Reviewing clinical guideline development tools: Features and characteristics

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Khodambashi, Soudabeh ^a   Nytrø, Øystein ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Clinical guideline; Electronic guideline authoring; Guideline development process; Guideline development tool

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MEDICAL SUBJECT HEADINGS; MEDLINE; MONITORING; ORGANIZATION; PUBLISHING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DESIGN; STANDARDS;

PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 85028744709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0530-5     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, Peute LW. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(3):327-34.
2. Merritt TA, Palmer D, Bergman DA, Shiono PH. Clinical practice guidelines in pediatric and newborn medicine: implications for their use in practice. Pediatrics. 1997;99(1):100-14.
3. Steinberg E, Greenfield S, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Graham R. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust.1st edition. US National Academies Press; 2011.
4. WHO. WHO handbook for guideline development: World Health Organization (2nd edition); 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/145714/1/9789241548960-eng.pdf.
5. Khodambashi S, Nytrø Ø, editors. Tool Support for Maintaining Clinical Guidelines: A Case Study. ECIME2015-9th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation: ECIME 2015; 2015: Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
6. Kristiansen A, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P, Agoritsas T, Akl EA, Conboy T, et al. Development of a novel multilayered presentation format for clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2015;147:754-63
7. Shiffman RN, Michel G, Rosenfeld RM, Davidson C. Building better guidelines with BRIDGE-wiz: development and evaluation of a software assistant to promote clarity, transparency, and implementability. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(1):94-101.
8. Brozek J, Oxman A, Schünemann H. GRADEpro, version 3.2 for windows. 2012.
9. Guyatt G, Vandvik PO. Creating clinical practice guidelines: problems and solutions. Chest. 2013;144(2):365-7.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
11. G-I-N. Guidelines International Network 2016 [cited 2016]. Available from: http://www.g-i-n.net.
12. Cruzes DS, Dyba T, editors. Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), 2011 International Symposium on; 2011: IEEE.
13. Vandvik PO, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P, Treweek S, Akl EA, Kristiansen A, et al. Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. Chest. 2013;144(2):381-9.
14. Treweek S, Oxman AD, Alderson P, Bossuyt PM, Brandt L, Brożek J, et al. Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci. 2013;8:6.
15. Kristiansen A, Vandvik P, Alonso-Coello P, Rigau D, Brandt L, Guyatt G. 313WS electronic multilayered guideline format: a novel structure and presentation of trustworthy guidelines at the point of care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 1):A9-A10.
16. Brozek J, Akl E, Falck-Ytter Y, Kunstman P, Meerpohl J, Mustafa R, et al. P307 guideline development tool (GDT)-web-based solution for guideline developers and authors of systematic reviews. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 1):82.
17. Brozek J, Akl E, Falck-Ytter Y, Kunstman P, Meerpohl J, Mustafa R, et al. 046 guideline development tool (GDT)-web-based solution for guideline developers and authors of systematic reviews. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 1):A26-A.
18. Schünemann H, Mustafa R, Brozek J, Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Wiecioch W. Saudi Arabian: Saudi Arabian Manual for Healthcare Guideline Development. http://www.moh.gov.sa/depts/Proofs/Documents/SA%20Handbook%20-AB%2030-6-14%20v2.pdf.
19. Höhne W, Karge T, Siegmund B, Preiss J, Hoffmann J, Zeitz M, et al. An internet portal for the development of clinical practice guidelines. Appl Clin Inform. 2010;1(4):430.
20. Höhne W, Karge T, Siegmund B, Preiss J, Hoffmann J, Zeitz M, et al. An internet portal for the development of clinical practice guidelines. Appl Clin Inf. 2010;1:430-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2010-04-RA-0027. For personal or educational use only. aci-journal org. 2015:12-01
21. Peleg M. Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46(4):744-63.
22. G-I-N. Guideline process - useful tools 2015 [cited 2016 May]. List of useful tools for the guideline process, their features and cross-compatibilities]. Available from: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XE-zbU-FqK08nFyfhvB17tXeq-r2j5BRAeZZ4Xa5Axg/edit#gid=0.
23. NursingCenter.com. CAN-IMPLEMENT©: Clinical practice guidelines tailored for local use [cited 2016 May]. Available from: http://www.nursingcenter.com/evidencebasedpracticenetwork/canimplement.aspx?id=1917711.
24. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-94.
25. Evidence D. Doctor Evidence platforms [cited 2016 May]. Available from: http://drevidence.com/.
26. Cochrane. Review Manager (RevMan) [cited 2016 May]. Cochrane's Informatics & Knowledge Management Department (IKMD)]. Available from: http://tech.cochrane.org/revman.
27. Evidence-Partners. Distiller software [cited 2016 May]. Available from: https://distillercer.com /.
28. Elmagarmid A FZ, Hammady H, Ilyas I, Khabsa M, Ouzzani M. Rayyan: a systematic reviews web app for exploring and filtering searches for eligible studies for Cochrane Reviews. 2014 21-26 Sep.
29. Institute JB. Joanna Briggs Institute system for the unified management, assessment and review of information (JBI SUMARI). 2014.
30. AHRQ. SRDR: Systematic Review Data Repository: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [cited 2016 May]. Available from: http://srdr.ahrq.gov /.
31. EPPI-Centre. EPPI-Reviewer 4 2010. Available from: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/CMS/Default.aspx?alias=eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/er4&.
32. CREBP-SRA. CREBP Systematic Review Creator. Available from: http://crebp-sra.com//. Accessed 9 May 2017.
