A systematic literature review on evaluation of digital tools for authoring evidence-based clinical guidelines

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 239, Issue , 2017, Pages 48-54

  Khodambashi, Soudabeh ^a   Nytrø, Øystein ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Clinical guidelines; Evaluation; Evidence based medicine

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL DEVICES; HYBRID INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; SEARCH ENGINES;

CLINICAL GUIDELINE; DATABASE SEARCHES; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOW; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; MAINTENANCE PROCESS; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW;

REVIEWS;

ATTENTION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DATA BASE; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PUBLISHING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WORKFLOW; FOLLOW UP; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NORWAY; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SOFTWARE;

FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; NORWAY; PHYSICIANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85026882788     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-783-2-48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Field MJ, Lohr KN. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use: National Academies Press; 1992.
2. Khodambashi S, Nytrø Ø, editors. Information System Support for the WHO Clinical Guideline Development Process: A Case Study Approach. ECIME2016-10th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation: ECIME 2016;2016:Accepted, under publishing process, Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
3. Khodambashi S, Nytrø Ø. Reviewing Clinical Guideline Development Tools: Features and Characteristics. 2017:30.
4. Bernstam E, Ash N, Peleg M, Tu S, Boxwala AA, Mork P, Shortliffe EH, Greenes RA, editors. Guideline classification to assist modeling, authoring, implementation and retrieval. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium; 2000: American Medical Informatics Association.
5. Khodambashi S, Nytrø Ø, editors. Tool Support for Maintaining Clinical Guidelines: A Case Study. ECIME2015-9th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation: ECIME 2015;2015: Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
6. G-I-N. Guideline process - useful tools. 2015 [cited 2016 May]; List of useful tools for the guideline process, their features and cross-compatibilities]. Available from: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XE-zbU-FqK08nFyfhvB17tXeq-r2j5BRAeZZ4Xa5Axg/edit#gid=0.
7. Kristiansen A, Brandt L, Agoritsas T, Akl EA, Berge E, Jacobsen AF, Granan L-P, Halvorsen S, Guyatt G, Vandvik PO. Applying new strategies for the national adaptation, updating, and dissemination of trustworthy guidelines: results from the Norwegian adaptation of the antithrombotic therapy and the prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST Journal. 2014;146(3):735-61.
8. Brozek J, Akl E, Falck-Ytter Y, Kunstman P, Meerpohl J, Mustafa R, Nowak A, Oxman A, Santesso N, Wiercioch W. 046 Guideline Development Tool (GDT)-Web-Based Solution for Guideline Developers and Authors of Systematic Reviews. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2013;22(Suppl 1):A26-A.
9. Neumann I, Brignardello-Petersen R, Wiercioch W, Carrasco-Labra A, Cuello C, Akl E, Mustafa RA, Al-Hazzani W, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Rojas MX. The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels. Implementation Science. 2016;11(1):93.
10. Hartling L, Fernandes RM, Seida J, Vandermeer B, Dryden DM. From the trenches: a cross-sectional study applying the GRADE tool in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. PloS one. 2012;7(4):e34697.
11. Schünemann HJ, Mustafa R, Brozek J, Santesso N, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt G, Scholten R, Langendam M, Leeflang MM, Akl EA. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2016;76:89-98.
12. Vandvik PO, Santesso N, Akl EA, You J, Mulla S, Spencer FA, Johnston BC, Brozek J, Kreis J, Brandt L. Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2012;65(7):748-55.
13. Langendam M, Carrasco-Labra A, Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Brignardello-Petersen R, Ventresca M, Heus P, Lasserson T, Moustgaard R, Brozek J. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2016;74:19-27.
14. Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Santesso N, Cheung A, Prediger B, Baldeh T, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Neumann I, Bossuyt P. Decision-making about healthcare related tests and diagnostic strategies: user testing of GRADE evidence tables. PloS one. 2015;10(10):e0134553.
15. Höhne W, Karge T, Siegmund B, Preiss J, Hoffmann J, Zeitz M, Fölsch U. An internet portal for the development of clinical practice guidelines. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2010;1(4):430.
16. Shiffman RN, Michel G, Rosenfeld RM, Davidson C. Building better guidelines with BRIDGE-Wiz: development and evaluation of a software assistant to promote clarity, transparency, and implementability. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2012;19(1):94-101.
17. Harrison MB, Graham ID, Fervers B, van den Hoek J. Adapting knowledge to a local context. Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice. 2009:73-82.
18. Marshall C, Brereton P, Kitchenham B, editors. Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: a cross-domain survey using semi-structured interviews. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering; 2015: ACM.
19. Cook DA, West CP. Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Medical education. 2012;46(10):943-52.
20. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic reviews. 2016;5(1):210.
21. Couban R. Covidence and Rayyan. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. 2016;37(3).
22. ∗ Unsettled (and Unsettling?) Law. VOLUME 37, NUMBER/NUMÉRO 3 DECEMBER 2016 DÉCEMBRE. 2016:118.
23. Abedjan Z, Chu X, Deng D, Fernandez RC, Ilyas IF, Ouzzani M, Papotti P, Stonebraker M, Tang N. Detecting Data Errors: Where are we and what needs to be done? Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 2016;9(12):993-1004.
24. Lau J, Hadar N, Iovin R, Ip S, Balk EM. Proposed Governance and Data Management Policy for the Systematic Review Data Repository. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD); 2012.
25. Saldanha IJ, Schmid CH, Lau J, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Jap J, Smith BT, Carini S, Chan W, Bruijn B. Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Systematic reviews. 2016;5(1):196.
26. Bonardi A, Clifford CJ, Hadar N. A Structured Approach Using the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) Building the Evidence for Oral Health Interventions in the Population With Intellectual and Developmental Disability. Evaluation Review. 2016:0193841X16664811.
27. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module. Systematic reviews. 2015;4(1):6.
28. Stromme H, Straumann GH, Kirkehei I, Heintz M, Hafstad E. Can Epistemonikos replace The Cochrane Library?
29. Tsafnat G, Glasziou P, Choong MK, Dunn A, Galgani F, Coiera E. Systematic review automation technologies. Systematic reviews. 2014;3(1):74.
30. Rathbone J, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semiautomated online screening program for systematic reviewers. Systematic reviews. 2015;4(1):80.
31. Khodambashi S, Nytrø Ø, editors. Usability Evaluation of Published Clinical guidelines on the Web: A Case Study. 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS); 2016: IEEE.