Interspecific Plastome Recombination Reflects Ancient Reticulate Evolution in Picea (Pinaceae)

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 1689-1701

  Sullivan, Alexis R ^a   Schiffthaler, Bastian ^a   Thompson, Stacey Lee ^a,b   Street, Nathaniel R ^a   Wang, Xiao Ru ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

chloroplast genomes; hybridization; phylogenetic incongruence; recombination; reticulate evolution

Indexed keywords

ABIES; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CHLOROPLAST GENOME; CLADISTICS; FOREST; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INHERITANCE; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; NORWAY SPRUCE; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT GENE; PLASTID GENOME; PROCEDURES; SPRUCE;

PLANT DNA;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE TRANSFER, HORIZONTAL; GENES, PLANT; GENOME, PLASTID; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PICEA; PLASTIDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 85027145829     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/MOLBEV/MSX111     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Aberer AJ, Pattengale ND, Stamatakis A. 2010. Parallelized phylogenetic post-analysis on multi-core architectures. J Comput Sci. 1:107–114.
2. Aizawa M, Yoshimaru H, Saito H, Katsuki T, Kawahara T, Kitamura K, Shi F, Kaji M. 2007. Phylogeography of a northeast Asian spruce, Picea jezoensis, inferred from genetic variation observed in organelle DNA markers. Mol Ecol. 16:3393–3405.
3. Bankevich A, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19:455–477.
4. Barnard-Kubow KB, McCoy MA, Galloway LF. 2017. Biparental chloroplast inheritance leads to rescue from cytonuclear incompatibility. New Phytol. 213:1466–1476.
5. Beiko RG, Hamilton N. 2006. Phylogenetic identification of lateral genetic transfer events. BMC Evol Biol. 6:15–17.
6. Bock R. 2007. Structure, function, and inheritance of plastid genomes. In: Bock, R, editor. Cell and molecular biology of plastids. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 29–63.
7. Boni MF, Posada D, Feldman MW. 2007. An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics 176:1035–1047.
8. Bouillé M, Senneville S, Bousquet J. 2011. Discordant mtDNA and cpDNA phylogenies indicate geographic speciation and reticulation as driving factors for the diversification of the genus Picea. Tree Gene Genomes 7:469–484.
9. Bryant D, Tsang J, Jearney PE, Li M. 2000. Computing the quartet distance between evolutionary trees. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. New York City: ACM Press. p. 285–286.
10. Carbonell-Caballero J, Alonso R, Ibañez V, Terol J, Talon M, Dopazo J. 2015. A phylogenetic analysis of 34 chloroplast genomes elucidates the relationships between wild and domestic species within the genus Citrus. Mol Biol Evol. 32:2015–2035.
11. Corriveau JL, Coleman AW. 1988. Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperms. Am J Bot. 75:1443–1458.
12. D’Alelio D, Ruggiero MV. 2015. Interspecific plastidial recombination in the diatom genus Pseudo-nitzschia. J Phycol. 51:1024–1028.
13. Day A, Madesis P. 2007. DNA replication, recombination, and repair in plastids. In: Bock R, editor. Cell and molecular biology of plastids. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 65–119.
14. de Vries J, Sousa FL, Bölter B, Soll J, Gould SB. 2015. YCF1: a green TIC?. Plant Cell 27:1827–1833.
15. DongW,XuC,LiC,SunJ,ZuoY,ShiS,ChengT,GuoJ,ZhouS.2015.ycf1, the most promising plastid DNA barcode of land plants. Sci Rep. 5:8348.
16. Doorduin L, Gravendeel B, Lammers Y, Ariyurek Y, Chin-A-Woeng T, Vrieling K. 2011. The complete chloroplast genome of 17 individuals of pest species Jacobaea vulgaris: SNPs, microsatellites and barcoding markers for population and phylogenetic studies. DNA Res. 28:93–105.
17. Doyle JJ. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst Bot. 17:144–163.
18. Du FK, Peng XL, Liu JQ, Lascoux M, Hu FS, Petit RJ. 2011. Direction and extent of organelle DNA introgression between two spruce species in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. New Phytol. 192:1024–1033.
19. Eckenwalder JE. 2009. Conifers of the world: the complete reference. Portland (OR): Timber Press, Inc.
20. Ellis JR, Bentley KE, McCauley DE. 2008. Detection of rare paternal chloroplast inheritance in controlled crosses of the endangered sunflower Helianthus verticillatus. Heredity 100:574–580.
21. Ellstrand NC, Whitkus R, Rieseberg LH. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93:5090–5093.
22. Erixon P, Oxelman B. 2008. Reticulate or tree-like chloroplast DNA evolution in Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae)?. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 48:313–325.
23. Excoffier L, Ray N. 2008. Surfing during population expansions promotes genetic revolutions and structuration. Trends Ecol Evol. 23:347–351.
24. Farjon A. 1991. Pinaceae: drawings and descriptions of the genera: Abies, Cedrus, Pseudolarix, Keteleeria, Nothotsuga, Tsuga, Cathaya, Pseudotsuga, Larix and Picea. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.
