitemid 38943846)
7. Nakashima H, Sato K, Ando T, et al. Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoro-scopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoro-scopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:468-472.
8. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Utility ofcom-puterized isocentric fluoroscopy for minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques. J SpinalDisord Tech. 2005;18:369-375. (Pubitemid 44378156)
9. Nowitzke A, Wood M, Cooney K. Improving accuracy and reduc-ing errors in spinal surgery-a new technique for thoracolumbar level localization using computer assisted image guidance. Spine J. 2007; 8:597-604.
10. Rampersaud Y, Pik J, Salonen D, et al. Clinical accuracy of fluoro-scopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: a CT analysis. Spine. 2005;30:E183-E190.
11. Bindal RK, Glaze S, Ognoskie M, et al. Surgeon and patient radia-tion exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion. Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9:570-573.
12. Smith H, Welsch M, Sasso R, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted image-guidance with intraoperative three-dimen-sional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:532-537.
13. Lekovic G, Potts E, Karahalios D, et al. A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of27 patients and 277 pedicle screws. J Neuro-surg Spine. 2007;7:393-398. (Pubitemid 47584614)
14. Nottmeier E, Seemer W, Young P. Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using three-dimensional image guidance: experience in a large patient cohort. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:33-39.
15. Sasso R, Garrido B. Computer-assisted spinal navigation versus serial radiography and operative time for posterior spinal fusion at L5-S1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:118-122. (Pubitemid 46588321)
16. Bindal R, Ghosh S. Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:126-132. (Pubitemid 47066055)
17. Bose B, Wierzbowski L, Sestokas A. Neurophysiologic monitoring of spinal nerve root function during instrumented posterior lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2002;27:1444-1450. (Pubitemid 34747835)
18. Calancie B, Madsen P, Lebwohl N. Stimulus-evoked EMG monitoring during transpedicular lumbosacral spine instrumenta-tion: Initial clinical results. Spine. 1994;19:2780-2785.
19. Ozgur BM, Berta S, Khiatani V, et al. Automated intraoperative EMG testing during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Spine J. 2006;6:708-713. (Pubitemid 44752631)
20. Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition: analysis of4857 screws. Spine. 2007;32:2673-2678. (Pubitemid 350135378)
21. Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Kim Y, et al. Can triggered electromyo-graph thresholds predict safe thoracic pedicle screw placement? Spine. 2002;27:2030-2035.
22. Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placementinlumbarvertebrae. Spine. 1996;21:1320-1324.
23. Gertzbein S, Robbins S. Accuracy ofpedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine. 1990;15:11-14. (Pubitemid 20102491)
24. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:613-617. (Pubitemid 46763994)