33. Babineau J. Product review: covidence (systematic review software). J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2014;35(2):68-71.
34. Rada G, Pérez D, Capurro D, editors. Epistemonikos: a free, relational, collaborative, multilingual database of health evidence. Medinfo IMIA and IOS Press; 2013.
35. Rathbone J, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.
36. G-I-N. GIN guideline library- Guideline International Network [cited 2016 May]. Available from: http://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library.
37. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of systematic review assistant-Deduplication module. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1-6. 10.1186/2046-4053-4-6.
38. Evidence-Prime. GDTs database of evidence profiles [cited 2016 May]. Available from: http://dbep.gradepro.org/search.
39. Brozek J, Oxman A, Schünemann H. GRADEpro.[computer program]. Version 32 for windows. 2008.
40. Khodambashi S, Gilstad H, Nytrø Ø. Usability evaluation of clinical guidelines on the web using eye-tracker. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:95.
41. Khodambashi S, Nytrø Ø, editors. Usability Evaluation of Published Clinical guidelines on the Web: A Case Study. 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS); 2016: IEEE Conference Publicationsm. doi: 10.1109/CBMS.2016.11.
42. Khodambashi S, Wang Z, Nytrø Ø. Reality versus user's perception in finding answer to clinical questions in published National Guidelines on the web: an empirical study. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;63:268-75.
43. Khodambashi S, Perry A, Nytrø Ø. Comparing user experiences on the search-based and content-based recommendation ranking on stroke clinical guidelines-a case study. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;63:260-7.
44. Khodambashi S, Gilstad H, Nytrø Ø. Usability evaluation of clinical guidelines on the web using eye-tracker. Medical informatics Europe (MIE 2016); 2016: Accepted, under publishing process.
45. Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, et al. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):52-68.
46. De Clercq PA, Blom JA, Korsten HH, Hasman A. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artif Intell Med. 2004;31(1):1-27.
47. World-Health-Organization. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development Process - World Health Organization 2010 [cited 2015 10.03.2015]. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/mtct/grc-handbook-mar2010-1.pdf.
48. Editors ICoMJ. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Forms 2015 [cited 2015 22 July 2015]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/faqs/conflict-of-interest-disclosure-forms/.
49. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, OllenschlÃĪger G, Phillips S, van der Wees P. Guidelines international network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):525-31.
50. Terrace L. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18-23.
51. Guideline Development Checklist 2014 [cited 2015 22 July 2015]. Available from: http://cebgrade.mcmaster.ca/guidelinechecklistonline.html.
52. WHO. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development: World Health Organization; 2012 2012.
53. SIGN. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Methodology checklist. SIGN. 2014. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/checklists-and-notes.html.
54. Oxford. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of evidence [cited 2016 May]. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/checklists-and-notes.html.
55. Goldet G, Howick J. Understanding GRADE: an introduction. J Evid Based Med. 2013;6(1):50-4.
56. West SL, King V, Carey TS, Lohr KN, McKoy N, Sutton SF, et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services; AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016 April 2002.
57. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6.
58. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, Phillips B, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest. 2006;129(1):174-81.
59. Yale University. Available Versions of BridgeWiz 2011 [cited 2016 May]. Available from: http://gem.med.yale.edu/BRIDGE-Wiz/.
60. Shiffman RN, Michel G, Krauthammer M, Fuchs NE, Kaljurand K, Kuhn T. Writing clinical practice guidelines in controlled natural language. Controlled Natural Language: Springer; 2010. p. 265-280.
61. Organization WH. International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems (The) ICD-10: World Health Organization; 2004.
62. Donnelly K. SNOMED-CT. the advanced terminology and coding system for eHealth. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;121:279. https://books.google.no/books?hl=en&lr=lang-en&id=Tw5eAtsatiUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=International+statistical+classification+of+diseases+and+health+related+problems+(The)+ICD-10&ots=o37-mqFhJ&sig=SNAl2HuzMXLSWNFdzvcOqgoKyts&redir-esc=y#v=onepage&q=International%20statistical%20classification%20of%20diseases%20and10&f=false.
63. Miller G, Britt H. A new drug classification for computer systems: the ATC extension code. Int J Biomed Comput. 1995;40(2):121-4.
64. Liu S, Ma W, Moore R, Ganesan V, Nelson S. RxNorm: prescription for electronic drug information exchange. IT Prof. 2005;7(5):17-23.
65. Nelson SJ, Johnston WD, Humphreys BL. Relationships in medical subject headings (MeSH). Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge: Springer; 2001. p. 171-184.
66. Lamberts H, Okkes I. ICPC-2, international classification of primary care. 1998. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-9696-1-11.
67. McDonald CJ, Huff SM, Suico JG, Hill G, Leavelle D, Aller R, et al. LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update. Clin Chem. 2003;49(4):624-33.
68. Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The unified medical language system. Methods Inf Med. 1993;32(4):281-91.
69. About Epistemonikos [cited 2015 27 July 2015]. Available from: http://www.epistemonikos.org/en/about-us/who-we-are.
70. Beale T, Heard S, Kalra D, Lloyd D. OpenEHR architecture overview. The OpenEHR Foundation. 2006.