Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements between cone beam computed tomography and 3d microtomography

Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 261-265

  Mangione, Francesca ^a   Meleo, Deborah ^b   Talocco, Marco ^c   Pecci, Raffaella ^b   Pacifici, Luciano ^a   Bedini, Rossella ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Aartifacts; Cone beam CT; Linear measurements; MicroCT

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; SOFTWARE; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84890492454     PISSN: 00212571     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4415/ANN_13_03_05     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ, Mah JK, Hatcher D, Kim MJ, Sohn DS, Palti A, Perel ML, Judy KW, Misch CE, Wang HL. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implanto-logists consensus report. Implant Dent 2012;21(2):78-86. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5.
2. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72(1):75-80.
3. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005- 0031-2
4. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Ra-diol 1998;8(9):1558-64. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050586
5. Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-feld cone-beam CT and mul-tislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(4):512-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.05.004
6. Vandenberghe B, Luchsinger S, Hostens J, Dhoore E, Jacobs R; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. The infu-ence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41(6):466-74.
7. Sur J, Seki K, Koizumi H, Nakajima K, Okano T. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110(3):e29-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.041
8. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(1):16. e1-6; discussion 16-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.016
9. Szabo BT, Pataky L, Mikusi R, Fejerdy P, Dobo-Nagy C. Comparative evaluation of cone-beam CT equipment with micro-CT in the visualization of root canal system. Ann Ist Super Sanità 2012;48(1):49-52. DOI: 10.4415/ ANN-12-01-08.
10. Maret D, Molinier F, Braga J, Peters OA, Telmon N, Treil J, Inglèse JM, Cossié A, Kahn JL, Sixou M. Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography. J Dent Res 2010;89(12):1465-9. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510378011.
11. Wang Y, He S, Yu L, Li J, Chen S. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of teeth in vivo based on cone beam computer tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14(4):206-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01525.x.
12. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37(1):10-7. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/14140281
13. Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108(3):430-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.032.
14. Fatemitabar SA, Nikgoo A. Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):499-505.
15. Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10(4):226-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00083.x
16. Alves M Jr, Baratieri C, Nojima LI. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(10):1151-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02092.x.
17. Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: infuence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod 2009;31(2):129-34. DOI: 10.1093/ ejo/cjn088.
18. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillo-fac Radiol 2004;33(5):291-4.
19. Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallström H, Cherel F. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 2008;79(3):401-5. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070021 .
20. Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O, Peltomäki T. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141(1):41-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.034.
21. Cremonini CC, Dumas M, Pannuti CM, Neto JB, Cavalcanti MG, Lima LA. Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40(8):845-50. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijom.2011.04.015
22. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Müller S, Muel-ler-Lisse UG. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36(4):198-203.
23. Ganguly R, Ruprecht A, Vincent S, Hellstein J, Timmons S, Qian F. Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40(5):299-305. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/72117593
24. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA Jr. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140(5):734-44. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2011.06.021
25. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139(2):e117-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.08.016
26. Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Den-tomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40(2):67-75. DOI: 10.1259/ dmfr/27546065