Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: A histologically controlled study in dogs

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 882-887

  Fienitz, Tim ^a   Schwarz, Frank ^a   Ritter, Lutz ^b   Dreiseidler, Timo ^b   Becker, Juergen ^a   Rothamel, Daniel ^b  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal experiments; Bone regeneration; Bone substitutes; CT imaging; Guided tissue regeneration

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOG; IMPLANT; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PERIIMPLANTITIS; PERIODONTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DOGS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, PERIODONTAL; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MANDIBLE; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84862235768     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02232.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Albrektsson, T. (1983) Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry50: 255-261.
2. Dahlin, C., Linde, A., Gottlow, J. & Nyman, S. (1988) Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery81: 672-676.
3. Danforth, R.A., Peck, J. & Hall, P. (2003) Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. Journal of the Californian Dental Association31: 847-852.
4. Davies, J.E. (1998) Mechanisms of endosseous integration. International Journal of Prosthodontics11: 391-401.
5. Draenert, F.G., Coppenrath, E., Herzog, P., Muller, S. & Mueller-Lisse, U.G. (2007) Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology36: 198-203.
6. Dreiseidler, T., Mischkowski, R.A., Neugebauer, J., Ritter, L. & Zoller, J.E. (2009) Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants24: 216-225.
7. Haaga, J.R., Miraldi, F., MacIntyre, W., LiPuma, J.P., Bryan, P.J. & Wiesen, E. (1981) The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomography image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. Radiology138: 449-454.
8. Honda, K., Larheim, T.A., Maruhashi, K., Matsumoto, K. & Iwai, K. (2006) Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology35: 152-157.
9. Leung, C.C., Palomo, L., Griffith, R. & Hans, M.G. (2010) Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics137: S109-119.
10. Loubele, M., Maes, F., Schutyser, F., Marchal, G., Jacobs, R. & Suetens, P. (2006) Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology102: 225-234.
11. Marmulla, R., Wortche, R., Muhling, J. & Hassfeld, S. (2005) Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology34: 28-31.
12. Mengel, R., Kruse, B. & Flores-de-Jacoby, L. (2006) Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles. Journal of Periodontology77: 1234-1241.
13. Misch, K.A., Yi, E.S. & Sarment, D.P. (2006) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. Journal of Periodontology77: 1261-1266.
14. Mischkowski, R.A., Pulsfort, R., Ritter, L., Neugebauer, J., Brochhagen, H.G., Keeve, E. & Zoller, J.E. (2007) Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology104: 551-559.
15. Mozzo, P., Procacci, C., Tacconi, A., Martini, P.T. & Andreis, I.A. (1998) A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. European Journal of Radiology8: 1558-1564.
16. Neugebauer, J., Shirani, R., Mischkowski, R.A., Ritter, L., Scheer, M., Keeve, E. & Zoller, J.E. (2008) Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology105: 633-642; discussion 643.
17. Ozmeric, N., Kostioutchenko, I., Hagler, G., Frentzen, M. & Jervoe-Storm, P.M. (2008) Cone-beam computed tomography in assessment of periodontal ligament space: in vitro study on artificial tooth model. Clinical Oral Investigations12: 233-239.
18. Pinsky, H.M., Dyda, S., Pinsky, R.W., Misch, K.A. & Sarment, D.P. (2006) Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology35: 410-416.
19. Ritter, L., Mischkowski, R.A., Neugebauer, J., Dreiseidler, T., Scheer, M., Keeve, E. & Zoller, J.E. (2009b) The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology108: e108-116.
20. Ritter, L., Neugebauer, J., Dreiseidler, T., Rothamel, D., Cizek, J., Karapetian, V.E., Mischkowski, R.A., Bindl, A. & Zoller, J.E. (2009a) 3D X-ray meets CAD/CAM dentistry: a novel procedure for virtual dental implant planning. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry12: 29-40.
21. Rungcharassaeng, K., Caruso, J.M., Kan, J.Y., Kim, J. & Taylor, G. (2007) Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics132: e421-428.
22. Schulze, R.K., Berndt, D. & d'Hoedt, B. (2010) On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research21: 100-107.
23. Schwarz, F., Jung, R.E., Fienitz, T., Wieland, M., Becker, J. & Sager, M. (2010) Impact of guided bone regeneration and defect dimension on wound healing at chemically modified hydrophilic titanium implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology37: 474-485.
24. Sherrard, J.F., Rossouw, P.E., Benson, B.W., Carrillo, R. & Buschang, P.H. (2010) Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics137: S100-108.
25. Walter, C., Kaner, D., Berndt, D.C., Weiger, R. & Zitzmann, N.U. (2009) Three-dimensional imaging as a pre-operative tool in decision making for furcation surgery. Journal of Clinical Periodontology36: 250-257.
26. Walter, C., Weiger, R. & Zitzmann, N.U. (2010) Accuracy of three-dimensional imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement. Journal of Clinical Periodontology37: 436-441.