25. Fay MP, Shaw PA. 2010. Exact and asymptotic weighted logrank tests for interval censored data: the interval R package. J Stat Softw. 36:1–34.
26. Felsenstein J. 1974. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78:737–765.
27. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 11:725–736.
28. Hamilton JA, Aitken SN. 2013. Genetic and morphological structure of a spruce hybrid (Picea sitchensisx P. glauca) zone along a climatic gradient. Am J Bot. 100:1651–1662.
29. Hansen AK, Escobar LK, Gilbert LE, Jansen RK. 2007. Paternal, maternal, and biparental inheritance of the chloroplast genome in Passiflora (Passifloraceae): implications for phylogenetic studies. Am J Bot. 94:42–46.
30. Hu S, Sablok G, Wang B, Qu D, Barbaro E, Viola R, Li M, Varotto C. 2015. Plastome organization and evolution of chloroplast genes in Cardamine species adapted to contrasting habitats. BMC Genomics 16:306.
31. Huang S, Chiang YC, Schaal BA, Chou CH, Chiang TY. 2001. Organelle DNA phylogeography of Cycas taitungensis, a relict species in Taiwan. Mol Ecol. 10:2669–2681.
32. Jackman SD, et al. 2015. Organellar genomes of white spruce (Picea glauca): assembly and annotation. Genome Biol Evol. 8:29–41.
33. Jaramillo-Correa JP, Bousquet J. 2005. Mitochondrial genome recombination in the zone of contact between two hybridizing conifers. Genetics 171:1951–1962.
34. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772–780.
35. Kawata M, Harada T, Shimamoto Y, Oono K, Takaiwa F. 1997. Short inverted repeats function as hotspots of intermolecular recombination giving rise to oligomers of deleted plastid DNAs (ptDNAs). Curr Genet. 31:179–184.
36. Kikuchi S, Bédard J, Hirano M, Hirabayashi Y, Oishi M, Imai M, Takase M, Ide T, Nakai M. 2013. Uncovering the protein translocon at the chloroplast inner envelope membrane. Science 339:571–574.
37. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Klymiuk AA, Stockey RA. 2012. A lower Cretaceous (Valanginian) seed cone provides the earliest fossil record for Picea (Pinaceae). Am J Bot. 99:1069–1082.
39. Krzywinski MI, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. 2009. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19:1639–1645.
40. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12.
41. Lan T, Wang XR, Zeng QY. 2013. Structural and functional evolution of positively selected sites in pine glutathione S-transferase enzyme family. J Biol Chem. 288:24441–24451.
42. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S. 2012. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1695–1701.
43. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Kainer D, Mayer C, Stamatakis A. 2014. Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets. BMC Evol Biol. 14:82.
44. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359.
45. Lemey P, Lott M, Martin DP, Moulton V. 2009. Identifying recombinants in human and primate immunodeficiency virus sequence alignments using quartet scanning. BMC Bioinformatics 10:1–18.
46. Lemieux B, Turmel M, Lemieux C. 1990. Recombination of Chlamydomonas chloroplast DNA occurs more frequently in the large inverted repeat sequence than in the single-copy regions. Theor Appl Genet. 79:17–27.
47. Lockwood JD, Aleksic JM, Zou J, Wang J, Liu J, Renner SS. 2013. A new phylogeny for the genus Picea from plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:717–727.
48. Maréchal A, Brisson N. 2010. Recombination and the maintenance of plant organelle genome stability. New Phytol. 186:299–317.
49. Marshall HD, Newton C, Ritland K. 2001. Sequence-repeat polymorphisms exhibit the signature of recombination in lodgepole pine chloroplast DNA. Mol Biol Evol. 18:2136–2138.
50. Martin DP, Rybicki E. 2000. RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics 16:562–563.
51. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B. 2015. RDP4: detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol. 1:1–5.
52. Maynard Smith J. 1992. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol. 34:126–129.
53. Medgyesy P, Fejes E, Maliga P. 1985. Interspecific chloroplast recombination in a Nicotiana somatic hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 82:6960–6964.
54. Mengistu LW, Mueller-Warrant GW, Liston A, Barker RE. 2000. psbA Mutation (valine 219 to isoleucine) in Poa annua resistant to metribuzin and diuron. Pest Manag Sci. 56:209–217.
55. Moran NA. 1996. Accelerated evolution and Muller’s rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93:2873–2878.
56. Mosca E, Eckert AJ, Liechty JD, Wegrzyn JL, La Porta N, Vendramin GG, Neale DB. 2012. Contrasting patterns of nucleotide diversity for four conifers of Alpine European forests. Evol Appl. 5:762–775.
57. Nystedt B, et al. 2013. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497:579–584.
58. Odom OW, Baek KH, Dani RN, Herrin DL. 2008. Chlamydomonas chloroplasts can use short dispersed repeats and multiple pathways to repair a double-strand break in the genome. Plant J. 53:842–853.
59. Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM. 1999. Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology 265:218–225.
60. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290.
