Accuracy of linear measurements around dental implants by means of cone beam computed tomography with different exposure parameters

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  L Bohner, Lauren O ^a,b   Tortamano, Pedro ^a   Marotti, Juliana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

CBCT; Dental implant; Image analysis

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR BONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MAXILLA; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MAXILLA; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 85026377999     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20160377     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Naitoh M, Hayashi H, Tsukamoto N, Ariji E. Labial bone assessment surrounding dental implant using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 970-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02249.x
2. Demircan S, Demircan E. Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of the anterior maxillary bone thickness for immediate implant placement. Implant Dent 2015; 24: 664-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000340
3. Benic GI, Elmasry M, Hammerle CH. Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 86-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12616
4. Kamburoglu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol 2015; 7: 128-30.
5. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 25-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
6. de-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Alencar PN, Rovaris K, Campos PS, Haiter-Neto F. Enhancement cone-beam computed tomography filters improve in vitro periimplant dehiscence detection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: 633-9.
7. Fienitz T, Schwarz F, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Becker J, Rothamel D. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 882-7.
8. Golubovic V, Mihatovic I, Becker J, Schwarz F. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the configuration and extent of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects. A pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 16: 349-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0320-2
9. Gonzaléz-Martin O, Oteo C, Ortega R, Alandez J, Sanz M, Veltri M. Evaluation of peri-implant buccal bone by computed tomog-raphy: an experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 950-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12663
10. Pinheiro LR, Gaia BF, de Sales AO, Umetsubo OS, Júnior OS, Cavalcanti MG. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 120: 69-77.
11. Razavi T, Palmer, RM, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer PJ. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 718-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01905.x
12. Shiratori LN, Marotti J, Yamanouchi J, Chilvarquer I, Contin I, Tortamano-Neto P. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 797-804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02207.x
13. Degen K, Habor D, Radermacher K, Heger S, Kern JS, Wolfart S, et al. Assessment of cortical bone thickness using ultrasound. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12829
14. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemo M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 10-17.
15. Sancho-Puchades M, Hämmerle CH, Benic GI. In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium, titanium-zirconium and zirconium dioxide implants in cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1222-8.
16. Mangione F, Meleo D, Talocco M, Pecci R, Pacifici L, Bedini R. Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements between cone beam computed tomography and 3D micro-tomography. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2013; 49: 261-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN-13-03-05
17. Benic GI, Sancho-Puchades M, Jung RE, Deyhle H, Hammerle CH. In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 378-83.
18. Kim G, Jung H, Lee H, Lee J, Koo S, Chang S. Accuracy and reliability of length measurements on three-dimensional computed tomography using open-source OsiriX software. J Digit Imaging 2012; 25: 486-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9458-6
19. Lin L. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate re-producibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255-68.
20. Kamburoglu K, Murat S, Kiliç C, Yuksel S, Avsever H, Farman A, et al. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 1-9.
21. Blanco J, Alonso A, Sanz M. Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year case series prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 294-301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01106.x
22. Torres MG, Campos PS, Segundo NP, Navarro M, Crusoé-Rebello I. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 150-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31824bf93c
23. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Max-illofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 113: 817-26.
24. Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44:1-25.
25. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Sanderink G, De Smet E, Nowak B, van Dam J, et al. A comparison of the effective dose from scanog-raphy with periapical radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 159-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600683