Static and dynamic fatigue behavior of topology designed and conventional 3D printed bioresorbable PCL cervical interbody fusion devices

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 332-342

  Knutsen, Ashleen R ^a,b   Borkowski, Sean L ^a,b   Ebramzadeh, Edward ^a,b   Flanagan, Colleen L ^c   Hollister, Scott J ^c,d   Sangiorgio, Sophia N ^a,b  

^a J Vernon Luck   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

ASTM testing; Bioresorbable cages; Fatigue properties; Interbody fusion; Spine fusion; Structural properties

Indexed keywords

3D PRINTERS; ANCHORAGES (FOUNDATIONS); MATERIALS TESTING; STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES; TOPOLOGY; TORSIONAL STRESS;

BIORESORBABLE; BIORESORBABLE MATERIALS; CERVICAL INTERBODY FUSION DEVICES; COMPRESSIVE FAILURE; FATIGUE PROPERTIES; INTERBODY FUSION; PHYSIOLOGICAL RANGE; SPINE FUSION;

STANDARDS;

BIOMATERIAL; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYESTER;

ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; DYNAMICS; FORCE; GEOMETRY; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE; MECHANICAL TORSION; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SPINE FUSION; STANDARD; THICKNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; YOUNG MODULUS; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; CERVICAL VERTEBRA; DEVICES; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGERY; WEIGHT BEARING;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; POLYESTERS; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPINAL FUSION; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84930936827     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ASTM F2077-11, 2011. Test Methods for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices.
2. Brenke C., Pott P., Schwarz M.L., Schmieder K., Barth M. Development of a low-cost polymethylmethacrylate stand-alone cervical cage: technical note. J. Neurol. Surg. A Cent. Eur. Neurosurg. 2013, 75:317-322.
3. Cabraja M., Oezdemir S., Koeppen D., Kroppenstedt S. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012, 13:172.
4. Chen Y., Wang X., Lu X., Yang L., Yang H., Yuan W., et al. Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up. Eur. Spine J. 2013, 22:1539-1546.
5. Claes L.E. Mechanical characterization of biodegradable implants. Clin. Mater. 1992, 10:41-46.
6. U.S.Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device 2007, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington DC.
7. Coelho P.G., Fernandes P.R., Rodrigues H.C., Cardoso J.B., Guedes J.M. Numerical modeling of bone tissue adaptation--a hierarchical approach for bone apparent density and trabecular structure. J. Biomech. 2009, 42:830-837.
8. Engels T.A., Sontjens S.H., Smit T.H., Govaert L.E. Time-dependent failure of amorphous polylactides in static loading conditions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010, 21:89-97.
9. Eshraghi S., Das S. Mechanical and microstructural properties of polycaprolactone scaffolds with one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional orthogonally oriented porous architectures produced by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:2467-2476.
10. Gloria A., Manto L., De Santis R., Ambrosio L. Biomechanical behavior of a novel composite intervertebral body fusion device. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 2008, 6:163-169.
11. Greene D.L., Crawford N.R., Chamberlain R.H., Park S.C., Crandall D. Biomechanical comparison of cervical interbody cage versus structural bone graft. Spine J. 2003, 3:262-269.
12. Hacker R.J., Cauthen J.C., Gilbert T.J., Griffith S.L. A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25:2646-2654.
13. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), 2011. HCUP Databases: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
14. Jarman-Smith M., Brady M., Kurtz S.M., Cordaro N.M., Walsh W.R. Porosity in polyaryletheretherketone. PEEK Biomaterials Handbook 2012, 298. Elsevier, Waltham. 1st ed. S.M. Kurtz (Ed.).
15. Kanayama M., Cunningham B.W., Haggerty C.J., Abumi K., Kaneda K., McAfee P.C. In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices. J. Neurosurg. 2000, 93:259-265.
16. Kandziora F., Pflugmacher R., Schafer J., Born C., Duda G., Haas N.P., et al. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001, 26:1850-1857.
17. Kang H., Lin C.Y., Hollister S.J. Topology optimization of three dimensional tissue engineering scaffold architectures for prescribed bulk modulus and diffusivity. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2010, 42:633-644.
18. Kang H., Hollister S.J., La Marca F., Park P., Lin C.Y. Porous biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and fabrication using integrated global-local topology optimization with laser sintering. J. Biomech. Eng. 2013, 135:101013-101018.
19. Kroeze R.J., Helder M.N., Govaert L.E., Smit T.H. Biodegradable polymers in bone tissue engineering. Materials 2009, 2:833-856.
20. Lohfeld S., Cahill S., Barron V., McHugh P., Durselen L., Kreja L., et al. Fabrication, mechanical and in vivo performance of polycaprolactone/tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8:3446-3456.
21. Majd M.E., Vadhva M., Holt R.T. Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999, 24:1604-1610.
22. Miller L.E., Block J.E. Safety and effectiveness of bone allografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011, 36:2045-2050.
23. Moreland D.B., Asch H.L., Clabeaux D.E., Castiglia G.J., Czajka G.A., Lewis P.J., et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft. Spine J. 2004, 4:184-191.
24. Moroney S.P., Schultz A.B., Miller J.A. Analysis and measurement of neck loads. J. Orthop. Res. 1988, 6:713-720.
25. Partee B., Hollister S.J., Das S. Selective laser sintering process optimization for layered manufacturing of CAPA 6501 polycaprolactone bone tissue engineering scaffolds. ASME J Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2006, 128:531-540.
26. Przybyla A.S., Skrzypiec D., Pollintine P., Dolan P., Adams M.A. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:1612-1620.
27. Shikinami Y., Okuno M. Mechanical evaluation of novel spinal interbody fusion cages made of bioactive, resorbable composites. Biomaterials 2003, 24:3161-3170.
28. Smit T.H., Thomas K.A., Hoogendoorn R.J., Strijkers G.J., Helder M.N., Wuisman P.I. Sterilization and strength of 70/30 polylactide cages: e-beam versus ethylene oxide. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:742-747.
29. Smit T.H., Engels T.A., Wuisman P.I., Govaert L.E. Time-dependent mechanical strength of 70/30 Poly(L, DL-lactide): shedding light on the premature failure of degradable spinal cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33:14-18.
30. Thomas K.A., Toth J.M., Crawford N.R., Seim H.B., Shi L.L., Harris M.B., et al. Bioresorbable polylactide interbody implants in an ovine anterior cervical discectomy and fusion model: three-year results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33:734-742.
31. Timmer M.D., Carter C., Ambrose C.G., Mikos A.G. Fabrication of poly(propylene fumarate)-based orthopaedic implants by photo-crosslinking through transparent silicone molds. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4707-4714.
32. Truumees E., Demetropoulos C.K., Yang K.H., Herkowitz H.N. Failure of human cervical endplates: a cadaveric experimental model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003, 28:2204-2208.
33. Vavruch L., Hedlund R., Javid D., Leszniewski W., Shalabi A. A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002, 27:1694-1701.
34. Weiner B.K., Fraser R.D. Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998, 23:634-640.
35. White A.A., Panjabi M.M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine 1990, J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia. 2nd ed.
36. Williams J.M., Adewunmi A., Schek R.M., Flanagan C.L., Krebsbach P.H., Feinberg S.E., et al. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 2005, 26:4817-4827.
37. Zhu Y., Li F., Li S., Hao Y., Yang R. Effect of elastic modulus on biomechanical properties of lumbar interbody fusion cage. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2009, 25:325-328.