Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: Evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Rathbone, John ^a   Carter, Matt ^a   Hoffmann, Tammy ^a   Glasziou, Paul ^a  

^a BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bibliographic database; Citation screening; Deduplication; EndNote; Reference manager; SRA DM; Systematic review; Systematic Review Assistant Deduplication Module

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CITATION ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); INFORMATION PROCESSING; PUBLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PUBLICATIONS; RECORDS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84939152797     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Islamaj Dogan R, Murray GC, Névéol A, Lu Z: Understanding PubMed user search behavior through log analysis. Database J Biol Databases Curation 2009, 2009:1.
2. MEDLINE - fact sheet. [ http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html ]
3. Embase.[http://www.ovid.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=13051&catalogId=13151&langId=-1&partNumber=Prod-903]
4. Lefebvre C, Eisinga A, McDonald S, Paul N: Enhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide-the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane library. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2008, 5:13. 10.1186/1742-7622-5-13
5. Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Brodley C, Schmid CH: Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:1-11. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-1
6. Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Horsley T: Managing database overlap in systematic reviews using batch citation matcher: case studies using scopus. J Med Libr Assoc 2006, 94:461-463.
7. Sievert MC, Andrews MJ: Indexing consistency in information science abstracts. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1991, 42:1-6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199101)42:1<1::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
8. Smith B, Darzins P, Quinn M, Heller R: Modern methods of searching the medical literature. Med J Aust 1992, 2:603-611.
9. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P: The comprehensiveness of MEDLINE and Embase computer searches. Searches for controlled trials of homoeopathy, ascorbic acid for common cold and ginkgo biloba for cerebral insufficiency and intermittent claudication. Pharm Weekbl Sci 1992, 14:316-320. 10.1007/BF01977620
10. Odaka T, Nakayama A, Akazawa K, Sakamoto M, Kinukawa N, Kamakura T, Nishioka Y, Itasaka H, Watanabe Y, Nose Y: The effect of a multiple literature database search-a numerical evaluation in the domain of Japanese life science. J Med Syst 1992, 16:177-181. 10.1007/BF00999380
11. Rovers JP, Janosik JE, Souney PF: Crossover comparison of drug information online database vendors: dialog and MEDLARS. Ann Pharmacother 1993, 27:634-639.
12. Ramos-Remus C, Suarez-Almazor M, Dorgan M, Gomez-Vargas A, Russell AS: Performance of online biomedical databases in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1994, 21:1912-1921.
13. Royle P, Milne R: Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003, 19:591-603.
14. EndNote. [ http://endnote.com/ ]
15. Reference manager. [ http://www.refman.com/ ]
16. Mendeley. [ http://www.mendeley.com/ ]
17. RefWorks. [ www.refworks.com ]
18. Qi X, Yang M, Ren W, Jia J, Wang J, Han G, Fan D: Find duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases in systematic review. PLoS One 2013, 8:e71838. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071838
19. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, Michie S, Moher D, Wager E: Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014, 383:267-276. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X
20. Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, Krumholz HM, Ghersi D, van der Worp HB: Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet 2014, 383:257-266. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5
21. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, Howells DW, Ioannidis JP, Oliver S: How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014, 383:156-165. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1
22. Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tibshirani R: Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014, 383:166-175. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8
23. Jiang Y, Lin C, Meng W, Yu C, Cohen AM, Smalheiser NR: Rule-based deduplication of article records from bibliographic databases. Database (Oxford) 2014, 2014:1-7.
24. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. [ http://www.cochrane.org/handbook ]
25. Removing duplicates in retrieval sets from electronic databases: comparing the efficiency and accuracy of the Bramer-method with other methods and software packages.[http://www.iss.it/binary/eahi/cont/57_Wichor_M._Bramer.pdf ]
26. Source code. [ https://github.com/CREBP/SRA ]
27. Systematic review assistant - deduplication module. [ http://crebp-sra.com ]