Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ouzzani, Mourad ^a   Hammady, Hossam ^a   Fedorowicz, Zbys ^b   Elmagarmid, Ahmed ^a  

^a QATAR COMPUTING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Qatar)

^b Cochrane Bahrain ^*  (Bahrain)

Author keywords

Automation; Evidence based medicine; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INTERNET; MOBILE APPLICATION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WORKSHOP; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARDS; TIME FACTOR;

FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERNET; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85002662116     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, Ambroz A. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials. 1981; 2(1):31-49.
2. Uman LS. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011; 20(1):57.
3. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9.
4. Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Brodley C, Schmid CH. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinforma. 2010; 11(1):55.
5. Tsafnat G, Glasziou P, Choong MK, Dunn A, Galgani F, Coiera E. Systematic review automation technologies. Syst Rev. 2014; 3(1):74.
6. O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev. 2015; 4(1):5.
7. Ruby on Rails. http://rubyonrails.org. Accessed Jan 2016.
8. Heroku. http://heroku.com. Accessed Jan 2016.
9. Heroku Postgres. https://www.heroku.com/postgres. Accessed Jan 2016.
10. Logentries. https://logentries.com. Accessed Jan 2016.
11. NewRelic. http://newrelic.com. Accessed Jan 2016.
12. Pusher. https://pusher.com. Accessed Jan 2016.
13. HireFire. https://www.hirefire.io. Accessed Jan 2016.
14. EMBASE screening project to filter randomised controlled trials. http://screening.metaxis.com/EMBASE/. Accessed Jan 2016.
15. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995; 20(3):273-97. doi: s10.1007/BF00994018.
16. Cohen A, Hersh W, Peterson K, Yen PY. Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification. J Am Med Inform Assoc: JAMIA. 2006; 13(2):206-19. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1929.
17. Pedrazzi V, Oliveira-Neto JM, Sequeira P, Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M. Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4(CD006384). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006384.pub3.
18. Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Sequeira-Byron P, de Souza RF, Carter B, Heft M. Irrigants for non-surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2012;9(CD008948). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008948.pub2.
19. Paynter R, Banez LL, Berliner E, Erinoff E, Lege-Matsuura J, Potter S, Uhl S. EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews. Research white paper. AHRQ publication 16-EHC023-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195359.