Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Saldanha, Ian J ^a   Schmid, Christopher H ^b   Lau, Joseph ^b   Dickersin, Kay ^a   Berlin, Jesse A ^c   Jap, Jens ^b   Smith, Bryant T ^b   Carini, Simona ^d   Chan, Wiley ^e   Bruijn, Berry ^f   Wallace, Byron C ^g   Hutfless, Susan M ^h   Sim, Ida ^d   Murad, M Hassan ⁱ   Walsh, Sandra A ^j   Whamond, Elizabeth J ^k   Li, Tianjing ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^f NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^g Northeastern University   (United States)

^h JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^j California Breast Cancer Organizations   (United States)

^k Internal Medicine   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Data abstraction; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DOCUMENTATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; PROCEDURES;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84997207684     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0373-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Board on Health Care Services, Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011.
2. Chandler J, Churchill R, Higgins J, Lasserson T, and Tovey D. Methodological standards for the conduct of new Cochrane intervention reviews. Version 2.3, December 2, 2013. Available at: http://www.editorial-unit.cochrane.org/sites/editorial-unit.cochrane.org/files/uploads/MECIR_conduct_standards%202.3%2002122013.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2016.
3. Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):697-703.
4. Gøtzsche PC, Hróbjartsson A, Maric K, Tendal B. Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences. JAMA. 2007;298(4):430-7.
5. Jones AP, Remmington T, Williamson PR, Ashby D, Smyth RL. High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(7):741-2.
6. Horton J, Vandermeer B, Hartling L, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP, Buscemi N. Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(3):289-98.
7. Gresham G, Matsumura S, Li T. Faster may not be better: data abstraction for systematic reviews. In: Evidence-Informed Publich Health: Opportunities and Challenges. Abstracts of the 22nd Cochrane Colloquium; 2014 21-26 Sep; Hyderabad, India. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
8. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Methodology Committee. Draft methodology report: our questions, our decisions: standards for patient-centered outcomes research. July 23, 2012 version. Available at: http://pcori.org/assets/MethodologyReport-Comment.pdf ; Accessed 6 Sept 2016.
9. Center for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York, UK: York Publishing Services, Ltd. Available at: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2016.
10. Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ Publication No. 10(14)-EHC063-EF. Rockville. Available at: https://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/CER-Methods-Guide-140109.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2016
11. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200-7.
12. Ip S, Hadar N, Keefe S, Parkin C, Iovin R, Balk EM, et al. A Web-based archive of systematic review data. Syst Rev. 2012;1:15. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-15.
13. Li T, Vedula SS, Hadar N, Parkin C, Lau J, Dickersin K. Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):287-94. doi: 10.7326/M14-1603.
14. Choi M, Hector M. Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):188.e13-21.
15. Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, Gurbel PA, Tantry U, Lin Y, et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(1):40-51. doi: 10.7326/M14-2957.
16. Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, Lee AM, Macfarlane DJ, Leung SS, et al. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e70.
17. Appleton KM, Sallis HM, Perry R, Ness AR, Churchill R. Omega-3 fatty acids for depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;Issue 11:CD004692. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004692.pub4.
18. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 6 Sept 2016.
19. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-2.