61. Parks M, Cronn R, Liston A. 2009. Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes. BMC Biol. 7:84.
62. Pfeifer B, Wittelsbürger U, Ramos-Onsins SE, Lercher MJ. 2014. PopGenome: an efficient swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Mol Biol Evol. 31:1929–1936.
63. Planet PJ. 2006. Tree disagreement: measuring and testing incongruence in phylogenies. J Biomed Inform. 39:86–102.
64. Posada D, Crandall KA. 2001. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98:13757–13762.
65. Prjibelski AD, et al. 2014. ExSPAnder: a universal repeat resolver for DNA region assembly. Bioinformatics 30:293–301.
66. Ran JH, Shen TT, Liu WJ, Wang PP, Wang XQ. 2015. Mitochondrial introgression and complex biogeographic history of the genus Picea. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 93:63–76.
67. Robinson DF, Foulds LR. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math Biosci. 53:131–147.
68. Salminen MO, Carr JK, Burke DS, McCutchan FE. 1995. Identification of breakpoints in intergenotypic recombinants of HIV type 1 by boot-scanning. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 11:1423–1425.
69. Sand A, Holt MK, Johansen J, Fagerberg R, Brodal GS, Pedersen CN, Mailund T. 2013. Algorithms for computing the triplet and quartet distances for binary and general trees. Biology 2:1189–1209.
70. Schierup MH, Hein J. 2000. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 156:879–891.
71. Schliep KP. 2011. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27:592–593.
72. Schneider H, Smith AR, Cranfill R, Hildebrand TJ, Haufler CH, Ranker TA. 2004. Unraveling the phylogeny of polygrammoid ferns (Polypodiaceae and Grammitidaceae): exploring aspects of the diversification of epiphytic plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 31:1041–1063.
73. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313.
74. Strauss SH, Palmer JD, Howe GT, Doerksen AH. 1988. Chloroplast genomes of two conifers lack a large inverted repeat and are extensively rearranged. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 85:3898–3902.
75. Sutton BCS, Flanagan D, El-Kassaby YA. 1991. A simple and rapid method for estimating representation of species in spruce seedlots using chloroplast DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism. Silvae Genet. 40:119–123.
76. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
77. Szmidt AE, Aldén T, Hällgren JE. 1987. Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA in Larix. Plant Mol Biol. 9:59–64.
78. Wang B, Wang X-R. 2014. Mitochondrial DNA capture and divergence in Pinus provide new insights into the evolution of the genus. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 80:20–30.
79. Wang X-Q, Tank DC, Sang T. 2000. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: evidence from three genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 17:773–781.
80. Weiller GF. 1998. Phylogenetic profiles: a graphical method for detecting genetic recombinations in homologous sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 15:326–335.
81. White EE. 1990. Chloroplast DNA in Pinus monticola. 2. Survey of within-species variability and detection of heteroplasmic individuals. Theor Appl Genet. 79:251–255.
82. Whitney KD, Ahern JR, Campbell LG, Albert LP, King MS. 2010. Patterns of hybridization in plants. Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 12:175–182.
83. Willyard A, Syring J, Gernandt DS, Liston A, Cronn R. 2007. Fossil calibration of molecular divergence infers a moderate mutation rate and recent radiations for Pinus. Mol Biol Evol. 24:90–101.
84. Wolfe AD, Randle CP. 2004. Recombination, heteroplasmy, haplotype polymorphism, and paralogy in plastid genes: implications for plant molecular systematics. Syst Bot. 29:1011–1020.
85. Wolfe KH, Li W-H, Sharp PM. 1987. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 84:9054–9058.
86. Wong WSW, Yang Z, Goldman N, Nielsen R. 2004. Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites. Genetics 168:1041–1051.
87. Wright JW. 1955. Species crossability in spruce in relation to distribution and taxonomy. For Sci. 1:319–349.
88. Wu CS, Lin CP, Hsu CY, Wang RJ, Chaw SM. 2011. Comparative chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae: insights into the mechanism of diversified genomic organizations. Genome Biol Evol/3:309–319.
89. Yang JC, Joo M, So S, Yi DK, Shin CH, Lee YM, Choi K. 2016. The complete plastid genome sequence of Picea jezoensis (Pinaceae: Piceoideae). Mitochondrial DNA A 27:3761–3763.
90. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586–1591.
91. Yang Z, Wong WSW, Nielsen R. 2005. Bayes empirical Bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1107–1118.
92. Zhang Q, Sodmergen Liu Y. 2003. Examination of the cytoplasmic DNA in male reproductive cells to determine the potential for cytoplasmic inheritance in 295 angiosperm species. Plant Cell Physiol. 44:941–951.
93. Zou J, Yue W, Li L, Wang X, Lu J, Duan B, Liu J. 2016. DNA barcoding of recently diversified tree species: a case study on spruces based on 20 DNA fragments from three different genomes. Trees 30:959–969.